Darker cells mean a higher score for this topic on that metric.
LessMore
Last reviewed Sources & creditsMedia creditsMethodology
Quick answers
Does this atlas rank groups by IQ, race or nation?
No. Pathways and evidence stay individual. Scores are browsing aids — never group biological or racial ranks.
Did Gardner refute g?
He argued g was too narrow for a human-worth story. He did not make the intercorrelations among tests disappear. Spearman’s positive manifold remains a psychometric fact.
What did Waterhouse 2006 argue?
That MI lacks the cognitive-neuroscience and psychometric support a new theory of intelligence would need, and that schools adopted it ahead of the evidence.
What did Visser, Ashton and Vernon 2006 find?
Tasks written to tap Gardner’s intelligences still loaded on general and broad factors rather than eight independent IQs.
Is MI the same as learning styles?
Gardner has rejected the popular “teach to visual/auditory styles” version. MI is about domains of competence, not preferred input channels — though schools often mash the two.
Why do teachers still like it?
It licenses music, movement and social work as serious. That institutional use can be good even if the psychometrics are thin.
Development here follows Gagné-like honesty: aptitudes, practice and catalysts. Multiple intelligences is not a finished essence.
Windows differ by domain. A closed sport window is not a closed writing window. Read the clocks.
Stages
- List valued domains
What the school actually honours.
Taxonomy first.
- Put work in each
A product, not a quiz.
Spectrum’s spirit.
- Refuse fake IQs
No eight-number printout.
Waterhouse’s warning.
- Teach the hard symbols too
MI is not an opt-out from print and number.
Equity includes access to g-loaded skills.
- Read one critique
Waterhouse 2006 or Visser 2006.
Staff literacy.
- Keep the timetable wide
The lasting institutional gain.
Use, not theory victory.
Levers
- Timetable share — Minutes for music and making are the real policy.
- Exhibition culture — Work shown, not only tested.
- Staff psychometrics literacy — g and MI can be taught as different kinds of claim.
- Anti-stereotype review — Who gets called bodily-kinesthetic or interpersonal?
- Link to identification — Domain talent searches beat a single GATE score — without eight fake IQs.
Windows
- Early childhood Spectrum-style — Many materials before one symbol dominates.
- Primary arts entitlement — The years MI most wanted to protect.
- Secondary specialisation — Profiles narrow; the taxonomy still names what was dropped.
- Adult second domains — People add a neglected intelligence later; school is not the last word.
Supports
- Project Zero archives — The institutional home of the idea.
- Korea 예고 / arts high schools — A system that already treats arts as official intelligences — without needing Gardner’s psychometrics.
- Finland arts in comprehensive years — Breadth as default, not a poster.
- CHC training for psychologists — So MI is not the only “multiple” story they know.
Multiple intelligences: catalysts and windows do the daily work. Destiny talk is the failure mode.
OriginsScienceSignsDevelopPracticeExemplarsMyths In this language region