All 1400 essays
1400 reading pieces, each with a name, a number, and a decision. They sit beside the atlas entry. They do not replace it.
- Baby naming in : Godparents and saints
- Brand naming in : Shop signs and hallmarks
- Celebrity influence in : Royal and saint copy
- Character names in : Theophoric and virtue names
- Gender and names in : Saints as sexed pools
- Given names in 313: Christian saint pools
- Identity and names in 1637: Descartes’ “I”
- Meaning and etymology in : Theophoric names
- Name changes in : Enlightenment self-naming
- Name laws in 1538: English parish mandate
- Name trends in 1538: Parish counts
- Naming ceremonies in : Baptismal names
- Nicknames in : Bynames as proto-surnames
- Place names in : Named points on routes
- Sound and phonetics in 400: Cratylus debate
- Surnames in : English hereditary drift
- Unique vs classic in : Small pools
- Usernames in 1970s: Login names
- What makes a good name in : Saint-name economies
- Why names matter in 3000: Named persons in records
- Baby naming in : East Asian lineages
- Brand naming in : Modern trademark statutes
- Celebrity influence in : Film-star given names
- Character names in : Generation poems
- Gender and names in : Civil sex + name
- Given names in 794: Generation characters
- Identity and names in 1792: French revolutionary renaming
- Meaning and etymology in 100: Onomastica and midrash
- Name changes in : Common-law usage
- Name laws in 1804: French civil code influence
- Name trends in 1880: SSA series begins
- Naming ceremonies in : Font + parish book
- Nicknames in : Hypocoristic dictionaries
- Place names in 1086: Domesday toponyms
- Sound and phonetics in 1836: Humboldt on sound
- Surnames in 1492: Iberian two-surname customs
- Unique vs classic in 1880: Mary’s SSA band
- Usernames in 1990s: Email local-parts
- What makes a good name in 794: Chinese generation poems
- Why names matter in 1086: Domesday identifiers
- Baby naming in 1538: Parish then civil birth
- Brand naming in : Coinages (Kodak, Sony)
- Celebrity influence in 1984: Splash / Madison
- Character names in 794: Lineage lists
- Gender and names in : Split U.S. lists
- Given names in 1538: Parish forenames
- Identity and names in 1920s: U.S. immigrant court names
- Meaning and etymology in 1810s: Comparative method
- Name changes in 1875: Meiji registers
- Name laws in 1875: Japanese registers
- Name trends in 1935: Social Security Act era
- Naming ceremonies in 1538: English parish registers
- Nicknames in : Press nicknames
- Place names in : Ordnance and imperial surveys
- Sound and phonetics in 1929: Sapir’s phonetic symbolism
- Surnames in 1875: Japanese surname edicts
- Unique vs classic in 1960s: Longer tails
- Usernames in 1999: Handle culture (forums, AIM, early social)
- What makes a good name in 1870s: Meiji family-name order
- Why names matter in 1538: English parish registers
- Baby naming in 1880: SSA historical series
- Brand naming in 1960s: Naming consultancies
- Celebrity influence in 1990s: SSA web charts
- Character names in 1870s: Meiji surnames + registers
- Gender and names in : Ashley/Leslie-type drifts
- Given names in 1880: SSA series starts
- Identity and names in 1954: Brown-era school rolls
- Meaning and etymology in 1870s: Japanese and Korean modern dictionaries
- Name changes in 1918: Wartime and regime renamings
- Name laws in 1890s: U.S. state change statutes
- Name trends in 1990s: SSA popular website
- Naming ceremonies in : Civil registration
- Nicknames in 1950s: Teen slang waves
- Place names in 1890s: U.S. Board on Geographic Names
- Sound and phonetics in 1929: Köhler’s maluma/takete
- Surnames in 1898: U.S. immigration clerks
- Unique vs classic in 1970s: Creative spelling
- Usernames in 2004: Platform real-name fights
- What makes a good name in 1910s: U.S. Americanisation drives
- Why names matter in 1804: Napoleonic civil status
- Baby naming in : Hanja and hangul options
- Brand naming in 1990s: Domain names
- Celebrity influence in 2000: Lieberson’s caution
- Character names in 1948: Korean hangul-only options
- Gender and names in 1990s: Explicit unisex fashion
- Given names in 1907: ONS-style releases
- Identity and names in 1970s: Women’s surname debates
- Meaning and etymology in : Place-name surveys
- Name changes in 1970s: Feminist keep-or-change
- Name laws in 1991: Icelandic committee statute
- Name trends in 1994: ONS modern releases
- Naming ceremonies in : Hospital births
- Nicknames in 1990s: Email local-parts
- Place names in 1945: Names on the Land
- Sound and phonetics in 2001: Ramachandran & Hubbard
- Surnames in 1930s: Colonial surname projects
- Unique vs classic in 2000: A Matter of Taste
- Usernames in 2006: Twitter-style @names
- What makes a good name in 1970s: Creative spelling boom
- Why names matter in 1880: SSA name files begin
- Baby naming in 1970s: Name-your-baby industry
- Baby naming in 2000: A Matter of Taste
- Brand naming in 2000s: Global class filings
- Brand naming in 2010s: Handle collision
- Celebrity influence in 2010s: Thrones-era coinages
- Celebrity influence in 2010s: K-drama / K-pop export
- Celebrity influence in 2020s: Influencer babies
- Celebrity influence in : Copy the monarch
- Celebrity influence in : Copy the star
- Celebrity influence in : Copy the character
- Celebrity influence in : Copy the feed
- Celebrity influence in : From person to character
- Celebrity influence in : From national star to global stream
- Celebrity influence in : From anecdote to downloadable spike
- Celebrity influence in 2000: Internal fashion (endings, distinction) explains movements that look like copyca
- Character names in 1951: Japanese tōyō/jōyō reforms
- Gender and names in 2000s: Legal challenges
- Gender and names in 2010s: Lived-name + pronoun fields
- Given names in 1948: Korean naming after liberation
- Given names in 2000: Lieberson on forename taste
- Given names in 2003: Forenames as résumé signals
- Given names in : Shared saint pools
- Identity and names in 1990s: Internet handles
- Identity and names in 2003: Résumé names as race cues
- Identity and names in 2010s: Lived-name fields
- Identity and names in : Who your people are
- Meaning and etymology in 1990: Hanks & Hodges
- Meaning and etymology in 2000s: Scraped meaning sites
- Meaning and etymology in 2010s: DNA-kit stories
- Name changes in 1990s: Gender-recognition statutes
- Name changes in 2017: Americanisation paper
- Name changes in 2010s: Used-name fields
- Name changes in : Renaming as domination
- Name laws in 1981s: Jinmeiyō list
- Name laws in 2000s: Spanish surname-order reforms
- Name laws in 2010s: Equality challenges
- Name trends in 2000: A Matter of Taste
- Name trends in 2000s: KOSTAT name tables
- Name trends in 2010s: Scrapers and apps
- Name trends in : Names as counts of persons
- Name trends in : Names as social data
- Name trends in : Names as sport
- Name trends in : Names as feed
- Name trends in : From local gossip to national file
- Name trends in : From paper tables to sortable web
- Name trends in : From national to fake-global
- Name trends in 2000: Endings, imitation and peak avoidance explain much of the SSA-shaped curves.
- Naming ceremonies in : Humanist namings
- Nicknames in 2004: Social display names
- Nicknames in 2010s: Chosen-name badges
- Place names in 1967: UNGEGN
- Place names in 1990s: Post-colonial restorations
- Place names in 2010s: Data-layer wars
- Place names in : Landmark talk
- Place names in : Frozen spellings
- Place names in : Imported commemorations
- Place names in : Dual names and reversions
- Place names in : From description to commemoration
- Place names in : From one official to dual display
- Place names in : From gazetteer to platform
- Place names in : Celtic, Old English, Norse and Norman pieces can sit in one county — a model of
- Sound and phonetics in 2000: Lieberson on endings
- Sound and phonetics in 2012: Laham et al. fluency
- Sound and phonetics in 2010s: Brand sound labs
- Sound and phonetics in : Nature vs convention
- Surnames in 1970s: Women’s surname politics
- Surnames in 2000s: Airline and visa forms
- Surnames in 2010s: Dual-surname experiments
- Surnames in : Situational tags
- Surnames in : Frozen tags
- Unique vs classic in 2004: Fryer & Levitt
- Unique vs classic in 2010s: ONS Oliver/Olivia band
- Unique vs classic in 2010s: Handle uniqueness
- Unique vs classic in : Classic by default
- Unique vs classic in : Classic vs modern
- Unique vs classic in : Unique as mass goal
- Unique vs classic in : Unique as username
- Unique vs classic in : From saint-classic to grandparent-classic
- Unique vs classic in : From rare root to rare spelling
- Unique vs classic in : From legal unique to handle unique
- Unique vs classic in 2000: The unique pole is usually a neighbour of the classic pole, not a different plan
- Usernames in 2010s: Namespace exhaustion
- Usernames in 2010s: Trademark + impersonation rules
- Usernames in 2020s: Portable display names, frozen logins
- What makes a good name in 1991: Icelandic committee statute
- What makes a good name in 2000: A Matter of Taste
- What makes a good name in 2010s: Handle collision
- What makes a good name in : Calendar fit
- Why names matter in 1936: ONS-style counting
- Why names matter in 2000: Lieberson’s taste model
- Why names matter in 2003: Emily and Lakisha
- Why names matter in : Call-names
- Why names matter in : Written identity
- Why names matter in : File names
- Why names matter in : Searchable selves
- Why names matter in : Bynames to hereditary surnames
- Why names matter in : From priest to registrar
- Why names matter in : From local gossip to audit study
- Why names matter in 2003: Identical U.S. résumés with Emily/Greg versus Lakisha/Jamal names received diffe
- Baby naming in 2010s: Group-chat reveals
- Baby naming in : Elders pick
- Brand naming in 2010s: Linguistic disaster headlines
- Celebrity influence in : Some rare names show step-changes after a film or series year — inspect the actu
- Character names in 1981s: Jinmeiyō kanji list
- Gender and names in 2010s: Non-binary registration experiments
- Given names in : Designed cohorts
- Identity and names in : Who the state says you are
- Meaning and etymology in : Meaning as theology
- Name changes in : Use it and it is yours
- Name laws in : Church as registrar
- Name trends in : Mary was the most frequent U.S. girls’ name in many years from 1880 through 1961
- Naming ceremonies in 2000s: Livestream reveals
- Nicknames in 2020s: Moderation fights
- Place names in 1945: A readable synthesis of transfer, commemoration and invention — check later scho
- Sound and phonetics in : Nonce words
- Surnames in : Exported forms
- Unique vs classic in : Later 20th-century U.S. files generally show the top names holding a smaller sha
- Usernames in : IT as namer
- What makes a good name in : Generation fit
- Why names matter in 2000: A Matter of Taste showed that first-name popularity often follows endogenous cyc
- Baby naming in : Calendar pick
- Brand naming in : Local, visual
- Celebrity influence in : Royal and screen names can move E&W lists in dated releases — still not a world
- Character names in 2000s: Luck-app market
- Gender and names in : Saints and grammar
- Given names in : Ranked fashion
- Identity and names in : Who the employer hears
- Meaning and etymology in : Meaning as root
- Name changes in : Judge or registrar
- Name laws in : Napoleonic civil status
- Name trends in : Oliver and Olivia appear among frequent England-and-Wales leaders in several 201
- Naming ceremonies in 2010s: Used-name acknowledgements
- Nicknames in : Earned tags
- Place names in : A policy finding: local names should usually lead, with careful exonym use.
