1916-1918
Mark I to FT: reliability was the scandal, not the idea. Cambrai (1917) and 1918 combined arms are the first "tank battle" stories -- dated, not copied.
Germany's late A7V was a footnote; anti-tank rifles were already a reply.
The armoured fighting vehicle born on the Somme in 1916 -- a history of a type, not a guide to building or fighting in one.
Educational history. Casualty figures are documented ranges. This is not operational advice, a ranking of nations, or a how-to for weapons or coups.
The tank appeared as a British attempt to cross 1916 trench ground: Mark I machines at Flers-Courcelette on 15 September 1916. The cover name "tank" stuck. France's Schneider and Saint-Chamond, then the Renault FT (turret, rear engine), set a layout the twentieth century would repeat. This page is the history of a type -- employment in wars as recorded fact -- not a design or driving manual.
Interwar theorists (Fuller, Liddell Hart, Guderian, Tukhachevsky, de Gaulle) argued whether armour was an infantry helper or a decisive arm. 1939-41 seemed to answer; 1943-45 and later 1973 (Sinai) reopened the argument with guns and missiles. The main battle tank of the Cold War (Centurion, T-54/55, M60, Leopard 1/2, M1) was an industrial-political object as much as a vehicle.
Cultural memory is thick: war-film silhouettes, model kits, and "tankie" as a later political insult. Korean memory includes the T-34 in 1950 and the later K1/K2 as ROK industry. Intensity in this atlas is moderate -- a weapon type, not a world war -- while techShift is high. No paragraph here is a how-to for armour employment.
Deep introduction
The tank is a hundred-year argument about whether protected mobility still decides ground war -- told as history.
Mark I to FT: reliability was the scandal, not the idea. Cambrai (1917) and 1918 combined arms are the first "tank battle" stories -- dated, not copied.
Germany's late A7V was a footnote; anti-tank rifles were already a reply.
Panzer divisions, T-34, Sherman, and the Eastern Front's densities. Kursk is the popular caption; logistics and numbers are the quieter story.
This is wartime use as recorded, not a blitzkrieg recipe.
NATO and Warsaw Pact types as industrial alliances. The 1973 war's ATGMs entered every staff college paragraph -- historically.
Korea's K1 (with US design roots) and later K2 are a ROK industrial chapter.
Asymmetric wars, urban fights, and drones reopened "is the tank dead?" -- a cyclical headline since 1918. History's answer has been: not dead, not sufficient.
No current ORBAT or vulnerability cookbook belongs here.
Dated history of Tank (1916-present (as a type)) in From the Somme to every later armoured front.
Read →
02Historical forces and institutions of Tank -- not a live order of battle.
Read →
03How Tank unfolded as historical sequence, not instruction.
Read →
04Human and material cost of Tank, as documented ranges.
Read →
05People and debates around Tank.
Read →
06Afterlives and unresolved questions of Tank.
Read →
07Maps, portrayals and rituals of Tank.
Read →