Skip to content
📂 Panama Papers

Panama Papers investigation

How Süddeutsche Zeitung, ICIJ and national agencies worked the Mossack Fonseca leak after 2016.

There are two investigations: a journalistic consortium before 3 April 2016, and state inquiries after.

Neither is a manual for hiding money. Both are after-the-fact readings of a leaked archive.

Agencies

What followed

  1. Receive and secure the cache

    Süddeutsche authenticated a sample and decided the store was too large and too global for one newsroom.

  2. Build a consortium

    ICIJ invited partners, set an embargo and let local desks read local names against public records.

  3. Publish on one clock

    3 April 2016 put governments in the position of responding to the same facts on the same morning.

  4. Open national files

    Tax agencies and prosecutors decided, country by country, whether a name was a lead or a legal structure.

  5. Litigate the hardest cases

    Pakistan's court track and assorted European files produced the mixed dock. Many names never entered a courtroom.

  6. Watch the firm close

    Mossack Fonseca's 2018 shutdown ended a corporate chapter without ending every client inquiry.

Turning points

After the fact, reporters mapped a firm and states picked at the map. The world did not sit as one jury.

Public-record encyclopedia. Not legal advice. Not a how-to. Graphic detail is withheld. Wars belong in a separate atlas.

Related cases