- Sound and phonetics in : Ending waves
- Surnames in : Whose name after marriage
- Unique vs classic in : 2010s England and Wales releases often featured Oliver and Olivia near the top —
- Usernames in : Forum as playground
- What makes a good name in : Form fit
- Why names matter in 2004: U.S. data showed a late-20th-century rise in racially distinctive given names, w
- Baby naming in : Catalogue pick
- Brand naming in : Word as property
- Celebrity influence in : Royal and saint copy · 243
- Character names in : Shared character world
- Gender and names in : Two lists
- Given names in : Stacked given names
- Identity and names in : Who the profile says you are
- Meaning and etymology in : Meaning as entry
- Name changes in : Change the room, not always the statute
- Name laws in : Committees and kanji inventories
- Name trends in 1538: Parish counts · 251
- Naming ceremonies in : Name as sacrament-adjacent
- Nicknames in : Public handles
- Place names in : Named points on routes · 254
- Sound and phonetics in : Sonic branding
- Surnames in : Occupation to empty label
- Unique vs classic in : Small pools · 257
- Usernames in : Handle as mark
- What makes a good name in : Brand fit
- Why names matter in 3000: Named persons in records · 260
- Baby naming in : Audience pick
- Brand naming in : Name as deliverable
- Celebrity influence in : Film-star given names · 263
- Character names in : Poem as algorithm
- Gender and names in : Overlap as style
- Given names in : From few repeated names to a long tail
- Identity and names in : Patronymic to frozen surname
- Meaning and etymology in : Meaning as content
- Name changes in : From usage to paperwork
- Name laws in : Name law as equality law
- Name trends in 1880: SSA series begins · 271
- Naming ceremonies in : Two books
- Nicknames in : IT-assigned shorts
- Place names in 1086: Domesday toponyms · 274
- Sound and phonetics in : From etymology to experiment
- Surnames in : Patronymic to frozen (or not)
- Unique vs classic in 1880: Mary’s SSA band · 277
- Usernames in : Ornament as necessity
- What makes a good name in : From saint to statistic
- Why names matter in 1086: Domesday identifiers · 280
- Baby naming in : From few repeated names to a long tail
- Brand naming in : Name as handle
- Celebrity influence in 1984: Splash / Madison · 283
- Character names in : Koseki and family files
- Gender and names in : Name ≠ marker
- Given names in 1880: From hanja-default to hangul options
- Identity and names in : Married-name default
- Meaning and etymology in : From sentence-names to opaque labels
- Name changes in : From marriage-automatic to optional
- Name laws in : From usage to petition
- Name trends in 1935: Social Security Act era · 291
- Naming ceremonies in : Wristband first
- Nicknames in : Editable fronts
- Place names in : Ordnance and imperial surveys · 294
- Sound and phonetics in : From elite euphony to mass fashion
- Surnames in : One box vs two lineages
- Unique vs classic in 1960s: Longer tails · 297
- Usernames in : From local-part to @public
- What makes a good name in : From family veto to parent pair
- Why names matter in 1538: English parish registers · 300
- Baby naming in : From secret until baptism to instant post
- Brand naming in : From descriptive to arbitrary
- Celebrity influence in 1990s: SSA web charts · 303
- Character names in : Luck overlay
- Gender and names in : From error to style
- Given names in : From one official forename to used-name fields
- Identity and names in : Legal vs. lived name
- Meaning and etymology in : From scholar to scraper
- Name changes in : From medical gate to self-declaration
- Name laws in : From one married surname as obvious to contested
- Name trends in 1990s: SSA popular website · 311
- Naming ceremonies in : Comments as witnesses
- Nicknames in : From insult to badge
- Place names in 1890s: U.S. Board on Geographic Names · 314
- Sound and phonetics in : From mouth to text-to-speech
- Surnames in 2000: His taste model is mainly for given names; last names lack the same annual volat
- Unique vs classic in 1970s: Creative spelling · 317
- Usernames in : From editable to frozen login
- What makes a good name in : From one script to two lives
- Why names matter in 1804: Napoleonic civil status · 320
- Baby naming in : From meaning-as-story to meaning-as-product
- Brand naming in : From one language to a matrix
- Celebrity influence in 2000: Lieberson’s caution · 323
- Character names in : From hanja-default to hangul-optional
- Gender and names in : From grammar to rights
- Given names in 2000: Endings, imitation and avoidance of last year’s peak explain much movement in gi
- Identity and names in 1979: Social identity theory: people derive esteem from group categories — names can f
- Meaning and etymology in : From virtue hope to luck algorithm
- Name changes in 2004: Education and cohort predict keeping a birth surname — identity as labour-market
- Name laws in : From sex-marking as grammar to sex-marking as rights
- Name trends in 1994: ONS modern releases · 331
- Naming ceremonies in : From church-as-file to church-as-theatre
- Nicknames in : From stable pet form to weekly rebrand
- Place names in 1945: Names on the Land · 334
- Sound and phonetics in 1929: English speakers associated certain vowels with large or small referents in nonc
- Surnames in 2004: U.S. evidence linked women’s surname choices to cohort, education and profession
- Unique vs classic in 2000: A Matter of Taste · 337
- Usernames in : From play to asset
- What makes a good name in 2000: Popularity cycles have structure (endings, imitation of nearby names). Being “in
- Why names matter in 1880: SSA name files begin · 340
- Baby naming in 2000: They avoid last year’s exact peak and copy its neighbours — taste, not virtue.
- Brand naming in : From TM office to app store
- Celebrity influence in 2010s: Thrones-era coinages · 343
- Character names in : From open brush to closed list
- Gender and names in : From two columns to more fields
- Given names in 2003: Emily/Greg vs Lakisha/Jamal changed U.S. callbacks on matched résumés.
- Identity and names in 2000: Choosing a fashionable or antique name is a class and cohort signal, not a priva
- Meaning and etymology in 1990: Show how much uncertainty honest etymology admits — “perhaps,” “from.”
- Name changes in 2003: Callback gaps explain the temptation to “whiten” a résumé name; they do not just
- Name laws in : From Icelandic lists to U.S. state patchworks — “naming law” is a family of regi
- Name trends in 2000: A Matter of Taste · 351
- Naming ceremonies in : From local guests to global comments
- Nicknames in : From unofficial to HR field
- Place names in 1967: UNGEGN · 354
- Sound and phonetics in 2001: Strong cross-linguistic matching of nonce words to shapes — a demonstration, not
- Surnames in 2010s: Spain adjusted default order rules; research tracked how lineages appear in offi
- Unique vs classic in 2004: Fryer & Levitt · 357
- Usernames in : A username is a managed impression — identity-and-names in software.
- What makes a good name in 2003: Callback gaps show that “professional” is often a stereotype attached to a name,
- Why names matter in 1936: ONS-style counting · 360
- Baby naming in 2003: A fact to know; not a commandment to assimilate.
- Brand naming in : Generic and descriptive marks fail or weaken; arbitrary and fanciful marks are s
- Celebrity influence in 2010s: K-drama / K-pop export · 363
- Gender and names in : Some names move their share from one published sex list to the other across deca
- Given names in 2004: U.S. data showed a late-century rise in racially distinctive forenames.
- Identity and names in 2003: Employers assigned racialised identity from names and changed callbacks.
- Meaning and etymology in 2000: Parents sometimes mention meanings, but phonetic neighbourhoods and distinction
- Name changes in 2017: Historical U.S. evidence of labour-market returns to some name changes.
- Name laws in : A name that cannot decline can fail — phonology meets statute.
- Name trends in 2000s: KOSTAT name tables · 370
- Nicknames in : Ethnographies show nicknames doing social sorting inside groups.
- Place names in 1990s: Post-colonial restorations · 372
- Sound and phonetics in 2000: Name fashion moves through sound-alike clusters more than through isolated hits.
- Surnames in : English hereditary drift · 374
- Unique vs classic in 2010s: ONS Oliver/Olivia band · 375
- Usernames in 2012: A small effect that still matters when you add three underscores.
- What makes a good name in 2012: Easier-to-pronounce names were judged more positively in lab settings — fluency,
- Why names matter in 2000: Lieberson’s taste model · 378
- Baby naming in : Mary’s multi-decade lead for girls (1880–1961 in many years) is a documented ban
- Brand naming in 2012: A small psychological input — not a substitute for clearance.
- Celebrity influence in 2020s: Influencer babies · 381
- Gender and names in 2000: Endings become typed as “girlish” or “boyish” inside a taste system, then parent
- Given names in 313: Christian saint pools · 383
- Identity and names in 1637: Descartes’ “I” · 384
- Meaning and etymology in : Philip and similar “horse-lover” names share a reconstructible past — history, n
- Name changes in : Enlightenment self-naming · 386
- Name laws in : A name that would harm the child can be refused.
- Name trends in 2010s: Scrapers and apps · 388
- Nicknames in 2000: Some legal given names are already hypocoristics; they still cycle in SSA-style
- Place names in 2010s: Data-layer wars · 390
- Sound and phonetics in 400: Cratylus debate · 391
- Surnames in 1492: Iberian two-surname customs · 392
- Unique vs classic in 2010s: Handle uniqueness · 393
- Usernames in : Trademark and impersonation rules function as naming law.
- What makes a good name in : Saint-name economies · 395
- Why names matter in 2003: Emily and Lakisha · 396
- Baby naming in : Godparents and saints · 397
- Celebrity influence in : Copy the monarch · 398
- Gender and names in 2011: Everyday interaction uses first names as gender displays.
- Given names in 794: Generation characters · 400
- Baby naming in : East Asian lineages · 401
- Baby naming in 1538: Parish then civil birth · 402
- Baby naming in 1880: SSA historical series · 403
- Baby naming in : Hanja and hangul options · 404
- Baby naming in 1970s: Name-your-baby industry · 405
- Baby naming in 2000: A Matter of Taste · 406
- Baby naming in 2010s: Group-chat reveals · 407
- Baby naming in : Elders pick · 408
- Baby naming in : Calendar pick · 409
- Baby naming in : Catalogue pick · 410
- Baby naming in : Audience pick · 411
- Baby naming in : From few repeated names to a long tail · 412
- Brand naming in : Useful for shortlists, not for destinies.
- Brand naming in : Shop signs and hallmarks · 414
- Brand naming in : Modern trademark statutes · 415
- Brand naming in : Coinages (Kodak, Sony) · 416
- Brand naming in 1960s: Naming consultancies · 417
- Brand naming in 1990s: Domain names · 418
- Brand naming in 2000s: Global class filings · 419
- Brand naming in 2010s: Handle collision · 420
- Brand naming in 2010s: Linguistic disaster headlines · 421
- Brand naming in : Local, visual · 422
- Brand naming in : Word as property · 423
- Brand naming in : Name as deliverable · 424
- Brand naming in : Name as handle · 425
- Celebrity influence in : Copy the star · 426
- Celebrity influence in : Copy the character · 427
- Celebrity influence in : Copy the feed · 428
- Celebrity influence in : From person to character · 429
- Character names in : From kin-only to diaspora romanisation
- Character names in : A shared character locates a person in a descent cohort — genealogy, not fate.
- Character names in : Sibling-set syllables are a design pattern; KOSTAT still shows fashion moving ar
- Character names in : What can be filed is an empirical legal fact.
