Darker cells mean a higher score for this topic on that metric.
LessMore
Last reviewed Sources & creditsMedia creditsMethodology
Quick answers
Does this atlas rank groups by IQ, race or nation?
No. Pathways and evidence stay individual. Scores are browsing aids — never group biological or racial ranks.
Did Gardner refute g?
He argued g was too narrow for a human-worth story. He did not make the intercorrelations among tests disappear. Spearman’s positive manifold remains a psychometric fact.
What did Waterhouse 2006 argue?
That MI lacks the cognitive-neuroscience and psychometric support a new theory of intelligence would need, and that schools adopted it ahead of the evidence.
What did Visser, Ashton and Vernon 2006 find?
Tasks written to tap Gardner’s intelligences still loaded on general and broad factors rather than eight independent IQs.
Is MI the same as learning styles?
Gardner has rejected the popular “teach to visual/auditory styles” version. MI is about domains of competence, not preferred input channels — though schools often mash the two.
Why do teachers still like it?
It licenses music, movement and social work as serious. That institutional use can be good even if the psychometrics are thin.
Signs of multiple intelligences are cues for curiosity, not a diagnosis and not a caste stamp.
Tests measure a sample already shaped by teaching and invitation. False positives are part of the identification problem.
Early cues
- 4–6 — Domain-specific hunger — A child builds for hours and barely talks, or the reverse. Unevenness is common.
- 7–9 — School honours one symbol — Print and number crowd out music and making — the complaint that made MI popular.
- 10–13 — Club identities — Orchestra, workshop, debate. Profiles become public.
- 14–17 — Forced ranking — A single GPA can hide a spatial or interpersonal strength.
- Adult — Career mismatch — People discover a valued intelligence late because school never assessed it.
Tests & tasks
- Project Spectrum activities — Early MI classroom assessments — rich, hard to standardise.
- Standard batteries — Still organised by g and broad abilities (Cattell–Horn–Carroll), not eight Gardner IQs.
- Domain performance — A recital, a design critique, a lab notebook — honest measures of those crafts.
- Learning-style quizzes — Not MI, often invalid, frequently confused with Gardner.
Environments
- Several symbol systems in the week — Music, making, talk, number — the practical MI timetable.
- Exhibition of work — Renzulli-like products instead of a single percentile.
- No fake eight-score report card — Do not invent thermometers the psychometrics do not support.
- Honest g literacy for staff — Teachers can value many domains and still know tests intercorrelate.
False positives
- Eight-box report cards — A colourful checklist is not eight intelligences measured.
- Learning-styles mashup — “Visual learner” is a different, weaker claim.
- Avoiding hard symbol systems — Using MI to excuse never teaching maths or writing.
- New caste of “body-smart” — Labels can track stereotypes (especially gender and class) as easily as IQ did.
Multiple intelligences: a cue is information. A label without a review date is a caste.
OriginsScienceSignsDevelopPracticeExemplarsMyths In this language region