Economist · The scholar of scarcity — from Adam Smith's pin factory to the central-bank decision room, still asked to predict what no model fully captures.
Darker cells mean a higher score for this topic on that metric.
LessMore
Last reviewed Sources & creditsMedia creditsMethodology
Three broad tracks share the title: academics who research and teach, policy economists at central banks, ministries and bodies like the IMF, and private-sector economists at banks, consultancies and tech firms. The daily work is similar everywhere — cleaning data, estimating models, writing, and explaining the results to people who must act on them.
Not legally — the title is unprotected everywhere. In practice, research roles at universities, central banks and international institutions are close to PhD-only, while ministries, commercial banks and consultancies hire at master's level, and the UK's Government Economic Service recruits straight from a bachelor's degree. The PhD is a union card for the research track, not the profession.
The US median was about $115,000 in 2023 according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, with Federal Reserve and IMF economists above it and chief economists at major banks earning $500,000 or more. Pay is far lower in nominal terms elsewhere: a government economist in India or Brazil earns a small fraction of US figures for identical work.
Strictly, no — it is the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel, endowed by Sweden's central bank in 1968 and first awarded in 1969, sixty-eight years after the original prizes. It is presented at the same Stockholm ceremony with the same prize money, which is why almost everyone, including economists, just says Nobel.
When Queen Elizabeth II visited the London School of Economics in November 2008 she asked exactly that. The British Academy's written answer blamed "a failure of the collective imagination of many bright people": standard macroeconomic models simply left the financial system out. The episode forced banking and credit back into mainstream models, a rebuild still under way.
A financial analyst values specific companies and securities to guide investment decisions, typically credentialed through the CFA program. An economist studies how whole systems behave — inflation, employment, trade, poverty — and asks causal questions about them. The training differs accordingly: analysts learn accounting and valuation, economists learn econometrics and modelling, usually through a master's or PhD.
Few professions have swung between contempt and command so completely. Aristotle ranked money-making among the lowest human activities; medieval theology treated lending at interest as sin; Carlyle sneered at "the dismal science." Yet by the mid twentieth century economists were writing national budgets, and today fourteen words from a central banker — most famously Mario Draghi's "whatever it takes" in July 2012 — can move trillions in asset prices.
The culture that grew around the profession reflects that double reputation. Economists are simultaneously the butt of a whole genre of jokes about unworldly forecasters — and the only academics whose annual mountain-resort symposium is broadcast live on financial television. Both facts are telling, and both are earned.
How much status the profession carried in each era, on a 0–100 scale.
Thinking systematically about money carried a moral taint: Aristotle condemned chrematistics, and the medieval church condemned usury outright. Estate stewards were respected servants, but no one held status as an economic thinker; the subject survived inside philosophy, law and theology.
Merchants and pamphleteers advising crowns on trade and coinage gained real if precarious influence — Jean-Baptiste Colbert ran France's economy for Louis XIV, and William Petty was knighted — but they were courtiers and projectors, not members of a recognized learned profession.
Political economists became genuine public intellectuals: Smith's book was quoted in Parliament within his lifetime, Ricardo bought a seat in it, and Mill's Principles educated a governing class. Still a gentleman's pursuit — there were chairs but almost no careers.
Depression, war and Keynes made economists indispensable to government. They designed Bretton Woods, staffed treasuries and central banks, won a Nobel from 1969, and by the 1990s chaired the institutions — Fed, IMF, ECB — that steered the world economy. Peak prestige, and peak deference.
The 2008 crisis, which almost no mainstream forecast foresaw, dented public trust — the Queen's pointed question at the LSE became the era's emblem — and populist politics openly discounts expert economic advice. The profession remains powerful, better paid than ever, and noticeably more humble in its claims.
The Oscar-winning comedy-drama follows the handful of analysts and fund managers who read the mortgage data everyone else ignored and bet against the US housing market before 2008 — celebrity cameos explain collateralized debt obligations directly to camera, making dry financial economics a mass-audience subject.
A University of Chicago economist and a journalist applied the field's tools to sumo cheating, baby names and drug-gang finances, selling millions of copies worldwide. The book recast the economist in popular culture from forecaster of GDP to all-purpose detective of hidden incentives, and launched a durable podcast franchise.