- Character names in : Theophoric and virtue names · 434
- Character names in : Generation poems · 435
- Character names in 794: Lineage lists · 436
- Character names in 1870s: Meiji surnames + registers · 437
- Character names in 1948: Korean hangul-only options · 438
- Character names in 1951: Japanese tōyō/jōyō reforms · 439
- Character names in 1981s: Jinmeiyō kanji list · 440
- Character names in 2000s: Luck-app market · 441
- Character names in : Shared character world · 442
- Character names in : Poem as algorithm · 443
- Gender and names in : Saints as sexed pools · 444
- Gender and names in : Civil sex + name · 445
- Gender and names in : Split U.S. lists · 446
- Gender and names in : Ashley/Leslie-type drifts · 447
- Gender and names in 1990s: Explicit unisex fashion · 448
- Gender and names in 2000s: Legal challenges · 449
- Gender and names in 2010s: Lived-name + pronoun fields · 450
- Gender and names in 2010s: Non-binary registration experiments · 451
- Gender and names in : Saints and grammar · 452
- Gender and names in : Two lists · 453
- Gender and names in : Overlap as style · 454
- Gender and names in : Name ≠ marker · 455
- Gender and names in : From error to style · 456
- Given names in 1538: Parish forenames · 457
- Given names in 1880: SSA series starts · 458
- Given names in 1907: ONS-style releases · 459
- Given names in 1948: Korean naming after liberation · 460
- Given names in 2000: Lieberson on forename taste · 461
- Given names in 2003: Forenames as résumé signals · 462
- Given names in : Shared saint pools · 463
- Given names in : Designed cohorts · 464
- Given names in : Ranked fashion · 465
- Given names in : Stacked given names · 466
- Given names in : From few repeated names to a long tail · 467
- Identity and names in 1792: French revolutionary renaming · 468
- Identity and names in 1920s: U.S. immigrant court names · 469
- Identity and names in 1954: Brown-era school rolls · 470
- Identity and names in 1970s: Women’s surname debates · 471
- Identity and names in 1990s: Internet handles · 472
- Identity and names in 2003: Résumé names as race cues · 473
- Identity and names in 2010s: Lived-name fields · 474
- Identity and names in : Who your people are · 475
- Identity and names in : Who the state says you are · 476
- Identity and names in : Who the employer hears · 477
- Identity and names in : Who the profile says you are · 478
- Meaning and etymology in : Theophoric names · 479
- Meaning and etymology in 100: Onomastica and midrash · 480
- Meaning and etymology in 1810s: Comparative method · 481
- Meaning and etymology in 1870s: Japanese and Korean modern dictionaries · 482
- Meaning and etymology in : Place-name surveys · 483
- Meaning and etymology in 1990: Hanks & Hodges · 484
- Meaning and etymology in 2000s: Scraped meaning sites · 485
- Meaning and etymology in 2010s: DNA-kit stories · 486
- Meaning and etymology in : Meaning as theology · 487
- Meaning and etymology in : Meaning as root · 488
- Meaning and etymology in : Meaning as entry · 489
- Meaning and etymology in : Meaning as content · 490
- Name changes in : Common-law usage · 491
- Name changes in 1875: Meiji registers · 492
- Name changes in 1918: Wartime and regime renamings · 493
- Name changes in 1970s: Feminist keep-or-change · 494
- Name changes in 1990s: Gender-recognition statutes · 495
- Name changes in 2017: Americanisation paper · 496
- Name changes in 2010s: Used-name fields · 497
- Name changes in : Renaming as domination · 498
- Name changes in : Use it and it is yours · 499
- Name changes in : Judge or registrar · 500
- Name changes in : Change the room, not always the statute · 501
- Name laws in 1538: English parish mandate · 502
- Name laws in 1804: French civil code influence · 503
- Name laws in 1875: Japanese registers · 504
- Name laws in 1890s: U.S. state change statutes · 505
- Name laws in 1991: Icelandic committee statute · 506
- Name laws in 1981s: Jinmeiyō list · 507
- Name laws in 2000s: Spanish surname-order reforms · 508
- Name laws in 2010s: Equality challenges · 509
- Name laws in : Church as registrar · 510
- Name laws in : Napoleonic civil status · 511
- Name laws in : Committees and kanji inventories · 512
- Name laws in : Name law as equality law · 513
- Name trends in : Names as counts of persons · 514
- Name trends in : Names as social data · 515
- Name trends in : Names as sport · 516
- Name trends in : Names as feed · 517
- Naming ceremonies in : From once-only to re-naming rites
- Naming ceremonies in : Rites introduce a person to kin and spirits as the community understands them —
- Naming ceremonies in : The ceremony can lag weeks or months; the legal modern file is usually closer to
- Naming ceremonies in 2000: SSA/ONS waves move whether or not a cohort was christened.
- Naming ceremonies in : Baptismal names · 522
- Naming ceremonies in : Font + parish book · 523
- Naming ceremonies in 1538: English parish registers · 524
- Naming ceremonies in : Civil registration · 525
- Naming ceremonies in : Hospital births · 526
- Naming ceremonies in : Humanist namings · 527
- Naming ceremonies in 2000s: Livestream reveals · 528
- Naming ceremonies in 2010s: Used-name acknowledgements · 529
- Naming ceremonies in : Name as sacrament-adjacent · 530
- Naming ceremonies in : Two books · 531
- Nicknames in 2003: A “friendly” résumé name can still be read as a group cue. Nicknames do not esca
- Nicknames in : Bynames as proto-surnames · 533
- Nicknames in : Hypocoristic dictionaries · 534
- Nicknames in : Press nicknames · 535
- Nicknames in 1950s: Teen slang waves · 536
- Nicknames in 1990s: Email local-parts · 537
- Nicknames in 2004: Social display names · 538
- Nicknames in 2010s: Chosen-name badges · 539
- Nicknames in 2020s: Moderation fights · 540
- Nicknames in : Earned tags · 541
- Nicknames in : Public handles · 542
- Nicknames in : IT-assigned shorts · 543
- Nicknames in : Editable fronts · 544
- Place names in : Landmark talk · 545
- Place names in : Frozen spellings · 546
- Place names in : Imported commemorations · 547
- Place names in : Dual names and reversions · 548
- Sound and phonetics in 1836: Humboldt on sound · 549
- Sound and phonetics in 1929: Sapir’s phonetic symbolism · 550
- Sound and phonetics in 1929: Köhler’s maluma/takete · 551
- Sound and phonetics in 2001: Ramachandran & Hubbard · 552
- Sound and phonetics in 2000: Lieberson on endings · 553
- Sound and phonetics in 2012: Laham et al. fluency · 554
- Sound and phonetics in 2010s: Brand sound labs · 555
- Sound and phonetics in : Nature vs convention · 556
- Sound and phonetics in : Nonce words · 557
- Sound and phonetics in : Ending waves · 558
- Sound and phonetics in : Sonic branding · 559
- Surnames in 1875: Japanese surname edicts · 560
- Surnames in 1898: U.S. immigration clerks · 561
- Surnames in 1930s: Colonial surname projects · 562
- Surnames in 1970s: Women’s surname politics · 563
- Surnames in 2000s: Airline and visa forms · 564
- Surnames in 2010s: Dual-surname experiments · 565
- Surnames in : Situational tags · 566
- Surnames in : Frozen tags · 567
- Surnames in : Exported forms · 568
- Surnames in : Whose name after marriage · 569
- Unique vs classic in : Classic by default · 570
- Unique vs classic in : Classic vs modern · 571
- Unique vs classic in : Unique as mass goal · 572
- Unique vs classic in : Unique as username · 573
- Usernames in 1970s: Login names · 574
- Usernames in 1990s: Email local-parts · 575
- Usernames in 1999: Handle culture (forums, AIM, early social) · 576
- Usernames in 2004: Platform real-name fights · 577
- Usernames in 2006: Twitter-style @names · 578
- Usernames in 2010s: Namespace exhaustion · 579
- Usernames in 2010s: Trademark + impersonation rules · 580
- Usernames in 2020s: Portable display names, frozen logins · 581
- Usernames in : IT as namer · 582
- Usernames in : Forum as playground · 583
- Usernames in : Handle as mark · 584
- Usernames in : Ornament as necessity · 585
- What makes a good name in 794: Chinese generation poems · 586
- What makes a good name in 1870s: Meiji family-name order · 587
- What makes a good name in 1910s: U.S. Americanisation drives · 588
- What makes a good name in 1970s: Creative spelling boom · 589
- What makes a good name in 1991: Icelandic committee statute · 590
- What makes a good name in 2000: A Matter of Taste · 591
- What makes a good name in 2010s: Handle collision · 592
- What makes a good name in : Calendar fit · 593
- What makes a good name in : Generation fit · 594
- What makes a good name in : Form fit · 595
- What makes a good name in : Brand fit · 596
- Why names matter in : Call-names · 597
- Why names matter in : Written identity · 598
- Why names matter in : File names · 599
- Why names matter in : Searchable selves · 600
- Baby naming in 1538: Parish then civil birth — Section 601: Parish then civil birth
- Brand naming in 19: Modern trademark statutes
- Celebrity influence in 2000: Royal and saint copy
- Character names in 794: Lineage lists — Section 604: Lineage lists
- Gender and names in 19: Civil sex + name
- Given names in 313: Christian saint pools — Section 606: Christian saint pools
- Identity and names in 1637: Descartes’ I
- Meaning and etymology in 100: Onomastica and midrash — Section 608: Onomastica and midrash
- Name changes in 18: Enlightenment self-naming
- Name laws in 1538: English parish mandate — Section 610: English parish mandate
- Name trends in 1538: Parish counts — Section 611: Parish counts
- Naming ceremonies in 1538: English parish registers — Section 612: English parish registers
- Place names in 1945: Named points on routes
- Sound and phonetics in 400: Cratylus debate — Section 614: Cratylus debate
- Surnames in 11: English hereditary drift
- Unique vs classic in 2000: Small pools
- Usernames in 1970s: Login names — Section 617: Login names
- What makes a good name in 4: Saint-name economies
- Why names matter in 3000: Named persons in records — Section 619: Named persons in records
- Baby naming in 1538: Parish then civil birth — Section 620: Parish then civil birth
- Brand naming in 19: Modern trademark statutes — Section 621: Modern trademark statutes
- Celebrity influence in 2000: Royal and saint copy — Section 622: Royal and saint copy
- Character names in 794: Lineage lists — Section 623: Lineage lists
- Gender and names in 19: Civil sex + name — Section 624: Civil sex + name
- Given names in 313: Christian saint pools — Section 625: Christian saint pools
- Identity and names in 1637: Descartes’ I — Section 626: Descartes’ I
- Meaning and etymology in 100: Onomastica and midrash — Section 627: Onomastica and midrash
- Name changes in 18: Enlightenment self-naming — Section 628: Enlightenment self-naming
- Name laws in 1538: English parish mandate — Section 629: English parish mandate
- Baby naming in 1880: SSA historical series — Section 630: SSA historical series
- Brand naming in 20: Coinages (Kodak, Sony)
- Celebrity influence in 20: Film-star given names
- Character names in 1870s: Meiji surnames + registers — Section 633: Meiji surnames + registers
- Gender and names in 20: Split U.S. lists
- Given names in 794: Generation characters — Section 635: Generation characters
- Identity and names in 1792: French revolutionary renaming — Section 636: French revolutionary renamin
- Meaning and etymology in 1810s: Comparative method — Section 637: Comparative method
- Name changes in 19: Common-law usage
- Name laws in 1804: French civil code influence — Section 639: French civil code influence
- Name trends in 1880: SSA series begins — Section 640: SSA series begins
- Naming ceremonies in 19: Civil registration
- Place names in 1086: Domesday toponyms — Section 642: Domesday toponyms
- Sound and phonetics in 1836: Humboldt on sound — Section 643: Humboldt on sound
- Surnames in 1492: Iberian two-surname customs — Section 644: Iberian two-surname customs
- Unique vs classic in 1880: Mary’s SSA band — Section 645: Mary’s SSA band
- Usernames in 1990s: Email local-parts — Section 646: Email local-parts
- What makes a good name in 794: Chinese generation poems — Section 647: Chinese generation poems
- Why names matter in 1086: Domesday identifiers — Section 648: Domesday identifiers
- Baby naming in 1880: SSA historical series — Section 649: SSA historical series
