Last reviewed Sources & creditsMedia creditsMethodology
Quick answers
Why do curlers sweep the ice in front of the stone?
Sweeping briefly melts the frozen droplets, called pebble, that cover a curling sheet, creating a microscopic film of water that reduces friction under the stone. Two things follow. The stone travels further, by several metres if it is swept hard for its whole journey, and it curls less, holding a straighter line. Sweepers are therefore correcting two errors at once: a shot thrown a little light can be carried to the target, and a shot drifting too wide can be kept straight. The skip watches from the house and calls when to sweep; the sweepers judge speed themselves, usually against a stopwatch time taken between the hog lines.
What is the hammer and why does everyone talk about it?
The hammer is the last stone of an end, and having it is worth roughly a point at elite level because you get to react to everything the opposition has already done. It is decided before the game by the last stone draw, where each team throws to the button and the closer average wins, and after that it goes to whichever team did not score in the previous end. That rule is the strategic heart of curling: scoring a single point with the hammer is often a bad outcome, because you hand last stone back for only one point. Teams would rather blank the end, keep the hammer, and try again for two.
Why does a curling stone curl?
Because it is released with a slow rotation, two or three turns over its whole 30-metre journey, and that rotation makes it drift sideways by about a metre. The strange part is the direction: a clockwise-rotating stone curls to the right, which is the opposite of what a spinning ball does on a table. Physicists have argued about the mechanism for decades, with competing explanations involving asymmetric friction at the front and back of the contact ring, and tiny scratches the stone leaves on the pebble that later stones follow. There is still no single accepted theory, which makes curling one of the few sports whose central phenomenon remains genuinely unexplained.
Are curlers actually athletes?
The delivery itself demands balance, flexibility and repeatable precision rather than power, but sweeping is straightforwardly hard physical work. A sweeper covers a couple of kilometres over a game while pushing down hard on a brush, in short bursts that drive the heart rate close to maximum. Elite teams train for that specifically, with gym programmes built around core stability, single-leg balance and upper-body endurance. The mental load is comparable to golf: every shot is planned, discussed and executed under a running clock, and a world championship is nine days of two-hour games where a centimetre decides the result.
What is mixed doubles and how does it differ?
Mixed doubles is a separate Olympic discipline played by two people, one of each gender, over eight ends instead of ten. Each team delivers five stones rather than eight, and one stone of each colour is placed on the ice before every end, one in the house and one as a guard, so six stones per team are in play. One player throws the first and last stone of the end, the other the middle three, and both sweep. Once per game a team may call a power play, shifting the pre-placed stones to one side of the sheet to open up a bigger score. It is faster, higher scoring and far more volatile than the four-player game.
Where do curling stones come from and why are they expensive?
Nearly all competition stones are cut from one of two granites: Blue Hone and Common Green from Ailsa Craig, an uninhabited islet in the Firth of Clyde, or a granite from the Trefor quarry in north Wales. Ailsa Craig rock is prized because it absorbs almost no water, so it does not crack when repeatedly frozen and thawed. The island is a bird sanctuary, so quarrying happens rarely and in bulk, with a 2,000-tonne harvest in 2013 and another in 2020, and Kays of Scotland has held exclusive rights for well over a century. A matched set of sixteen championship stones costs several thousand pounds but lasts for decades.
Curling in the mid-2020s is being pulled in two directions at once. Rule-makers keep intervening to make ends messier and comebacks more plausible, while the competitive elite keeps getting more precise and more data-driven. Add a generational handover at the very top and a qualification system being rebuilt from scratch, and the sport looks less static than at any point since the free guard zone arrived.
Key numbers
Trends
Rule changes engineered against the blank end
The governing bodies have spent a decade deliberately making it harder to keep the sheet clean. The five-rock free guard zone, adopted for 2018-19 after the Grand Slam circuit trialled it from 2014, protected one more early stone than the old four-rock rule and immediately increased the number of stones left in play at the end of an end. When teams responded by ticking centre guards sideways rather than removing them, World Curling introduced the no-tick rule for international events, adopted by Curling Canada for 2023-24 and since folded into the general rules of play. The intent is explicitly commercial as well as sporting: more stones in play means more steals, more comebacks and fewer games conceded in the sixth end, which matters for a sport whose economics depend heavily on television. The trade-off, argued about constantly among elite skips, is that strategy has narrowed, because the aggressive centre-line game is now the correct answer far more often than it used to be.
Mixed doubles as the globalisation engine
Mixed doubles has done more to spread curling internationally in fifteen years than the four-player game managed in a century. It requires two athletes rather than five, eight ends rather than ten, and far less ice time, so a federation with a single club can field a competitive pair. The growth is measurable at the qualifying stage: a record 33 teams entered the 2026 World Mixed Doubles Qualification Event, against a previous high of 29 in 2024, and the championship proper now runs at twenty nations. Olympic inclusion from PyeongChang 2018 supplied the funding argument that national committees needed. It has also produced the sport's most unexpected result of the era, Italy's Stefania Constantini and Amos Mosaner going unbeaten to gold in Beijing 2022, and at Milano Cortina 2026 the discipline delivered a first Olympic gold for a Swedish brother-and-sister pair, Rasmus and Isabella Wrana, over an American team.