The four-Oscar biopic of John Nash dramatizes the Princeton mathematician whose 1950 equilibrium concept became the foundation of modern game theory — and of the 1994 economics Nobel he shared — while following his decades-long struggle with schizophrenia, giving economic theory its most famous cinematic moment.
The Paris School of Economics professor's 700-page history of wealth concentration, built on two centuries of tax records, became an improbable global bestseller with some 2.5 million copies sold, put r > g on protest placards, and made a working economist a household name across a dozen countries.
South Korea's hit drama about the 1997 Asian financial crisis follows a Bank of Korea monetary-policy team head, played by Kim Hye-soo, who sees national bankruptcy coming and fights her own government's secrecy as the IMF negotiations close in — a rare film whose hero is a working central-bank economist.
The Academy Award-winning documentary on the 2008 crisis is also the sharpest on-screen indictment of the profession itself: on-camera interviews expose prominent academic economists paid handsomely for reports and testimony favorable to the financial industry, and the film is credited with pushing US universities toward conflict-of-interest disclosure rules.
Almost the entire global market for new PhD economists clears through one coordinated annual ritual: candidates distill their dissertation into a single "job market paper," interview at the American Economic Association's January meetings or the European winter equivalent, then fly out for day-long seminar auditions. Where a career starts is largely settled in those few weeks — a centralized rite no other social science shares.
Every August since 1982, the Kansas City Fed has convened central bankers and academics at Jackson Lake Lodge in Wyoming — a venue chosen, by the organizers' own account, partly because the fly-fishing might tempt Fed chairman Paul Volcker to attend. It worked, and the symposium became the profession's most-watched pulpit: markets now parse every word of the chair's Jackson Hole speech in real time.
Economics seminars are famously combative: audiences interrupt from the first slide, and surviving the barrage is treated as initiation. The folklore became data in 2019, when a study presented to the American Economic Association found economists in seminars were interrupted substantially more often than scholars in comparable fields — and that women presenters drew disproportionately more of the interruptions, forcing an ongoing reckoning with the culture.
The jokes and the rituals describe the same tension: a profession asked to speak with scientific authority about a system that keeps surprising it. The two-handed hedging Truman mocked and the fan charts central banks publish are the same instinct in different dress — honesty about uncertainty, in a job where someone must decide anyway.
That tension is precisely why filmmakers keep returning to the figure of the economist who saw it coming: the fantasy, and occasionally the fact, of someone who read the data honestly while everyone else looked away.
Closest neighbours on the six-score profile — not the same field only.
Advises clients, drafts the documents that bind them, and argues their case when it reaches court — carrying personal legal liability if the advice is wrong.
AI-resistant 58 💊The medicines expert behind every prescription — from Baghdad's first drug shops and the apothecary's mortar to morphine, artemisinin and the modern dispensary.
AI-resistant 58 🛰️Designs, analyzes and certifies the aircraft, rockets and spacecraft that leave the ground, working to safety margins that leave no room for guessing.
AI-resistant 74 🧫Uses clinical, trial and health-system data to generate reliable evidence for safer care, research and operational decisions.
AI-resistant 68 🦾Designs the machines that sense, decide and act in the physical world, where the hard problem was never intelligence but the world itself.
AI-resistant 65 🌿Leads the strategy, measurement and reporting that helps organizations reduce environmental and social harm while meeting business obligations.
AI-resistant 66The person who starts the company — spotting the gap, bearing the risk and answering for payroll, from Assyrian caravan financiers to venture-backed founders.
AI-resistant 88 💹The dealmaker who prices companies and moves capital — a trade running from Medici Florence to today's pitch decks, paid for trust when billions change hands.
AI-resistant 42 🧾The keeper of the books: heir to a craft so old it invented writing itself, now negotiating with the software built to automate it.
AI-resistant 35 📣The professional who creates demand — from Pompeii's painted walls and P&G's 1931 brand-man memo to the auction-driven feeds of the digital era.
AI-resistant 38 🗺️Decides what a company should build next, and why — turning customer needs, business goals and engineering limits into one shared plan nobody else fully owns.
AI-resistant 50 🌿Leads the strategy, measurement and reporting that helps organizations reduce environmental and social harm while meeting business obligations.
AI-resistant 66