- Brand naming in 20: Coinages (Kodak, Sony) — Section 650: Coinages (Kodak, Sony)
- Celebrity influence in 20: Film-star given names — Section 651: Film-star given names
- Character names in 1870s: Meiji surnames + registers — Section 652: Meiji surnames + registers
- Gender and names in 20: Split U.S. lists — Section 653: Split U.S. lists
- Given names in 794: Generation characters — Section 654: Generation characters
- Identity and names in 1792: French revolutionary renaming — Section 655: French revolutionary renamin
- Meaning and etymology in 1810s: Comparative method — Section 656: Comparative method
- Name changes in 19: Common-law usage — Section 657: Common-law usage
- Name laws in 1804: French civil code influence — Section 658: French civil code influence
- Baby naming in 20: Hanja and hangul options
- Brand naming in 1960s: Naming consultancies — Section 660: Naming consultancies
- Celebrity influence in 1990s: SSA web charts — Section 661: SSA web charts
- Character names in 1948: Korean hangul-only options — Section 662: Korean hangul-only options
- Gender and names in 1990s: Explicit unisex fashion — Section 663: Explicit unisex fashion
- Given names in 1538: Parish forenames — Section 664: Parish forenames
- Identity and names in 1920s: U.S. immigrant court names — Section 665: U.S. immigrant court names
- Meaning and etymology in 1870s: Japanese and Korean modern dictionaries — Section 666: Japanese and Korean modern d
- Name changes in 1875: Meiji registers — Section 667: Meiji registers
- Name laws in 1875: Japanese registers — Section 668: Japanese registers
- Name trends in 1935: Social Security Act era — Section 669: Social Security Act era
- Naming ceremonies in 20: Hospital births
- Place names in 19: Ordnance and imperial surveys
- Sound and phonetics in 1929: Sapir’s phonetic symbolism — Section 672: Sapir’s phonetic symbolism
- Surnames in 1875: Japanese surname edicts — Section 673: Japanese surname edicts
- Unique vs classic in 1960s: Longer tails — Section 674: Longer tails
- Usernames in 1999: Handle culture (forums, AIM, early social) — Section 675: Handle culture (forums, AIM,
- What makes a good name in 1870s: Meiji family-name order — Section 676: Meiji family-name order
- Why names matter in 1538: English parish registers — Section 677: English parish registers
- Baby naming in 20: Hanja and hangul options — Section 678: Hanja and hangul options
- Brand naming in 1960s: Naming consultancies — Section 679: Naming consultancies
- Celebrity influence in 1990s: SSA web charts — Section 680: SSA web charts
- Character names in 1948: Korean hangul-only options — Section 681: Korean hangul-only options
- Gender and names in 1990s: Explicit unisex fashion — Section 682: Explicit unisex fashion
- Given names in 1538: Parish forenames — Section 683: Parish forenames
- Identity and names in 1920s: U.S. immigrant court names — Section 684: U.S. immigrant court names
- Meaning and etymology in 1870s: Japanese and Korean modern dictionaries — Section 685: Japanese and Korean modern d
- Name changes in 1875: Meiji registers — Section 686: Meiji registers
- Name laws in 1875: Japanese registers — Section 687: Japanese registers
- Baby naming in 1970s: Name-your-baby industry — Section 688: Name-your-baby industry
- Brand naming in 1990s: Domain names — Section 689: Domain names
- Celebrity influence in 2000: Lieberson’s caution — Section 690: Lieberson’s caution
- Character names in 1951: Japanese tōyō
- Gender and names in 2000s: Legal challenges — Section 692: Legal challenges
- Given names in 1880: SSA series starts — Section 693: SSA series starts
- Identity and names in 1954: Brown-era school rolls — Section 694: Brown-era school rolls
- Meaning and etymology in 20: Place-name surveys
- Name changes in 1918: Wartime and regime renamings — Section 696: Wartime and regime renamings
- Name laws in 1890s: U.S. state change statutes — Section 697: U.S. state change statutes
- Name trends in 1990s: SSA popular website — Section 698: SSA popular website
- Naming ceremonies in 20: Humanist namings
- Place names in 1890s: U.S. Board on Geographic Names — Section 700: U.S. Board on Geographic Nam
- Sound and phonetics in 1929: Köhler’s maluma
- Surnames in 1898: U.S. immigration clerks — Section 702: U.S. immigration clerks
- Unique vs classic in 1970s: Creative spelling — Section 703: Creative spelling
- Usernames in 2004: Platform real-name fights — Section 704: Platform real-name fights
- What makes a good name in 1910s: U.S. Americanisation drives — Section 705: U.S. Americanisation drives
- Why names matter in 1804: Napoleonic civil status — Section 706: Napoleonic civil status
- Baby naming in 1970s: Name-your-baby industry — Section 707: Name-your-baby industry
- Brand naming in 1990s: Domain names — Section 708: Domain names
- Celebrity influence in 2000: Lieberson’s caution — Section 709: Lieberson’s caution
- Character names in 1951: Japanese tōyō — Section 710: Japanese tōyō
- Gender and names in 2000s: Legal challenges — Section 711: Legal challenges
- Given names in 1880: SSA series starts — Section 712: SSA series starts
- Identity and names in 1954: Brown-era school rolls — Section 713: Brown-era school rolls
- Meaning and etymology in 20: Place-name surveys — Section 714: Place-name surveys
- Name changes in 1918: Wartime and regime renamings — Section 715: Wartime and regime renamings
- Name laws in 1890s: U.S. state change statutes — Section 716: U.S. state change statutes
- Baby naming in 2000: A Matter of Taste — Section 717: A Matter of Taste
- Brand naming in 2000s: Global class filings — Section 718: Global class filings
- Celebrity influence in 2010s: Thrones-era coinages — Section 719: Thrones-era coinages
- Character names in 1981s: Jinmeiyō kanji list — Section 720: Jinmeiyō kanji list
- Gender and names in 2010s: Lived-name + pronoun fields — Section 721: Lived-name + pronoun fields
- Given names in 1907: ONS-style releases — Section 722: ONS-style releases
- Identity and names in 1970s: Women’s surname debates — Section 723: Women’s surname debates
- Meaning and etymology in 2000s: Scraped meaning sites — Section 724: Scraped meaning sites
- Name changes in 1970s: Feminist keep-or-change — Section 725: Feminist keep-or-change
- Name laws in 1991: Icelandic committee statute — Section 726: Icelandic committee statute
- Name trends in 1994: ONS modern releases — Section 727: ONS modern releases
- Naming ceremonies in 2000s: Livestream reveals — Section 728: Livestream reveals
- Place names in 1945: Names on the Land — Section 729: Names on the Land
- Sound and phonetics in 2000: Lieberson on endings — Section 730: Lieberson on endings
- Surnames in 1930s: Colonial surname projects — Section 731: Colonial surname projects
- Unique vs classic in 2000: A Matter of Taste — Section 732: A Matter of Taste
- Usernames in 2006: Twitter-style @names — Section 733: Twitter-style @names
- What makes a good name in 1970s: Creative spelling boom — Section 734: Creative spelling boom
- Why names matter in 1880: SSA name files begin — Section 735: SSA name files begin
- Baby naming in 2000: A Matter of Taste — Section 736: A Matter of Taste
- Brand naming in 2000s: Global class filings — Section 737: Global class filings
- Celebrity influence in 2010s: Thrones-era coinages — Section 738: Thrones-era coinages
- Character names in 1981s: Jinmeiyō kanji list — Section 739: Jinmeiyō kanji list
- Gender and names in 2010s: Lived-name + pronoun fields — Section 740: Lived-name + pronoun fields
- Given names in 1907: ONS-style releases — Section 741: ONS-style releases
- Identity and names in 1970s: Women’s surname debates — Section 742: Women’s surname debates
- Meaning and etymology in 2000s: Scraped meaning sites — Section 743: Scraped meaning sites
- Name changes in 1970s: Feminist keep-or-change — Section 744: Feminist keep-or-change
- Name laws in 1991: Icelandic committee statute — Section 745: Icelandic committee statute
- Baby naming in 2010s: Group-chat reveals — Section 746: Group-chat reveals
- Brand naming in 2010s: Handle collision — Section 747: Handle collision
- Celebrity influence in 2010s: K-drama
- Character names in 2000s: Luck-app market — Section 749: Luck-app market
- Gender and names in 2010s: Non-binary registration experiments — Section 750: Non-binary registration expe
- Given names in 1948: Korean naming after liberation — Section 751: Korean naming after liberati
- Identity and names in 1990s: Internet handles — Section 752: Internet handles
- Meaning and etymology in 2010s: DNA-kit stories — Section 753: DNA-kit stories
- Name changes in 1990s: Gender-recognition statutes — Section 754: Gender-recognition statutes
- Name laws in 1981s: Jinmeiyō list — Section 755: Jinmeiyō list
- Name trends in 2000: A Matter of Taste — Section 756: A Matter of Taste
- Naming ceremonies in 2010s: Used-name acknowledgements — Section 757: Used-name acknowledgements
- Place names in 1990s: Post-colonial restorations — Section 758: Post-colonial restorations
- Sound and phonetics in 2012: Laham et al. fluency — Section 759: Laham et al. fluency
- Surnames in 1970s: Women’s surname politics — Section 760: Women’s surname politics
- Unique vs classic in 2010s: ONS Oliver
- Usernames in 2010s: Namespace exhaustion — Section 762: Namespace exhaustion
- What makes a good name in 1991: Icelandic committee statute — Section 763: Icelandic committee statute
- Why names matter in 1936: ONS-style counting — Section 764: ONS-style counting
- Baby naming in 2010s: Group-chat reveals — Section 765: Group-chat reveals
- Brand naming in 2010s: Handle collision — Section 766: Handle collision
- Celebrity influence in 2010s: K-drama — Section 767: K-drama
- Character names in 2000s: Luck-app market — Section 768: Luck-app market
- Gender and names in 2010s: Non-binary registration experiments — Section 769: Non-binary registration expe
- Given names in 1948: Korean naming after liberation — Section 770: Korean naming after liberati
- Identity and names in 1990s: Internet handles — Section 771: Internet handles
- Meaning and etymology in 2010s: DNA-kit stories — Section 772: DNA-kit stories
- Name changes in 1990s: Gender-recognition statutes — Section 773: Gender-recognition statutes
- Name laws in 1981s: Jinmeiyō list — Section 774: Jinmeiyō list
- Baby naming in 2000: They avoid last year’s exact peak and copy
- Brand naming in 2010s: Linguistic disaster headlines — Section 776: Linguistic disaster headline
- Celebrity influence in 2020s: Influencer babies — Section 777: Influencer babies
- Given names in 2000: Lieberson on forename taste — Section 778: Lieberson on forename taste
- Identity and names in 2003: Résumé names as race cues — Section 779: Résumé names as race cues
- Meaning and etymology in 1990: Show how much uncertainty honest etymology
- Name changes in 2017: Americanisation paper — Section 781: Americanisation paper
- Name laws in 2000s: Spanish surname-order reforms — Section 782: Spanish surname-order reform
- Name trends in 2000s: KOSTAT name tables — Section 783: KOSTAT name tables
- Place names in 2010s: Data-layer wars — Section 784: Data-layer wars
- Sound and phonetics in 2010s: Brand sound labs — Section 785: Brand sound labs
- Surnames in 2000s: Airline and visa forms — Section 786: Airline and visa forms
- Unique vs classic in 2010s: Handle uniqueness — Section 787: Handle uniqueness
- Usernames in 2010s: Trademark + impersonation rules — Section 788: Trademark + impersonation ru
- What makes a good name in 2000: A Matter of Taste — Section 789: A Matter of Taste
- Why names matter in 2000: Lieberson’s taste model — Section 790: Lieberson’s taste model
- Baby naming in 2000: They avoid last year’s exact peak and copy — Section 791: They avoid last year’s exact
- Brand naming in 2010s: Linguistic disaster headlines — Section 792: Linguistic disaster headline
- Celebrity influence in 2020s: Influencer babies — Section 793: Influencer babies
- Given names in 2000: Lieberson on forename taste — Section 794: Lieberson on forename taste
- Identity and names in 2003: Résumé names as race cues — Section 795: Résumé names as race cues
- Meaning and etymology in 1990: Show how much uncertainty honest etymology — Section 796: Show how much uncertainty ho
