Skip to content
🚢 Sinking of the Titanic

Titanic evidence and the 1912 record

Wireless logs, boat lists, inquiry transcripts and later wreck imagery that closed the cause-of-loss question.

The 1912 courts worked from testimony, Marconi files and company plans. They did not have the wreck.

After 1985 photography confirmed a hull break and a debris field, without changing the navigational finding.

Exhibits

Exhibit A

British Wreck Commissioner’s report

Inquiry

The 30 July 1912 report and annex fix the position, the 1,490 death figure used here, and the finding of excessive speed in ice. It is the core official British document.

Exhibit B

US Senate testimony

Testimony

Officers, wireless operators, Ismay and passengers were examined from 19 April 1912. The printed hearings remain the earliest long English transcript.

Exhibit C

Marconi traffic

Wireless

Ice warnings, CQD and SOS calls, and Carpathia’s replies show who heard the ship and when. Californian’s silent watch is documented as a staffing custom, not a conspiracy.

Exhibit D

Boatage and passenger lists

Document

White Star and immigration lists, plus boat-capacity tables, underpin class-by-class survival tables. Gaps in steerage names explain why death totals still vary.

Exhibit E

Wreck survey after 1985

Wreck

Two main hull sections and a debris field at about 3,800 metres match a break-up during the sinking. Plate and rivet studies refine, rather than replace, the 1912 flooding story.

Exhibit F

Ice Patrol and SOLAS texts

Statute

The 1914 convention and Ice Patrol agreements are the legal after-image of the evidence: boats for all, radio watches and ice reporting as standing duties.

How strong is the record?

Cause consensus
92

Iceberg collision and progressive flooding are not seriously contested.

1912 documentary file
88

Two inquiries, wireless logs and company plans form a thick contemporary file.

Death-toll precision
72

Mersey’s 1,490 is official; other 1912 and later counts differ by tens to low hundreds.

Wreck forensics
80

Photography and limited recovery confirm break-up; deep salvage remains restricted.

The case is evidence-rich for a 1912 wreck. Remaining arguments are about metallurgy and memory, not about whether the ship hit ice.

Public-record encyclopedia. Not legal advice. Not a how-to. Graphic detail is withheld. Wars belong in a separate atlas.

Related cases