Skip to content Skip to a section

🐅Conservation pressure

Tiger · Asia largest cat — subspecies maps, 1973 Project Tiger, and roughly 4,000 remaining wild animals still frame a century of recovery arithmetic.

At a glance
Score intensity

Darker cells mean a higher score for this topic on that metric.

Last reviewed Sources & creditsMedia creditsMethodology

Quick answers

How many wild tigers are left?

Global estimates in the 2020s sit near 4,000-5,500 depending on the year and method. India holds the majority. The number is a camera-trap product, not a Victorian hunter tale.

Did Project Tiger work?

India wild counts rose from a 1970s crisis to the largest national population. Methods changed (pugmarks to cameras), so the graph is not a single instrument. Southeast Asia did not copy the rebound.

What was Tx2?

A 2010 pledge by tiger-range states in St Petersburg to double wild numbers by 2022. Some countries gained; others lost. The slogan outlived the deadline.

Why not score tigers and lions the same?

Lions are Vulnerable with a wider African footprint and a tiny Gir relic. Tigers are Endangered, more forest-bound, and culturally heavier in South and East Asia. Scores stay relative across all 24 types.

Who was Jim Corbett in this story?

A hunter of man-eaters who wrote Man-Eaters of Kumaon (1944) and later lent his name to India first national park -- a colonial-to-reserve arc.

Are Siberian tigers a separate conservation?

Panthera tigris tigris now lumps many mainland tigers in some taxonomies; Amur animals still have a Russian-Chinese border programme and a different prey winter.

IUCN: Endangered

The tiger future is a triad of climate, take and attention -- not a product roadmap.

Risk scores here track conservation pressure relative to other types. High resilience types sit in a calmer band; CR/EN types do not.

Conservation risk

90 / 100
critical pressure

Tiger sits in a critical pressure band in this atlas (resilience 14/100). Endangered. Wild numbers rose in India after Project Tiger (1973) and Tx2 pledges (2010); Southeast Asian and South China lineages did not share that graph.

Teaching snapshot as of September 2026 — not a live IUCN feed.

Safeguards

Listing and enforcement

CITES, ESA, RFMOs and national parks only work when patrols and papers move.

Site protection

A breeding lake, ice type or cavity tree cannot be replaced by a logo.

Prey and forage base

Seals, krill, ungulates, bamboo and sardines are the quiet half of the tiger budget.

Disease and toxin watch

Ebola, KHV, TTX, lead and rodenticides are type-specific ceilings.

English-language science capacity

The field sites in the techDeep lens still train the next census -- they are a safeguard only if funded.

What monitoring automates first

Census and acoustics

Camera traps, radar and moorings already take hours that used to be only notebooks.

Trade-document checks

eBCD and permit databases can flag a loin or a skin faster than a paper file.

Outbreak mapping

Flu and Ebola desks now run on shared dashboards -- still needing a human closer.

Visitor flow

Ticketing and hide cameras can be scheduled; habituation ethics cannot be fully automated.

Structural shifts

Climate as habitat law

Ice, bleach and river heat are now listing factors, not background weather.

From fortress to corridor

National parks plus gene flow -- panda belts, tiger landscapes, wolf packs on roads.

Fame as a take risk

Nemo, Jaws, Koko and Cecil still move capture, fear and donations in the same year.

English science is not the range

The localLens is a reading aid. Range-state languages still hold the living animal.

Outlook

Near term

Expect more listings, more cameras and more conflict paperwork -- not a sudden best-species ending.

Medium term

Sites that keep forage and enforcement will hold; single-lake and single-forest types stay brittle.

Long view

The tiger body plan will remain recognisable. The map of secure versus threatened populations will not.

Keep exploring

More in Wildlife