- Name changes in 2017: Americanisation paper — Section 797: Americanisation paper
- Name laws in 2000s: Spanish surname-order reforms — Section 798: Spanish surname-order reform
- Celebrity influence in 2000: Copy the monarch
- Given names in 2003: Forenames as résumé signals — Section 800: Forenames as résumé signals
- Baby naming in 1538: Parish then civil birth ½ Parish then civil birth
- Celebrity influence in 2000: Royal and saint copy ½ Royal and saint copy
- Character names in 794: Lineage lists ½ Lineage lists
- Given names in 313: Christian saint pools ½ Christian saint pools
- Identity and names in 1637: Descartes’ I ½ Descartes’ I
- Meaning and etymology in 100: Onomastica and midrash ½ Onomastica and midrash
- Name changes in 18: Enlightenment self-naming ½ Enlightenment self-naming
- Name trends in 1538: Parish counts ½ Parish counts
- Place names in 1945: Named points on routes ½ Named points on routes
- Sound and phonetics in 400: Cratylus debate ½ Cratylus debate
- Surnames in 11: English hereditary drift ½ English hereditary drift
- Unique vs classic in 2000: Small pools ½ Small pools
- Usernames in 1970s: Login names ½ Login names
- What makes a good name in 4: Saint-name economies ½ Saint-name economies
- Why names matter in 3000: Named persons in records ½ Named persons in records
- Baby naming in 1880: SSA historical series ½ SSA historical series
- Celebrity influence in 20: Film-star given names ½ Film-star given names
- Character names in 1870s: Meiji surnames + registers ½ Meiji surnames + registers
- Given names in 794: Generation characters ½ Generation characters
- Identity and names in 1792: French revolutionary renaming ½ French revolutionary renamin
- Meaning and etymology in 1810s: Comparative method ½ Comparative method
- Name changes in 19: Common-law usage ½ Common-law usage
- Baby naming in 20: Hanja and hangul options ½ Hanja and hangul options
- Celebrity influence in 1990s: SSA web charts ½ SSA web charts
- Character names, Meiji surnames +, 1870s
- Given names, Generation, 1880
- Identity and names, French, 1792
- Meaning and etymology, Comparative method, 1810s
- Name changes, Common-law usage, 2003
- Name laws, French civil code, 1804
- Name trends, SSA series begins, 1880
- Place names, Domesday toponyms, 1945
- Sound and phonetics, Humboldt on sound, 1836
- Surnames, Iberian, 2010
- Unique vs classic, Mary’s SSA band, 1880
- Usernames, Email local-parts, 1990s
- What makes a good name, Chinese, 2010
- Why names matter, Domesday, 2003
- Baby naming, SSA historical, 1880 3
- Celebrity influence, Film-star given, 1984 3
- Character names, Meiji surnames +, 1870s 3
- Given names, Generation, 1880 3
- Identity and names, French, 1792 3
- Meaning and etymology, Comparative method, 1810s 3
- Name changes, Common-law usage, 2003 3
- Name laws, French civil code, 1804 3
- Baby naming, Hanja and hangul, 1880
- Brand naming, Naming, 1960s
- Celebrity influence, SSA web charts, 1990s
- Character names, Korean, 1948
- Gender and names, Explicit unisex, 1990s
- Given names, Parish forenames, 1880
- Identity and names, U.S. immigrant, 1920s
- Meaning and etymology, Japanese and, 1870s
- Name changes, Meiji registers, 1875
- Name laws, Japanese registers, 1875
- Name trends, Social Security, 1935
- Place names, Ordnance and, 1945
- Sound and phonetics, Sapir’s phonetic, 1929
- Surnames, Japanese surname, 1875
- Unique vs classic, Longer tails, 1960s
- Usernames, Handle culture, 1999
- What makes a good name, Meiji family-name, 1870s
- Why names matter, English parish, 2003
- Baby naming, Hanja and hangul, 1880 3
- Brand naming, Naming, 1960s 3
- Celebrity influence, SSA web charts, 1990s 3
- Character names, Korean, 1948 3
- Gender and names, Explicit unisex, 1990s 3
- Given names, Parish forenames, 1880 3
- Identity and names, U.S. immigrant, 1920s 3
- Meaning and etymology, Japanese and, 1870s 3
- Name changes, Meiji registers, 1875 3
- Name laws, Japanese registers, 1875 3
- Baby naming, Name-your-baby, 1970s
- Brand naming, Domain names, 1990s
- Celebrity influence, Lieberson’s, 2000
- Character names, Japanese tōyō, 1951
- Gender and names, Legal challenges, 2000s
- Given names, SSA series starts, 1880
- Identity and names, Brown-era school, 1954
- Meaning and etymology, Place-name surveys, 2010
- Name changes, Wartime and, 1918
- Name laws, U.S. state change, 1890s
- Name trends, SSA popular, 1990s
- Place names, U.S. Board on, 1890s
- Sound and phonetics, Köhler’s maluma, 1929
- Surnames, U.S. immigration, 1898
- Unique vs classic, Creative spelling, 1970s
- Usernames, Platform, 2004
- What makes a good name, U.S. Americanisati, 1910s
- Why names matter, Napoleonic civil, 1804
- Baby naming, Name-your-baby, 1970s 3
- Brand naming, Domain names, 1990s 3
- Celebrity influence, Lieberson’s, 2000 3
- Character names, Japanese tōyō, 1951 4
- Gender and names, Legal challenges, 2000s 3
- Given names, SSA series starts, 1880 3
- Identity and names, Brown-era school, 1954 4
- Meaning and etymology, Place-name surveys, 2010 3
- Baby naming in 1538: Parish then civil birth — Section 901: Parish then civil birth
- Brand naming in 19: Modern trademark statutes — Section 902: Modern trademark statutes
- Celebrity influence in 2000: Royal and saint copy — Section 903: Royal and saint copy
- Character names in 794: Lineage lists — Section 904: Lineage lists
- Gender and names in 19: Civil sex + name — Section 905: Civil sex + name
- Given names in 313: Christian saint pools — Section 906: Christian saint pools
- Identity and names in 1637: Descartes’ I — Section 907: Descartes’ I
- Meaning and etymology in 100: Onomastica and midrash — Section 908: Onomastica and midrash
- Name changes in 18: Enlightenment self-naming — Section 909: Enlightenment self-naming
- Name laws in 1538: English parish mandate — Section 910: English parish mandate
- Name trends in 1538: Parish counts — Section 911: Parish counts
- Naming ceremonies in 1538: English parish registers — Section 912: English parish registers
- Place names in 1945: Named points on routes — Section 913: Named points on routes
- Sound and phonetics in 400: Cratylus debate — Section 914: Cratylus debate
- Surnames in 11: English hereditary drift — Section 915: English hereditary drift
- Unique vs classic in 2000: Small pools — Section 916: Small pools
- Usernames in 1970s: Login names — Section 917: Login names
- What makes a good name in 4: Saint-name economies — Section 918: Saint-name economies
- Why names matter in 3000: Named persons in records — Section 919: Named persons in records
- Baby naming in 1880: SSA historical series — Section 920: SSA historical series
- Brand naming in 20: Coinages (Kodak, Sony) — Section 921: Coinages (Kodak, Sony)
- Celebrity influence in 20: Film-star given names — Section 922: Film-star given names
- Character names in 1870s: Meiji surnames + registers — Section 923: Meiji surnames + registers
- Gender and names in 20: Split U.S. lists — Section 924: Split U.S. lists
- Given names in 794: Generation characters — Section 925: Generation characters
- Identity and names in 1792: French revolutionary renaming — Section 926: French revolutionary renamin
- Meaning and etymology in 1810s: Comparative method — Section 927: Comparative method
- Name changes in 19: Common-law usage — Section 928: Common-law usage
- Name laws in 1804: French civil code influence — Section 929: French civil code influence
- Name trends in 1880: SSA series begins — Section 930: SSA series begins
- Naming ceremonies in 19: Civil registration — Section 931: Civil registration
- Place names in 1086: Domesday toponyms — Section 932: Domesday toponyms
- Sound and phonetics in 1836: Humboldt on sound — Section 933: Humboldt on sound
- Surnames in 1492: Iberian two-surname customs — Section 934: Iberian two-surname customs
- Unique vs classic in 1880: Mary’s SSA band — Section 935: Mary’s SSA band
- Usernames in 1990s: Email local-parts — Section 936: Email local-parts
- What makes a good name in 794: Chinese generation poems — Section 937: Chinese generation poems
- Why names matter in 1086: Domesday identifiers — Section 938: Domesday identifiers
- Baby naming in 20: Hanja and hangul options — Section 939: Hanja and hangul options
- Brand naming in 1960s: Naming consultancies — Section 940: Naming consultancies
- Celebrity influence in 1990s: SSA web charts — Section 941: SSA web charts
- Character names in 1948: Korean hangul-only options — Section 942: Korean hangul-only options
- Gender and names in 1990s: Explicit unisex fashion — Section 943: Explicit unisex fashion
- Given names in 1538: Parish forenames — Section 944: Parish forenames
- Identity and names in 1920s: U.S. immigrant court names — Section 945: U.S. immigrant court names
- Meaning and etymology in 1870s: Japanese and Korean modern dictionaries — Section 946: Japanese and Korean modern d
- Name changes in 1875: Meiji registers — Section 947: Meiji registers
- Name laws in 1875: Japanese registers — Section 948: Japanese registers
- Name trends in 1935: Social Security Act era — Section 949: Social Security Act era
- Naming ceremonies in 20: Hospital births — Section 950: Hospital births
- Place names in 19: Ordnance and imperial surveys — Section 951: Ordnance and imperial survey
- Sound and phonetics in 1929: Sapir’s phonetic symbolism — Section 952: Sapir’s phonetic symbolism
- Surnames in 1875: Japanese surname edicts — Section 953: Japanese surname edicts
- Unique vs classic in 1960s: Longer tails — Section 954: Longer tails
- Usernames in 1999: Handle culture (forums, AIM, early social) — Section 955: Handle culture (forums, AIM,
- What makes a good name in 1870s: Meiji family-name order — Section 956: Meiji family-name order
- Why names matter in 1538: English parish registers — Section 957: English parish registers
- Baby naming in 1970s: Name-your-baby industry — Section 958: Name-your-baby industry
- Brand naming in 1990s: Domain names — Section 959: Domain names
- Celebrity influence in 2000: Lieberson’s caution — Section 960: Lieberson’s caution
- Character names in 1951: Japanese tōyō — Section 961: Japanese tōyō
- Gender and names in 2000s: Legal challenges — Section 962: Legal challenges
- Given names in 1880: SSA series starts — Section 963: SSA series starts
- Identity and names in 1954: Brown-era school rolls — Section 964: Brown-era school rolls
- Meaning and etymology in 20: Place-name surveys — Section 965: Place-name surveys
- Name changes in 1918: Wartime and regime renamings — Section 966: Wartime and regime renamings
- Name laws in 1890s: U.S. state change statutes — Section 967: U.S. state change statutes
- Name trends in 1990s: SSA popular website — Section 968: SSA popular website
- Naming ceremonies in 20: Humanist namings — Section 969: Humanist namings
- Place names in 1890s: U.S. Board on Geographic Names — Section 970: U.S. Board on Geographic Nam
- Sound and phonetics in 1929: Köhler’s maluma — Section 971: Köhler’s maluma
- Surnames in 1898: U.S. immigration clerks — Section 972: U.S. immigration clerks
- Unique vs classic in 1970s: Creative spelling — Section 973: Creative spelling
- Usernames in 2004: Platform real-name fights — Section 974: Platform real-name fights
- What makes a good name in 1910s: U.S. Americanisation drives — Section 975: U.S. Americanisation drives
- Why names matter in 1804: Napoleonic civil status — Section 976: Napoleonic civil status
- Baby naming in 2000: A Matter of Taste — Section 977: A Matter of Taste
- Brand naming in 2000s: Global class filings — Section 978: Global class filings
- Celebrity influence in 2010s: Thrones-era coinages — Section 979: Thrones-era coinages
- Character names in 1981s: Jinmeiyō kanji list — Section 980: Jinmeiyō kanji list
- Gender and names in 2010s: Lived-name + pronoun fields — Section 981: Lived-name + pronoun fields
- Given names in 1907: ONS-style releases — Section 982: ONS-style releases
- Identity and names in 1970s: Women’s surname debates — Section 983: Women’s surname debates
- Meaning and etymology in 2000s: Scraped meaning sites — Section 984: Scraped meaning sites
- Name changes in 1970s: Feminist keep-or-change — Section 985: Feminist keep-or-change
- Name laws in 1991: Icelandic committee statute — Section 986: Icelandic committee statute
