⚖️Pay & Market

In common-law countries, yes: British, Indian, American and Australian judges are appointed from experienced lawyers, usually after fifteen or more years of practice. In most civil-law countries, no practice is required — France, Japan and South Korea select judges young, straight from law studies, through a competitive examination and a state judicial school. England also uses roughly 12,000 lay magistrates with no law degree at all for minor cases.

In career judiciaries the route is fast: a French law graduate who passes the École nationale de la magistrature entrance exam can be sitting as a judge around age 27, nine years after leaving school. In common-law systems the bench comes late — a law degree, bar qualification and typically fifteen to twenty-five years of practice first, so most judges are appointed in their forties or fifties.

Mostly appointed — by independent commissions in the UK, by the executive with legislative confirmation for US federal judges, by judicial councils in much of Europe, by the collegium of senior judges in India. The great exception is the American states: 39 of the 50 use elections for at least some judgeships, a practice most other democracies deliberately avoid for fear of campaign money influencing rulings.

Well, but usually less than the top lawyers who appear before them. A US federal district judge earned $243,300 in 2024; a UK High Court judge about £232,000; an Australian Federal Court judge roughly A$490,000; a German judge starts near €60,000. In India a Supreme Court justice's base salary is about ₹30 lakh a year plus housing — many senior advocates earn that in a week.

It depends entirely on the country. In England and Wales, magistrates are unpaid volunteers without law degrees who decide over 90 percent of criminal cases. In the United States, magistrate judges are salaried lawyers handling preliminary federal matters. In France, magistrat covers both judges and prosecutors, trained together at the same school. The words do not translate cleanly between systems — a frequent source of confusion.

Deliberately, only with great difficulty — that is the point of judicial independence. Since England's Act of Settlement of 1701, judges in most democracies hold office during good behaviour and can be removed only for serious misconduct through a special process. In the United States, only eight federal judges have ever been removed, each by Senate conviction after impeachment. An unpopular ruling is never lawful grounds.