Skip to content Skip to a section

🏃Trends

Track & Field · Faster, higher, stronger — the oldest contest in sport, settled in seconds and centimetres.

Last reviewed Sources & creditsMedia creditsMethodology

Quick answers

What is the difference between 'athletics' and 'track and field'?

They are largely the same sport under two names. 'Athletics' is the international and British term, used by the governing body World Athletics, and it encompasses everything from stadium track and field to road running, cross country and race walking. 'Track and field' is the American term and refers more specifically to the stadium events: the track races — sprints, middle distance, distance, hurdles and relays — and the field events, the jumps and throws contested on the infield. In practice, when Americans say 'track and field' and the rest of the world says 'athletics', they usually mean the same collection of running, jumping and throwing events that form the core Olympic programme.

What are the main events in track and field?

The sport divides into five families. Sprints cover the 100m, 200m and 400m, plus the sprint relays. Middle and long distance runs from 800m through 1500m, 5000m and 10,000m to the marathon, with the 3000m steeplechase as a specialist event. Hurdles include the 110m (100m for women) and the 400m hurdles. The jumps are long jump, triple jump, high jump and pole vault. The throws are shot put, discus, hammer and javelin. Finally, the combined events — the men's decathlon and women's heptathlon — package several of these together over two days. Road running and race walking round out the full athletics programme beyond the stadium.

Who is the fastest human ever?

Usain Bolt of Jamaica holds the men's 100m world record at 9.58 seconds, set at the 2009 Berlin World Championships, and the 200m record at 19.19 seconds from the same meeting — both untouched for over fifteen years. During that 100m he reached a peak speed of around 44 km/h. On the women's side, Florence Griffith-Joyner's 10.49 seconds from 1988 remains the oldest and most debated sprint record, with her 200m mark of 21.34 also still standing. Bolt is almost universally regarded as the fastest human who has ever been reliably timed, and no active sprinter has come especially close to his records.

What is the false start rule?

Since 2010, a single false start means immediate disqualification, with no warning — a stricter rule introduced to speed up televised sprint starts and end the gamesmanship of deliberate early moves. A start is judged false if an athlete leaves the blocks before the gun or reacts within 0.100 seconds of it, since sports science holds that no human can hear and react faster than that. The rule most famously caught Usain Bolt, who was disqualified from the 100m final at the 2011 World Championships. Combined events such as the decathlon retain a one-warning system, reflecting the different demands on multi-event athletes across a long competition.

Why do Kenyan and Ethiopian runners dominate distance events?

It is a combination of factors rather than any single gene. Many top runners come from highland regions above 2,000 metres, where a lifetime at altitude boosts oxygen-carrying capacity. A culture of running long distances to school from childhood builds an aerobic base early, and specific East African populations appear to have physiological advantages such as slender lower limbs that make running economical. Crucially, the economic incentive is enormous: prize money and appearance fees from major marathons can transform a runner's family, drawing huge numbers into the sport and creating fierce competition. Training hubs like Iten in Kenya concentrate talent, coaching and pacing partners, producing a self-reinforcing cycle of excellence.

What are super-shoes, and are they legal?

Super-shoes are running shoes that combine a stiff carbon-fibre plate with a thick layer of lightweight, highly responsive foam, a design popularised by Nike's Vaporfly from 2017. Together they store and return energy and reduce the muscular cost of running, improving economy by an estimated 4 percent — enough to have driven marathon and distance records sharply downward. They are legal, but regulated: World Athletics caps the sole thickness (40mm for road shoes, less for track spikes), limits shoes to a single plate, and requires that models be available to all athletes rather than being one-off prototypes. Critics argue the shoes distort record comparisons across eras; supporters point out that the technology is on sale to anyone.

Start with this section - Trends

Athletics enters the late 2020s pulled in several directions at once: technology is rewriting its record book, new money is testing its traditions, and old questions about doping and eligibility refuse to resolve. The sport remains the numerical heart of the Olympics, but it is scrambling to build a business that holds attention in the years between. The trends below are the ones with the leverage to define its next decade.

Key numbers

214
World Athletics member federations
$50,000
Paris 2024 Olympic gold prize (a sporting first)
2:22 faster
Men's marathon WR cut in the super-shoe era
190+
Men to break 10.00s in the 100m (all-time)
~7 years
Russia's suspension from world athletics

Trends

The super-shoe revolution

The single biggest change to distance running in a generation arrived in 2017, when Nike's Vaporfly paired a curved carbon-fibre plate with a thick slab of ultra-responsive foam. The energy return was worth an estimated 4 percent in running economy, and the record book capsized: the men's marathon world record, which had stood at 2:02:57 before the shoes arrived, fell to 2:00:35 by 2023, and road records tumbled at every distance. World Athletics responded with rules capping sole stack height — 40mm for road shoes, less for track spikes — and banning one-off prototypes, but did not ban the technology itself. Critics call it 'technological doping'; defenders note the shoes are on sale to everyone. The plates have since migrated into track spikes, helping rewrite distance records on the oval too. The debate over where legitimate equipment ends and mechanical assistance begins is now permanent.