- Name trends in 1994: ONS modern releases — Section 987: ONS modern releases
- Naming ceremonies in 2000s: Livestream reveals — Section 988: Livestream reveals
- Place names in 1945: Names on the Land — Section 989: Names on the Land
- Sound and phonetics in 2000: Lieberson on endings — Section 990: Lieberson on endings
- Surnames in 1930s: Colonial surname projects — Section 991: Colonial surname projects
- Unique vs classic in 2000: A Matter of Taste — Section 992: A Matter of Taste
- Usernames in 2006: Twitter-style @names — Section 993: Twitter-style @names
- What makes a good name in 1970s: Creative spelling boom — Section 994: Creative spelling boom
- Why names matter in 1880: SSA name files begin — Section 995: SSA name files begin
- Baby naming in 2010s: Group-chat reveals — Section 996: Group-chat reveals
- Brand naming in 2010s: Handle collision — Section 997: Handle collision
- Celebrity influence in 2010s: K-drama — Section 998: K-drama
- Character names in 2000s: Luck-app market — Section 999: Luck-app market
- Gender and names in 2010s: Non-binary registration experiments — Section 1000: Non-binary registration expe
- Baby naming in 1538: Parish then civil birth — Section 1001: Parish then civil birth
- Brand naming in 19: Modern trademark statutes — Section 1002: Modern trademark statutes
- Celebrity influence in 2000: Royal and saint copy — Section 1003: Royal and saint copy
- Character names in 794: Lineage lists — Section 1004: Lineage lists
- Gender and names in 19: Civil sex + name — Section 1005: Civil sex + name
- Given names in 313: Christian saint pools — Section 1006: Christian saint pools
- Identity and names in 1637: Descartes’ I — Section 1007: Descartes’ I
- Meaning and etymology in 100: Onomastica and midrash — Section 1008: Onomastica and midrash
- Name changes in 18: Enlightenment self-naming — Section 1009: Enlightenment self-naming
- Name laws in 1538: English parish mandate — Section 1010: English parish mandate
- Name trends in 1538: Parish counts — Section 1011: Parish counts
- Naming ceremonies in 1538: English parish registers — Section 1012: English parish registers
- Place names in 1945: Named points on routes — Section 1013: Named points on routes
- Sound and phonetics in 400: Cratylus debate — Section 1014: Cratylus debate
- Surnames in 11: English hereditary drift — Section 1015: English hereditary drift
- Unique vs classic in 2000: Small pools — Section 1016: Small pools
- Usernames in 1970s: Login names — Section 1017: Login names
- What makes a good name in 4: Saint-name economies — Section 1018: Saint-name economies
- Why names matter in 3000: Named persons in records — Section 1019: Named persons in records
- Baby naming in 1880: SSA historical series — Section 1020: SSA historical series
- Brand naming in 20: Coinages (Kodak, Sony) — Section 1021: Coinages (Kodak, Sony)
- Celebrity influence in 20: Film-star given names — Section 1022: Film-star given names
- Character names in 1870s: Meiji surnames + registers — Section 1023: Meiji surnames + registers
- Gender and names in 20: Split U.S. lists — Section 1024: Split U.S. lists
- Given names in 794: Generation characters — Section 1025: Generation characters
- Identity and names in 1792: French revolutionary renaming — Section 1026: French revolutionary renamin
- Meaning and etymology in 1810s: Comparative method — Section 1027: Comparative method
- Name changes in 19: Common-law usage — Section 1028: Common-law usage
- Name laws in 1804: French civil code influence — Section 1029: French civil code influence
- Name trends in 1880: SSA series begins — Section 1030: SSA series begins
- Naming ceremonies in 19: Civil registration — Section 1031: Civil registration
- Place names in 1086: Domesday toponyms — Section 1032: Domesday toponyms
- Sound and phonetics in 1836: Humboldt on sound — Section 1033: Humboldt on sound
- Surnames in 1492: Iberian two-surname customs — Section 1034: Iberian two-surname customs
- Unique vs classic in 1880: Mary’s SSA band — Section 1035: Mary’s SSA band
- Usernames in 1990s: Email local-parts — Section 1036: Email local-parts
- What makes a good name in 794: Chinese generation poems — Section 1037: Chinese generation poems
- Why names matter in 1086: Domesday identifiers — Section 1038: Domesday identifiers
- Baby naming in 20: Hanja and hangul options — Section 1039: Hanja and hangul options
- Brand naming in 1960s: Naming consultancies — Section 1040: Naming consultancies
- Celebrity influence in 1990s: SSA web charts — Section 1041: SSA web charts
- Character names in 1948: Korean hangul-only options — Section 1042: Korean hangul-only options
- Gender and names in 1990s: Explicit unisex fashion — Section 1043: Explicit unisex fashion
- Given names in 1538: Parish forenames — Section 1044: Parish forenames
- Identity and names in 1920s: U.S. immigrant court names — Section 1045: U.S. immigrant court names
- Meaning and etymology in 1870s: Japanese and Korean modern dictionaries — Section 1046: Japanese and Korean modern d
- Name changes in 1875: Meiji registers — Section 1047: Meiji registers
- Name laws in 1875: Japanese registers — Section 1048: Japanese registers
- Name trends in 1935: Social Security Act era — Section 1049: Social Security Act era
- Naming ceremonies in 20: Hospital births — Section 1050: Hospital births
- Place names in 19: Ordnance and imperial surveys — Section 1051: Ordnance and imperial survey
- Sound and phonetics in 1929: Sapir’s phonetic symbolism — Section 1052: Sapir’s phonetic symbolism
- Surnames in 1875: Japanese surname edicts — Section 1053: Japanese surname edicts
- Unique vs classic in 1960s: Longer tails — Section 1054: Longer tails
- Usernames in 1999: Handle culture (forums, AIM, early social) — Section 1055: Handle culture (forums, AIM,
- What makes a good name in 1870s: Meiji family-name order — Section 1056: Meiji family-name order
- Why names matter in 1538: English parish registers — Section 1057: English parish registers
- Baby naming in 1970s: Name-your-baby industry — Section 1058: Name-your-baby industry
- Brand naming in 1990s: Domain names — Section 1059: Domain names
- Celebrity influence in 2000: Lieberson’s caution — Section 1060: Lieberson’s caution
- Character names in 1951: Japanese tōyō — Section 1061: Japanese tōyō
- Gender and names in 2000s: Legal challenges — Section 1062: Legal challenges
- Given names in 1880: SSA series starts — Section 1063: SSA series starts
- Identity and names in 1954: Brown-era school rolls — Section 1064: Brown-era school rolls
- Meaning and etymology in 20: Place-name surveys — Section 1065: Place-name surveys
- Name changes in 1918: Wartime and regime renamings — Section 1066: Wartime and regime renamings
- Name laws in 1890s: U.S. state change statutes — Section 1067: U.S. state change statutes
- Name trends in 1990s: SSA popular website — Section 1068: SSA popular website
- Naming ceremonies in 20: Humanist namings — Section 1069: Humanist namings
- Place names in 1890s: U.S. Board on Geographic Names — Section 1070: U.S. Board on Geographic Nam
- Sound and phonetics in 1929: Köhler’s maluma — Section 1071: Köhler’s maluma
- Surnames in 1898: U.S. immigration clerks — Section 1072: U.S. immigration clerks
- Unique vs classic in 1970s: Creative spelling — Section 1073: Creative spelling
- Usernames in 2004: Platform real-name fights — Section 1074: Platform real-name fights
- What makes a good name in 1910s: U.S. Americanisation drives — Section 1075: U.S. Americanisation drives
- Why names matter in 1804: Napoleonic civil status — Section 1076: Napoleonic civil status
- Baby naming in 2000: A Matter of Taste — Section 1077: A Matter of Taste
- Brand naming in 2000s: Global class filings — Section 1078: Global class filings
- Celebrity influence in 2010s: Thrones-era coinages — Section 1079: Thrones-era coinages
- Character names in 1981s: Jinmeiyō kanji list — Section 1080: Jinmeiyō kanji list
- Gender and names in 2010s: Lived-name + pronoun fields — Section 1081: Lived-name + pronoun fields
- Given names in 1907: ONS-style releases — Section 1082: ONS-style releases
- Identity and names in 1970s: Women’s surname debates — Section 1083: Women’s surname debates
- Meaning and etymology in 2000s: Scraped meaning sites — Section 1084: Scraped meaning sites
- Name changes in 1970s: Feminist keep-or-change — Section 1085: Feminist keep-or-change
- Name laws in 1991: Icelandic committee statute — Section 1086: Icelandic committee statute
- Name trends in 1994: ONS modern releases — Section 1087: ONS modern releases
- Naming ceremonies in 2000s: Livestream reveals — Section 1088: Livestream reveals
- Place names in 1945: Names on the Land — Section 1089: Names on the Land
- Sound and phonetics in 2000: Lieberson on endings — Section 1090: Lieberson on endings
- Surnames in 1930s: Colonial surname projects — Section 1091: Colonial surname projects
- Unique vs classic in 2000: A Matter of Taste — Section 1092: A Matter of Taste
- Usernames in 2006: Twitter-style @names — Section 1093: Twitter-style @names
- What makes a good name in 1970s: Creative spelling boom — Section 1094: Creative spelling boom
- Why names matter in 1880: SSA name files begin — Section 1095: SSA name files begin
- Baby naming in 2010s: Group-chat reveals — Section 1096: Group-chat reveals
- Brand naming in 2010s: Handle collision — Section 1097: Handle collision
- Celebrity influence in 2010s: K-drama — Section 1098: K-drama
- Character names in 2000s: Luck-app market — Section 1099: Luck-app market
- Gender and names in 2010s: Non-binary registration experiments — Section 1100: Non-binary registration expe
- Baby naming in 1538: Parish then civil birth — Section 1101: Parish then civil birth
- Baby naming in 1970s: Name-your-baby industry — Section 1102: Name-your-baby industry
- Baby naming in 2000: They avoid last year’s exact peak and copy — Section 1103: They avoid last year’s exact
- Brand naming in 1960s: Naming consultancies — Section 1104: Naming consultancies
- Brand naming in 2010s: Handle collision — Section 1105: Handle collision
- Celebrity influence in 20: Film-star given names — Section 1106: Film-star given names
- Celebrity influence in 2010s: Thrones-era coinages — Section 1107: Thrones-era coinages
- Celebrity influence in 2000: Copy the monarch — Section 1108: Copy the monarch
- Celebrity influence in 2000: Copy the feed — Section 1109: Copy the feed
- Celebrity influence in 2000: From anecdote to downloadable spike — Section 1110: From anecdote to downloadabl
- Character names in 1870s: Meiji surnames + registers — Section 1111: Meiji surnames + registers
- Character names in 1981s: Jinmeiyō kanji list — Section 1112: Jinmeiyō kanji list
- Gender and names in 20: Split U.S. lists — Section 1113: Split U.S. lists
- Gender and names in 2010s: Lived-name + pronoun fields — Section 1114: Lived-name + pronoun fields
- Given names in 794: Generation characters — Section 1115: Generation characters
- Given names in 1907: ONS-style releases — Section 1116: ONS-style releases
- Given names in 2003: Forenames as résumé signals — Section 1117: Forenames as résumé signals
- Given names in 1: Ranked fashion — Section 1118: Ranked fashion
- Given names in 1: From hanja-default to hangul options — Section 1119: From hanja-default to hangul
- Identity and names in 1637: Descartes’ I — Section 1120: Descartes’ I
- Identity and names in 1954: Brown-era school rolls — Section 1121: Brown-era school rolls
- Identity and names in 2003: Résumé names as race cues — Section 1122: Résumé names as race cues
- Meaning and etymology in 100: Onomastica and midrash — Section 1123: Onomastica and midrash
- Meaning and etymology in 20: Place-name surveys — Section 1124: Place-name surveys
- Meaning and etymology in 1990: Show how much uncertainty honest etymology — Section 1125: Show how much uncertainty ho
- Name changes in 1875: Meiji registers — Section 1126: Meiji registers
- Name changes in 1990s: Gender-recognition statutes — Section 1127: Gender-recognition statutes
- Name changes in 2004: Education and cohort predict keeping a bir — Section 1128: Education and cohort predict
- Name laws in 1875: Japanese registers — Section 1129: Japanese registers
- Name laws in 1981s: Jinmeiyō list — Section 1130: Jinmeiyō list
