Skip to content
⚓ Sinking of MV Sewol

Sewol evidence: AIS, cargo and the hull

Track data, rebuild papers, announcements and the 2017 raised hull that supported the crew convictions.

The criminal file is rich: track, cargo, audio and a recovered ship.

What is thinner is a single agreed minute-by-minute of the first Coast Guard decisions.

Exhibits

Exhibit A

AIS and voyage data

Physical

Track and turn data fix the morning manoeuvre in the Maenggol Channel and the growing list.

Exhibit B

Rebuild and stability papers

Document

Conversion drawings and stability calculations were compared with the ship as sailed. Investigators treated the 2012–13 rebuild as a cause, not a backdrop.

Exhibit C

Cargo and ballast records

Document

Overload and under-ballast findings supported the conclusion that the turn could not be recovered.

Exhibit D

Cabin announcements

Testimony

Survivors and recovered audio established the stay-put instructions that the Supreme Court treated as decisive.

Exhibit E

Raised hull, 2017

Wreck

The intact-enough hull allowed a delayed interior survey and a search for the still missing.

Exhibit F

Gwangju and Supreme Court opinions

Inquiry

The 2015 appellate and final judgments are the legal statement of homicide by wilful negligence.

How strong is the record?

Crew-conduct record
90

Departure without evacuation is densely evidenced and fully tried.

Stability and cargo file
82

Rebuild and load findings are consistent across investigation bodies.

Rescue-command timeline
68

Who could have entered the hull, and when, remains more contested than the capsize physics.

Owner-network paper
60

Chonghaejin’s group structure was partly mapped; Yoo’s death cut a criminal thread.

Evidence was sufficient for a life sentence. It was not sufficient to end argument about the state.

Public-record encyclopedia. Not legal advice. Not a how-to. Graphic detail is withheld. Wars belong in a separate atlas.

Related cases