Skip to content
⛵ Mary Celeste

Mary Celeste documents and their limits

Log slate, Dei Gratia boarding notes, Gibraltar salvage paper and why the 1872 derelict still has no cause.

Evidence quality is moderate for a nineteenth-century salvage and poor for a cause-of-loss.

What survives is good enough to reject several fictions and not good enough to name a reason the boat was launched.

Exhibits

Exhibit A

Logbook and slate

Document

The last slate entry of 25 November 1872 near Santa Maria is the final writing from Briggs’s company. It records weather and position, not alarm.

Exhibit B

Deveau’s boarding notes

Testimony

The first-mate account of sails, water, missing boat and remaining stores. It is the primary scene description.

Exhibit C

Cargo survey

Inquiry

Most alcohol barrels intact; a few empty or leaking. Enough to feed a vapour-fear theory, not enough to prove one.

Exhibit D

Gibraltar salvage record

Archive

Solly-Flood’s questions, surveyors’ replies and a reduced award. The docket is the legal heart of the case.

Exhibit E

Hull examination

Physical

Bow marks that the attorney-general hoped were violence and that later survey reading treated as ordinary wear or old damage.

Exhibit F

Conan Doyle’s 1884 text

Literary

A source about English myth, not about 1872. It renamed the ship and added events the court never heard.

How strong is the record?

Cause of abandonment
15

No finding. Vapour, weather and a lost boat remain hypotheses.

Salvage-court paper
70

Depositions and surveys survive in published and archival form.

Fate of the ten people
5

No verified boat landing, wreckage of the yawl or remains.

Fiction versus file
40

Historians can separate Doyle from Deveau; popular English often cannot.

The strongest evidence is evidence of an empty, still-sailable ship. It is not evidence of a crime that a court would take.

Public-record encyclopedia. Not legal advice. Not a how-to. Graphic detail is withheld. Wars belong in a separate atlas.

Related cases