Skip to content
📂 Panama Papers

Panama Papers aftermath

What remains open about John Doe and unfinished inquiries, and which myths English coverage still repeats.

The publication event is closed. The source's name and many national files are not.

English folklore still treats every listed company as a stolen suitcase.

Still open

Myth vs record

Every name in the Papers is a criminal.

Many offshore structures are legal. The files show use of a firm. Courts decide offences.

The leak was a US intelligence operation.

No public record establishes that. The known path is John Doe to Süddeutsche to ICIJ. Rival states have alleged plots; they have not replaced that path.

Mossack Fonseca was the world's only offshore firm.

It was a large one. Later leaks named other intermediaries. Panama is a chapter, not the whole industry.

A film is the record.

The Laundromat is drama. ICIJ stories and official inquiries are the file.

Local notes

London and the property frame

British English often read the Papers through Mayfair flats and Cameron's family file — a local lens on a global cache.

US tax-haven feature English

American papers treated it as a long investigation package more than as a resignation at home. No US president fell.

Journalism-school method talk

English-language reporting programmes teach the embargoed consortium as the lesson, sometimes more than any single politician's fall.

The Panama Papers remain a mixed global file: a documented leak, uneven courts and a source still called John Doe.

Public-record encyclopedia. Not legal advice. Not a how-to. Graphic detail is withheld. Wars belong in a separate atlas.

Related cases