Shot data and win-probability modelling
Curling has graded every stone at championship level for decades, scoring each shot from 0 to 4 against the call the skip made, which gives the sport an unusually rich historical dataset for something so low-tech. That data is now being used the way baseball uses run expectancy. Win-probability tables for common endgame states, including whether to blank, take one, or gamble for two, are published and studied, and the value of the hammer with a given number of ends remaining is quantified rather than assumed. Teams and national programmes use shot-level percentages for selection, and broadcast graphics now show cumulative team percentages in real time. The visible effect is a more standardised endgame: skips increasingly make the same call in the same situation because the numbers say so, which some coaches argue has stripped a layer of individual character out of the game.
Equipment frozen by design after Broomgate
The 2015-16 season nearly broke the sport. Brush heads made from directional fabrics could steer a running stone and hold it up, to the point that a single sweeper could move a rock several feet sideways, which made the accuracy of the throw close to irrelevant. Teams reached informal agreements mid-tournament to stop using them, World Curling imposed a moratorium in November 2015, and a testing summit in Kemptville, Ontario, in May 2016 examined more than fifty brush heads using robots and tracking equipment with help from Canada's National Research Council. The resolution was radical for a modern sport: from 2016-17, only a single approved fabric may be used in sanctioned play. Curling deliberately froze its equipment technology to protect the primacy of the delivery, and the decision has held for a decade with almost no serious challenge.
A generational handover at the top
The 2025-26 season removed three of the era's defining figures within months. Niklas Edin retired in May 2026 after winning a record eighth world title, Silvana Tirinzoni announced her retirement that summer having skipped the only women's team to win four consecutive world championships, and Jennifer Jones had already played her final four-player game in 2024. Alina Patz is returning to skipping her own rink, and the men's field has already reorganised around Bruce Mouat, world champion in 2025 and Olympic silver medallist in 2026, and Canada's Brad Jacobs, who became the first male skip with two Olympic golds at Milano Cortina. On the women's side Rachel Homan remains the benchmark, with Switzerland's Xenia Schwaller winning the 2026 world title at 26. Roughly a decade of settled hierarchy has been dismantled in a single year.
Rebuilding the road to the world championship
World Curling is redesigning how teams qualify for its flagship events. The Pan Continental Championships, created in 2022 by merging the Pacific-Asia Championships with the Americas Challenge, ran for the last time in 2025 and is being replaced by World Curling Championship B and C divisions from the 2026-27 season. The intent is a single global ladder with promotion and relegation, modelled on the European Championships' long-standing divisional structure, rather than separate regional routes of very different difficulty. For established nations the change is administrative; for the 74 member associations further down the list it is the difference between a plausible pathway and none at all, and it arrives as membership continues to expand, with Monaco joining in 2024 after Pakistan, Puerto Rico and the Philippines in 2023.
Granite supply and the cost of a stone
Almost every stone used in serious competition comes from one of two places: Ailsa Craig, the volcanic islet in the Firth of Clyde, or the Trefor quarry in north Wales. Ailsa Craig supplies the prized Blue Hone, a granite so dense that it absorbs almost no water and therefore resists the freeze-thaw damage that destroys lesser rock, and Kays of Scotland has held exclusive quarrying rights there since the nineteenth century. Because the island is a bird sanctuary, extraction happens rarely and in bulk: a 2013 harvest took 2,000 tonnes, enough to cover anticipated orders for years, with another in 2020. A matched set of sixteen championship stones runs to thousands of pounds and lasts decades if maintained, which makes ice-time cost, not stone cost, the real barrier for new clubs.
Club economics and ice time
The sport's quiet structural problem is that curling needs a dedicated sheet of pebbled ice held at a precise temperature, which is expensive to run and cannot easily share a facility with other users. Energy costs and ageing arena plant have squeezed small clubs across Canada, Scotland and the American Midwest, the three regions with the deepest grassroots base, while newer federations often depend on rented time in figure-skating or hockey rinks where the ice is far from ideal. The counterweight has been a wave of urban curling clubs marketed to newcomers on short introductory leagues rather than full-season membership, and a post-Olympic participation spike that reliably follows every Winter Games. World Curling puts global registered participation at roughly 1.5 million, a figure that has been broadly stable while the geographic spread has widened considerably.
Outlook
The direction of travel is clear enough. The rule-makers will keep tuning the free guard zone until the blank end is a genuine rarity, and the qualification pyramid being built for 2026-27 is designed to feed more nations into the top division rather than protect the incumbents. Mixed doubles will keep carrying the sport into countries that cannot field four elite players, and its Olympic status guarantees it funding that the four-player game in those nations does not have. Expect the world championship fields to look less Canadian and less Scandinavian by the early 2030s.
The open question is whether the professional layer can support itself outside Canada. The Grand Slam circuit remains overwhelmingly Canadian in location even as its entry lists globalise, and European stars have to travel to earn. If a genuinely international tour emerges, curling gains a year-round economy; if it does not, the sport stays what it has been since 1998, a discipline that captivates a very large audience for two weeks every four years and then returns to its clubs. Either way, the fundamentals are unusually robust: cheap to play, easy to understand, and almost always decided by the final stone.
Keep exploring
More in this category
Golf
A six-century test of nerve where the only opponent is the ground, the wind, and yourself.
🎯Darts
A sport played on a target the size of a dinner plate, where the arithmetic never stops and the last dart is always the hardest.
🎱Snooker
Twenty-two balls, six pockets barely wider than they are, and the most pitiless scoreboard in sport.