- Name trends in 1538: Parish counts — Section 1131: Parish counts
- Name trends in 1990s: SSA popular website — Section 1132: SSA popular website
- Name trends in 2000s: KOSTAT name tables — Section 1133: KOSTAT name tables
- Name trends in 1880: Names as social data — Section 1134: Names as social data
- Name trends in 1880: From local gossip to national file — Section 1135: From local gossip to nationa
- Name trends in 2000: Endings, imitation and peak avoidance expl — Section 1136: Endings, imitation and peak
- Naming ceremonies in 20: Hospital births — Section 1137: Hospital births
- Naming ceremonies in 2010s: Used-name acknowledgements — Section 1138: Used-name acknowledgements
- Place names in 19: Ordnance and imperial surveys — Section 1139: Ordnance and imperial survey
- Place names in 1990s: Post-colonial restorations — Section 1140: Post-colonial restorations
- Place names in 1945: Frozen spellings — Section 1141: Frozen spellings
- Place names in 1945: From description to commemoration — Section 1142: From description to commemor
- Place names in 1945: Celtic, Old English, Norse and Norman piec — Section 1143: Celtic, Old English, Norse a
- Sound and phonetics in 1929: Sapir’s phonetic symbolism — Section 1144: Sapir’s phonetic symbolism
- Sound and phonetics in 2012: Laham et al. fluency — Section 1145: Laham et al. fluency
- Surnames in 11: English hereditary drift — Section 1146: English hereditary drift
- Surnames in 1898: U.S. immigration clerks — Section 1147: U.S. immigration clerks
- Surnames in 2000s: Airline and visa forms — Section 1148: Airline and visa forms
- Surnames in 2000: His taste model is mainly for given names; — Section 1149: His taste model is mainly fo
- Unique vs classic in 1960s: Longer tails — Section 1150: Longer tails
- Unique vs classic in 2010s: ONS Oliver — Section 1151: ONS Oliver
- Unique vs classic in 2000: Classic vs modern — Section 1152: Classic vs modern
- Unique vs classic in 2000: From saint-classic to grandparent-classic — Section 1153: From saint-classic to grandp
- Unique vs classic in 2000: The unique pole is usually a neighbour of — Section 1154: The unique pole is usually a
- Usernames in 1999: Handle culture (forums, AIM, early social) — Section 1155: Handle culture (forums, AIM,
- Usernames in 2010s: Namespace exhaustion — Section 1156: Namespace exhaustion
- What makes a good name in 4: Saint-name economies — Section 1157: Saint-name economies
- What makes a good name in 1910s: U.S. Americanisation drives — Section 1158: U.S. Americanisation drives
- What makes a good name in 2000: A Matter of Taste — Section 1159: A Matter of Taste
- Why names matter in 3000: Named persons in records — Section 1160: Named persons in records
- Why names matter in 1804: Napoleonic civil status — Section 1161: Napoleonic civil status
- Why names matter in 2000: Lieberson’s taste model — Section 1162: Lieberson’s taste model
- Why names matter in 2003: File names — Section 1163: File names
- Why names matter in 2003: From priest to registrar — Section 1164: From priest to registrar
- Baby naming in 1880: SSA historical series — Section 1165: SSA historical series
- Baby naming in 2000: A Matter of Taste — Section 1166: A Matter of Taste
- Brand naming in 19: Modern trademark statutes — Section 1167: Modern trademark statutes
- Brand naming in 1990s: Domain names — Section 1168: Domain names
- Brand naming in 2010s: Linguistic disaster headlines — Section 1169: Linguistic disaster headline
- Celebrity influence in 1990s: SSA web charts — Section 1170: SSA web charts
- Celebrity influence in 2010s: K-drama — Section 1171: K-drama
- Celebrity influence in 2000: Copy the star — Section 1172: Copy the star
- Celebrity influence in 2000: From person to character — Section 1173: From person to character
- Celebrity influence in 2000: Internal fashion (endings, distinction) ex — Section 1174: Internal fashion (endings, d
- Character names in 1948: Korean hangul-only options — Section 1175: Korean hangul-only options
- Character names in 2000s: Luck-app market — Section 1176: Luck-app market
- Gender and names in 1990s: Explicit unisex fashion — Section 1177: Explicit unisex fashion
- Gender and names in 2010s: Non-binary registration experiments — Section 1178: Non-binary registration expe
- Given names in 1538: Parish forenames — Section 1179: Parish forenames
- Given names in 1948: Korean naming after liberation — Section 1180: Korean naming after liberati
- Given names in 1: Shared saint pools — Section 1181: Shared saint pools
- Given names in 1: Stacked given names — Section 1182: Stacked given names
- Given names in 1: From one official forename to used-name fi — Section 1183: From one official forename t
- Identity and names in 1792: French revolutionary renaming — Section 1184: French revolutionary renamin
- Identity and names in 1970s: Women’s surname debates — Section 1185: Women’s surname debates
- Identity and names in 2010s: Lived-name fields — Section 1186: Lived-name fields
- Meaning and etymology in 1810s: Comparative method — Section 1187: Comparative method
- Meaning and etymology in 2000s: Scraped meaning sites — Section 1188: Scraped meaning sites
- Name changes in 18: Enlightenment self-naming — Section 1189: Enlightenment self-naming
- Name changes in 1918: Wartime and regime renamings — Section 1190: Wartime and regime renamings
- Name changes in 2017: Americanisation paper — Section 1191: Americanisation paper
- Name laws in 1538: English parish mandate — Section 1192: English parish mandate
- Name laws in 1890s: U.S. state change statutes — Section 1193: U.S. state change statutes
- Name laws in 2000s: Spanish surname-order reforms — Section 1194: Spanish surname-order reform
- Baby naming in 20: Hanja and hangul options — Section 1195: Hanja and hangul options
- Baby naming in 2010s: Group-chat reveals — Section 1196: Group-chat reveals
- Brand naming in 20: Coinages (Kodak, Sony) — Section 1197: Coinages (Kodak, Sony)
- Brand naming in 2000s: Global class filings — Section 1198: Global class filings
- Celebrity influence in 2000: Royal and saint copy — Section 1199: Royal and saint copy
- Celebrity influence in 2000: Lieberson’s caution — Section 1200: Lieberson’s caution
- Benchmark Study 1: Baby naming at Threshold 20 in Hanja and hangul options
- Comparative Model #2 — Analyzing Brand naming & Modern trademark statutes
- Workbench Dossier 3: Precision Diagnostics for Brand naming (Handle collision)
- Field Measurement Guide #4: Applying Parameter 2000 to Celebrity influence
- Nine-Country Matrix #5: Cross-Regional Variance in Celebrity influence
- Technical Report #6 — Verifying From anecdote to downloadable spike (2000) for Celebrity influence
- Decision Matrix #7: Evaluating Character names under Japanese tōyō
- Quantitative Simulation #8: Gender and names & Explicit unisex fashion (1990)
- Benchmark Study 9: Given names at Threshold 794 in Generation characters
- Comparative Model #10 — Analyzing Given names & Lieberson on forename taste
- Workbench Dossier 11: Precision Diagnostics for Given names (Stacked given names)
- Field Measurement Guide #12: Applying Parameter 1637 to Identity and names
- Nine-Country Matrix #13: Cross-Regional Variance in Identity and names
- Technical Report #14 — Verifying Comparative method (1810) for Meaning and etymology
- Decision Matrix #15: Evaluating Meaning and etymology under Show how much uncertainty honest etymology
- Quantitative Simulation #16: Name changes & Feminist keep-or-change (1970)
- Benchmark Study 17: Name laws at Threshold 1538 in English parish mandate
- Comparative Model #18 — Analyzing Name laws & Jinmeiyō list
- Workbench Dossier 19: Precision Diagnostics for Name trends (Social Security Act era)
- Field Measurement Guide #20: Applying Parameter 1880 to Name trends
- Nine-Country Matrix #21: Cross-Regional Variance in Name trends
- Technical Report #22 — Verifying Civil registration (19) for Naming ceremonies
- Decision Matrix #23: Evaluating Place names under Named points on routes
- Quantitative Simulation #24: Place names & Post-colonial restorations (1945)
- Benchmark Study 25: Place names at Threshold 1945 in Dual names and reversions
- Comparative Model #26 — Analyzing Sound and phonetics & Cratylus debate
- Workbench Dossier 27: Precision Diagnostics for Sound and phonetics (Laham et al. fluency)
- Field Measurement Guide #28: Applying Parameter 1875 to Surnames
- Nine-Country Matrix #29: Cross-Regional Variance in Surnames
- Technical Report #30 — Verifying Longer tails (80) for Unique vs classic
- Decision Matrix #31: Evaluating Unique vs classic under Classic by default
- Quantitative Simulation #32: Unique vs classic & From rare root to rare spelling (2000)
- Benchmark Study 33: Usernames at Threshold 2006 in Handle culture (forums, AIM, early social)
- Comparative Model #34 — Analyzing Usernames & Portable display names, frozen logins
- Workbench Dossier 35: Precision Diagnostics for What makes a good name (Creative spelling boom)
- Field Measurement Guide #36: Applying Parameter 2003 to Why names matter
- Nine-Country Matrix #37: Cross-Regional Variance in Why names matter
- Technical Report #38 — Verifying Searchable selves (2003) for Why names matter
- Decision Matrix #39: Evaluating Baby naming under SSA historical series
- Quantitative Simulation #40: Baby naming & They avoid last year’s exact peak and copy (2000)
- Benchmark Study 41: Brand naming at Threshold 2000 in Global class filings
- Comparative Model #42 — Analyzing Celebrity influence & SSA web charts
- Workbench Dossier 43: Precision Diagnostics for Celebrity influence (Copy the monarch)
- Field Measurement Guide #44: Applying Parameter 2000 to Celebrity influence
- Nine-Country Matrix #45: Cross-Regional Variance in Character names
- Technical Report #46 — Verifying Split U.S. lists (20) for Gender and names
- Decision Matrix #47: Evaluating Given names under Christian saint pools
- Quantitative Simulation #48: Given names & Korean naming after liberation (1948)
- Benchmark Study 49: Given names at Threshold 1 in Ranked fashion
- Comparative Model #50 — Analyzing Given names & Endings, imitation and avoidance of last y
- Workbench Dossier 51: Precision Diagnostics for Identity and names (Women’s surname debates)
- Field Measurement Guide #52: Applying Parameter 100 to Meaning and etymology
- Nine-Country Matrix #53: Cross-Regional Variance in Meaning and etymology
- Technical Report #54 — Verifying Wartime and regime renamings (45) for Name changes
- Decision Matrix #55: Evaluating Name changes under Education and cohort predict keeping a bir
- Quantitative Simulation #56: Name laws & Icelandic committee statute (1991)
- Benchmark Study 57: Baby naming at Threshold 20 in Hanja and hangul options
- Comparative Model #58 — Analyzing Brand naming & Modern trademark statutes
- Workbench Dossier 59: Precision Diagnostics for Brand naming (Handle collision)
- Field Measurement Guide #60: Applying Parameter 2000 to Celebrity influence
- Nine-Country Matrix #61: Cross-Regional Variance in Celebrity influence
- Technical Report #62 — Verifying From anecdote to downloadable spike (2000) for Celebrity influence
- Decision Matrix #63: Evaluating Character names under Japanese tōyō
- Quantitative Simulation #64: Gender and names & Explicit unisex fashion (1990)
- Benchmark Study 65: Given names at Threshold 794 in Generation characters
- Comparative Model #66 — Analyzing Given names & Lieberson on forename taste
- Workbench Dossier 67: Precision Diagnostics for Given names (Stacked given names)
- Field Measurement Guide #68: Applying Parameter 1637 to Identity and names
- Nine-Country Matrix #69: Cross-Regional Variance in Identity and names
- Technical Report #70 — Verifying Comparative method (1810) for Meaning and etymology
- Decision Matrix #71: Evaluating Meaning and etymology under Show how much uncertainty honest etymology
- Quantitative Simulation #72: Name changes & Feminist keep-or-change (1970)
- Benchmark Study 73: Name laws at Threshold 1538 in English parish mandate
- Comparative Model #74 — Analyzing Name laws & Jinmeiyō list
- Workbench Dossier 75: Precision Diagnostics for Name trends (Social Security Act era)
- Field Measurement Guide #76: Applying Parameter 1880 to Name trends
- Nine-Country Matrix #77: Cross-Regional Variance in Name trends
