Skip to content Skip to a section
🏭 Bhopal disaster

Bhopal timeline 1969–2010

From the UCIL plant through the 1984 leak, the 1989 settlement, the 1996 charge cut and the 2010 verdict.

At a glance
Score intensity

Darker cells mean a higher score for this topic on that metric.

Last reviewed Sources & creditsMedia creditsMethodology

Quick answers

What leaked at Bhopal?

Methyl isocyanate from a storage tank at the UCIL pesticide plant on the night of 2–3 December 1984. The page does not discuss how to handle or release the chemical. The public fact is an uncontrolled urban exposure.

How many people died?

The official immediate death toll often cited is 2,259. Indian government statements later used about 3,500 deaths in the first days and more than 15,000 gas-related deaths over the following years. Campaign estimates run higher. All of these are dated published figures, not a single census.

What was the 1989 settlement?

UCC paid US$470 million to the Union of India under Supreme Court orders of 14–15 February 1989 to resolve civil claims. Criminal proceedings were first quashed and later revived. Distribution of the money to claimants took years and remains criticised.

Who was convicted?

On 7 June 2010 a Bhopal court convicted seven former UCIL officials, including chairman Keshub Mahindra, and the Indian company of causing death by negligence (IPC 304A) and related counts. Sentences were two years and fines. An eighth accused had died. Warren Anderson was not in the dock.

Why is the status “mixed”?

Civil claims were settled; criminal law produced only negligence convictions of Indian employees; the American parent executive was never tried in India; the factory site’s contamination file is not closed. Those outcomes do not add to a single word like convicted or closed.

What Indian laws followed?

The 1985 claims-processing Act, the Environment (Protection) Act 1986 and the Public Liability Insurance Act 1991. Together they centralised claimant representation, environmental rule-making and no-fault industrial insurance.

1984Bhopal, Indiamixed

Start with this section - Timeline

1984

The release lasts hours. The docket lasts decades.

English anniversary timelines often jump from 1984 to 1989 and omit the 1996 reduction that explains the 2010 sentence length.

Timeline

JanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Evidence timeline
19691979–802–3 Dec 1984Dec 19841985198614 Feb 1989199620017 Jun 2010
  1. UCIL plant at Bhopal

    Union Carbide’s Indian subsidiary opens a pesticide works that later adds MIC production.

  2. MIC unit in service

    Local storage of methyl isocyanate begins, tying the city’s risk to a single intermediate.

  3. Tank 610 release

    MIC escapes over adjoining wards. Official immediate deaths are later put at 2,259.

  4. Anderson arrested, released

    The UCC chief executive’s short detention and departure become a lasting extradition file.

  5. Claims Act

    Parliament makes the Union of India the exclusive representative of gas-leak claimants.

  6. Environment (Protection) Act

    Central environmental legislation is enacted in the disaster’s aftermath.

  7. $470 million settlement

    The Supreme Court records UCC’s payment and, at first, also quashes criminal cases.

  8. Charges reduced to 304A

    The Supreme Court holds that Indian accused may be tried for death by negligence, not culpable homicide.

  9. Dow acquires UCC

    The successor company inherits the argument over whether any parent duty remains.

  10. Bhopal convictions

    Seven UCIL officials and the Indian company receive two-year terms under IPC 304A and related sections.

Claim versus timeline

Each public-record claim on this dossier sits beside the timeline chapter already on the page.

Public-record encyclopedia. Not legal advice, not a how-to, not a private file.

Claim A single official total is 20,000 dead on the night.

Timeline beat 1969 — UCIL plant at Bhopal

The night-time official figure commonly cited is 2,259. Five-figure totals are later attributions or campaign estimates and must be dated.

Claim No one was ever convicted.

Timeline beat 1979–80 — MIC unit in service

Seven UCIL officials and the Indian company were convicted on 7 June 2010. The sentences were two years under a reduced charge.

Claim The 1989 payment was secretly imposed without a court.

Timeline beat 2–3 Dec 1984 — Tank 610 release

The Supreme Court of India recorded and supervised the settlement, then faced review because criminal cases had been quashed.

Claim The cause of the leak is unknown.

Timeline beat Dec 1984 — Anderson arrested, released

An MIC release from Tank 610 is established. Remaining argument is about water ingress, safeguards and corporate knowledge — not about whether a leak occurred.

Open aftermath myths →

Beat weight marks

Mark each timeline beat already on this dossier as supported, contested or unknown, using the public-record claims already filed here. Not a verdict.

Editorial marks on this device only. Public-record encyclopedia — not legal advice, not a how-to, not a private file.

Timeline beatSupported / Contested / Unknown
1969 — UCIL plant at Bhopal

Claim already on file: A single official total is 20,000 dead on the night.

1979–80 — MIC unit in service

Claim already on file: No one was ever convicted.

2–3 Dec 1984 — Tank 610 release

Claim already on file: The 1989 payment was secretly imposed without a court.

Dec 1984 — Anderson arrested, released

Claim already on file: The cause of the leak is unknown.

1985 — Claims Act

Claim already on file: The cause of the leak is unknown.

1986 — Environment (Protection) Act

Claim already on file: The cause of the leak is unknown.

14 Feb 1989 — $470 million settlement

Claim already on file: The cause of the leak is unknown.

1996 — Charges reduced to 304A

Claim already on file: The cause of the leak is unknown.

2001 — Dow acquires UCC

Claim already on file: The cause of the leak is unknown.

7 Jun 2010 — Bhopal convictions

Claim already on file: The cause of the leak is unknown.

After 2010 the criminal file against those Indian accused is a judgment. The site file is not.

Public-record encyclopedia. Not legal advice. Not a how-to. Graphic detail is withheld. Wars belong in a separate atlas.

Related cases