Wavelight and the assisted-record era

Distance world records used to depend on a brave pacemaker and a stadium clock; now they are chased against a moving string of green lights. The Wavelight system, embedded in the inside curb of the track and introduced around 2020, pulses LED lights around the rail at exactly world-record pace, giving runners a visible target to chase and crowds something to watch. Combined with super-spikes and carefully assembled pacing fields, it has helped produce a wave of distance records, and it has sharpened the old argument about how much of a performance belongs to the athlete. Purists worry that record-hunting has become a manufactured, almost laboratory exercise, engineered by promoters at a handful of fast meetings. Supporters counter that pacing lights simply externalise the judgement runners have always relied on, and make the pursuit of records legible to a television audience.

Athletes finally get paid

Athletics has always struggled to pay its stars between Olympics, and 2024-25 brought two attempts to fix that. World Athletics became the first international federation to award Olympic prize money, paying 50,000 dollars to each individual gold medallist at Paris 2024 and promising to extend payments to all three medal places by Los Angeles 2028 — a decision that broke with Olympic tradition and irritated other sports. Separately, sprint legend Michael Johnson launched Grand Slam Track in 2025, a big-money circuit designed to pit the best against the best more often, though it hit financial turbulence in its debut season. Both reflect the same problem: outside a handful of marathon and Diamond League paydays, even world-class athletes can struggle to earn a living, and the sport is finally experimenting with ways to keep talent in track rather than losing it to other careers.

The Integrity Unit and the long doping war

No sport has fought performance-enhancing drugs longer or more publicly than athletics, and the fight defines its modern governance. The independent Athletics Integrity Unit, created in 2017, runs testing and prosecutions at arm's length from the federation, and the biological passport tracks athletes' blood values over time to catch doping indirectly. The defining case remains Russia, whose federation was suspended in late 2015 after evidence of a state-run doping programme and stayed barred for over seven years, its athletes competing as neutrals. Kenya's marathon scene has since drawn intense scrutiny, with dozens of runners sanctioned and the country placed under a special testing programme. The stakes are existential: because athletics is measured against absolute records, a single doped mark can poison an event's history for decades, which is why enforcement — and the suspicion that shadows every breakthrough performance — sits at the centre of the sport.

The gender-eligibility debate

Few debates in sport are as fraught as athletics' rules on sex, testosterone and eligibility in the women's category. Since 2018 World Athletics has required athletes with certain differences of sex development to lower their natural testosterone to compete in some women's events — regulations that sidelined double Olympic 800m champion Caster Semenya, whose long legal fight reached the European Court of Human Rights. In 2023 the federation tightened the rules further and effectively barred transgender women who had experienced male puberty from the female category, and in 2025 it moved toward a one-time genetic screening to establish eligibility. Supporters argue the measures protect fair competition for women; opponents call them discriminatory and scientifically contested. The issue pits two principles the sport holds dear — inclusion and a level playing field — against each other, with no resolution that satisfies everyone in sight.

New formats for new audiences

Facing an ageing television audience and fierce competition for attention, athletics is experimenting with its presentation. The mixed 4x400m relay, with two men and two women per team, debuted at the 2020 Olympics and has become a genuine highlight. Meets are being pulled out of half-empty stadiums into city centres — pole vault in a town square, shot put on a downtown platform, street sprints — to bring the action to spectators. Broadcasts are adding live data, on-athlete cameras and shorter, punchier formats aimed at younger, phone-first viewers. World Athletics has floated everything from a revamped world ranking to knockout-style meet formats, while the Diamond League continually tweaks its programme to fit tighter TV windows. The tension is familiar: how to modernise the show without cheapening the events, and how to win back casual fans who tune in only every four years for the Olympics.

East African dominance and the talent map

The geography of distance running has narrowed to a remarkable degree. Kenyan and Ethiopian runners now win the overwhelming majority of major marathons and global distance medals, a dominance built on a potent mix of altitude — training bases sit above 2,000m — a deep culture of running to school, physiological advantages, and above all the economic incentive of races that can transform a family's fortunes. The Rift Valley town of Iten has become a global training hub. At the same time the sport's talent map is shifting elsewhere: sprinting has spread beyond the US and Jamaica, throwers are emerging from the Caribbean and eastern Europe, and new distance nations like Uganda, whose Joshua Cheptegei rewrote the 5000m and 10,000m records, are breaking through. The challenge for the sport is to keep that globalisation genuine — supported by testing and development — rather than a story of a few dominant pipelines.

Outlook

The next decade will test whether athletics can convert its quadrennial Olympic spotlight into a sustainable year-round business. For two weeks every four years it commands a global audience no other participation sport can match, and Los Angeles 2028 will stage that spectacle in the sport's most lucrative market. The anxiety is what happens in the 206 weeks in between, when even champions can struggle for income and visibility. The experiments now under way — Olympic prize money, breakaway leagues, city-centre meets, prize-rich marathon series — are all attempts to monetise that attention, and the coming years will reveal whether any of them works or whether the sport remains, financially, a festival that empties out between Games.

The technological and ethical questions will not resolve so cleanly. Super-shoes, pacing lights and ever-faster tracks keep pushing records down while raising the uncomfortable question of how much a modern mark can be compared with an older one. Doping enforcement has grown more sophisticated, but the suspicion it exists to answer never fully lifts. And the eligibility debate over sex and testosterone touches values far beyond sport. What will not change is the thing that has held since 776 BC: the appeal of finding out, under fair and measured conditions, who can run fastest, jump highest and throw furthest. As long as those questions have answers expressed in seconds and centimetres, athletics will endure — arguing, as ever, about exactly what the numbers mean.

Keep exploring

More in this category