Skip to content
🖼️ 1911 Mona Lisa theft

1911 Mona Lisa theft evidence

The empty Salon Carré, the Florence authentication, Peruggia's conviction and the 1914 return.

The object was recovered and matched. That is a stronger close than Gardner or Antwerp.

What is thinner is the exact list of any helpers — a side question that does not unpick the conviction.

Exhibits

Exhibit A

Empty-wall reports, 22 August 1911

Press

Paris papers and police notices fix the discovery date and the Salon Carré location. They are the opening exhibit.

Exhibit B

Uffizi authentication, December 1913

Object

Poggi's examination and the Louvre's later confirmation identify the Florence panel as the missing Leonardo.

Exhibit C

Geri correspondence

Document

The dealer's contact with the man offering the picture is the recovery path. It is a paper trail, not a vault tale.

Exhibit D

Florence judgment

Court

Peruggia's conviction and short sentence are the legal close. Patriotic speeches did not become title.

Exhibit E

Apollinaire file

Testimony

The poet's arrest and release document a famous false lead, useful as a caution, not as a second thief.

Exhibit F

1914 return inventories

Document

Louvre receipt of the panel in January 1914 ends the missing-object half of the dossier.

How strong is the record?

Who took the panel
92

Peruggia was convicted; the object was in his offer path.

Object recovered
98

Authenticated in Florence and returned to the Louvre in January 1914.

Wider conspiracy
25

Rumours of masterminds have not replaced the Florence dock.

Fame effect
95

The mass celebrity of the smile is the best-documented cultural result.

Evidence returned a painting and convicted a man. The rest is celebrity history.

Public-record encyclopedia. Not legal advice. Not a how-to. Graphic detail is withheld. Wars belong in a separate atlas.

Related cases