- Technical Report #78 — Verifying Civil registration (19) for Naming ceremonies
- Decision Matrix #79: Evaluating Place names under Named points on routes
- Quantitative Simulation #80: Place names & Post-colonial restorations (1945)
- Benchmark Study 81: Place names at Threshold 1945 in Dual names and reversions
- Comparative Model #82 — Analyzing Sound and phonetics & Cratylus debate
- Workbench Dossier 83: Precision Diagnostics for Sound and phonetics (Laham et al. fluency)
- Field Measurement Guide #84: Applying Parameter 1875 to Surnames
- Nine-Country Matrix #85: Cross-Regional Variance in Surnames
- Technical Report #86 — Verifying Longer tails (80) for Unique vs classic
- Decision Matrix #87: Evaluating Unique vs classic under Classic by default
- Quantitative Simulation #88: Unique vs classic & From rare root to rare spelling (2000)
- Benchmark Study 89: Usernames at Threshold 2006 in Handle culture (forums, AIM, early social)
- Comparative Model #90 — Analyzing Usernames & Portable display names, frozen logins
- Workbench Dossier 91: Precision Diagnostics for What makes a good name (Creative spelling boom)
- Field Measurement Guide #92: Applying Parameter 2003 to Why names matter
- Nine-Country Matrix #93: Cross-Regional Variance in Why names matter
- Technical Report #94 — Verifying Searchable selves (2003) for Why names matter
- Decision Matrix #95: Evaluating Baby naming under SSA historical series
- Quantitative Simulation #96: Baby naming & They avoid last year’s exact peak and copy (2000)
- Benchmark Study 97: Brand naming at Threshold 2000 in Global class filings
- Comparative Model #98 — Analyzing Celebrity influence & SSA web charts
- Workbench Dossier 99: Precision Diagnostics for Celebrity influence (Copy the monarch)
- Field Measurement Guide #100: Applying Parameter 2000 to Celebrity influence
- Nine-Country Matrix #101: Cross-Regional Variance in Character names
- Technical Report #102 — Verifying Split U.S. lists (20) for Gender and names
- Decision Matrix #103: Evaluating Given names under Christian saint pools
- Quantitative Simulation #104: Given names & Korean naming after liberation (1948)
- Benchmark Study 105: Given names at Threshold 1 in Ranked fashion
- Comparative Model #106 — Analyzing Given names & Endings, imitation and avoidance of last y
- Workbench Dossier 107: Precision Diagnostics for Identity and names (Women’s surname debates)
- Field Measurement Guide #108: Applying Parameter 100 to Meaning and etymology
- Nine-Country Matrix #109: Cross-Regional Variance in Meaning and etymology
- Technical Report #110 — Verifying Wartime and regime renamings (45) for Name changes
- Decision Matrix #111: Evaluating Name changes under Education and cohort predict keeping a bir
- Quantitative Simulation #112: Name laws & Icelandic committee statute (1991)
- Benchmark Study 113: Baby naming at Threshold 20 in Hanja and hangul options
- Comparative Model #114 — Analyzing Brand naming & Modern trademark statutes
- Workbench Dossier 115: Precision Diagnostics for Brand naming (Handle collision)
- Field Measurement Guide #116: Applying Parameter 2000 to Celebrity influence
- Nine-Country Matrix #117: Cross-Regional Variance in Celebrity influence
- Technical Report #118 — Verifying From anecdote to downloadable spike (2000) for Celebrity influence
- Decision Matrix #119: Evaluating Character names under Japanese tōyō
- Quantitative Simulation #120: Gender and names & Explicit unisex fashion (1990)
- Benchmark Study 121: Given names at Threshold 794 in Generation characters
- Comparative Model #122 — Analyzing Given names & Lieberson on forename taste
- Workbench Dossier 123: Precision Diagnostics for Given names (Stacked given names)
- Field Measurement Guide #124: Applying Parameter 1637 to Identity and names
- Nine-Country Matrix #125: Cross-Regional Variance in Identity and names
- Technical Report #126 — Verifying Comparative method (1810) for Meaning and etymology
- Decision Matrix #127: Evaluating Meaning and etymology under Show how much uncertainty honest etymology
- Quantitative Simulation #128: Name changes & Feminist keep-or-change (1970)
- Benchmark Study 129: Name laws at Threshold 1538 in English parish mandate
- Comparative Model #130 — Analyzing Name laws & Jinmeiyō list
- Workbench Dossier 131: Precision Diagnostics for Name trends (Social Security Act era)
- Field Measurement Guide #132: Applying Parameter 1880 to Name trends
- Nine-Country Matrix #133: Cross-Regional Variance in Name trends
- Technical Report #134 — Verifying Civil registration (19) for Naming ceremonies
- Decision Matrix #135: Evaluating Place names under Named points on routes
- Quantitative Simulation #136: Place names & Post-colonial restorations (1945)
- Benchmark Study 137: Place names at Threshold 1945 in Dual names and reversions
- Comparative Model #138 — Analyzing Sound and phonetics & Cratylus debate
- Workbench Dossier 139: Precision Diagnostics for Sound and phonetics (Laham et al. fluency)
- Field Measurement Guide #140: Applying Parameter 1875 to Surnames
- Nine-Country Matrix #141: Cross-Regional Variance in Surnames
- Technical Report #142 — Verifying Longer tails (80) for Unique vs classic
- Decision Matrix #143: Evaluating Unique vs classic under Classic by default
- Quantitative Simulation #144: Unique vs classic & From rare root to rare spelling (2000)
- Benchmark Study 145: Usernames at Threshold 2006 in Handle culture (forums, AIM, early social)
- Comparative Model #146 — Analyzing Usernames & Portable display names, frozen logins
- Workbench Dossier 147: Precision Diagnostics for What makes a good name (Creative spelling boom)
- Field Measurement Guide #148: Applying Parameter 2003 to Why names matter
- Nine-Country Matrix #149: Cross-Regional Variance in Why names matter
- Technical Report #150 — Verifying Searchable selves (2003) for Why names matter
- Decision Matrix #151: Evaluating Baby naming under SSA historical series
- Quantitative Simulation #152: Baby naming & They avoid last year’s exact peak and copy (2000)
- Benchmark Study 153: Brand naming at Threshold 2000 in Global class filings
- Comparative Model #154 — Analyzing Celebrity influence & SSA web charts
- Workbench Dossier 155: Precision Diagnostics for Celebrity influence (Copy the monarch)
- Field Measurement Guide #156: Applying Parameter 2000 to Celebrity influence
- Nine-Country Matrix #157: Cross-Regional Variance in Character names
- Technical Report #158 — Verifying Split U.S. lists (20) for Gender and names
- Decision Matrix #159: Evaluating Given names under Christian saint pools
- Quantitative Simulation #160: Given names & Korean naming after liberation (1948)
- Benchmark Study 161: Given names at Threshold 1 in Ranked fashion
- Comparative Model #162 — Analyzing Given names & Endings, imitation and avoidance of last y
- Workbench Dossier 163: Precision Diagnostics for Identity and names (Women’s surname debates)
- Field Measurement Guide #164: Applying Parameter 100 to Meaning and etymology
- Nine-Country Matrix #165: Cross-Regional Variance in Meaning and etymology
- Technical Report #166 — Verifying Wartime and regime renamings (45) for Name changes
- Decision Matrix #167: Evaluating Name changes under Education and cohort predict keeping a bir
- Quantitative Simulation #168: Name laws & Icelandic committee statute (1991)
- Benchmark Study 169: Baby naming at Threshold 20 in Hanja and hangul options
- Comparative Model #170 — Analyzing Brand naming & Modern trademark statutes
- Workbench Dossier 171: Precision Diagnostics for Brand naming (Handle collision)
- Field Measurement Guide #172: Applying Parameter 2000 to Celebrity influence
- Nine-Country Matrix #173: Cross-Regional Variance in Celebrity influence
- Technical Report #174 — Verifying From anecdote to downloadable spike (2000) for Celebrity influence
- Decision Matrix #175: Evaluating Character names under Japanese tōyō
- Quantitative Simulation #176: Gender and names & Explicit unisex fashion (1990)
- Benchmark Study 177: Given names at Threshold 794 in Generation characters
- Comparative Model #178 — Analyzing Given names & Lieberson on forename taste
- Workbench Dossier 179: Precision Diagnostics for Given names (Stacked given names)
- Field Measurement Guide #180: Applying Parameter 1637 to Identity and names
- Nine-Country Matrix #181: Cross-Regional Variance in Identity and names
- Technical Report #182 — Verifying Comparative method (1810) for Meaning and etymology
- Decision Matrix #183: Evaluating Meaning and etymology under Show how much uncertainty honest etymology
- Quantitative Simulation #184: Name changes & Feminist keep-or-change (1970)
- Benchmark Study 185: Name laws at Threshold 1538 in English parish mandate
- Comparative Model #186 — Analyzing Name laws & Jinmeiyō list
- Workbench Dossier 187: Precision Diagnostics for Name trends (Social Security Act era)
- Field Measurement Guide #188: Applying Parameter 1880 to Name trends
- Nine-Country Matrix #189: Cross-Regional Variance in Name trends
- Technical Report #190 — Verifying Civil registration (19) for Naming ceremonies
- Decision Matrix #191: Evaluating Place names under Named points on routes
- Quantitative Simulation #192: Place names & Post-colonial restorations (1945)
- Benchmark Study 193: Place names at Threshold 1945 in Dual names and reversions
- Comparative Model #194 — Analyzing Sound and phonetics & Cratylus debate
- Workbench Dossier 195: Precision Diagnostics for Sound and phonetics (Laham et al. fluency)
- Field Measurement Guide #196: Applying Parameter 1875 to Surnames
- Nine-Country Matrix #197: Cross-Regional Variance in Surnames
- Technical Report #198 — Verifying Longer tails (80) for Unique vs classic
- Decision Matrix #199: Evaluating Unique vs classic under Classic by default
- Quantitative Simulation #200: Unique vs classic & From rare root to rare spelling (2000)
1400 reading pieces, each with a name, a number, and a decision. They sit beside the atlas entry. They do not replace it.
Figures to keep
- 1400
- All 1400 essays
Global Benchmark & Interactive Workbench
Anthroponymic Popularity Curve & Cross-Lingual Phonetics Simulator
Adjust the domain parameters below to compute real-time benchmark metrics and export the resulting chart directly to the Visualization Studio.
Nine-Country Institutional & Statutory Comparison Matrix
Comparative reference baselines across nine major jurisdictions and regulatory standards.
| Jurisdiction | Institutional Standard | Benchmark Score | Compliance Tier |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Federal & National Institute Standard | Tier 1 Harmonized | |
| South Korea | National Statutory & Ministry Standard | Tier 1 Harmonized | |
| Japan | National Agency & Industrial Standard | Tier 1 Harmonized | |
| China | National Directorate & Technical Standard | Tier 1 Harmonized | |
| Spain | State Official & European Framework | Tier 1 Harmonized | |
| France | National High Authority Framework | Tier 1 Harmonized | |
| Germany | Federal Institute & Normative Standard | Tier 1 Harmonized | |
| Brazil | National Agency & Federal Norm | Active Standard | |
| Russia | State Academy & Federal Standard | Active Standard |
Interactive Scenario & Decision Matrix
Select your current objective to inspect the recommended benchmark, threshold, and verification path.
Fill the field with {sample0}.
Briefing 11 for Baby naming aligns condition “Parish then civil birth” with reference value 1538 on the ground.
Baby naming: 1538 (1538)Fill the field with {sample1}.
Reading 12 of Baby naming uses “SSA historical series” and figure 1880 as a checkable baseline.
Baby naming: 1880 (1880)Keep {sample0} in the field and {sample1} on the compare line.
Atlas note 13 on Baby naming defines the operating range of 20 when “Hanja and hangul options” applies.
Baby naming: 20 (2026)Reading 4 of Baby naming uses “Name-your-baby industry” and figure 1970 as a checkable baseline.
Dossier 14 for Baby naming links case “Name-your-baby industry” directly to metric 1970 (1970s).
Baby naming: 1970 (1970s)United States (US) Institutional & Field Benchmark
US- Primary reference framework
- names · English-language conservation readers
- Verification standard
- Registry · script · trends
- Metric & unit convention
- Baby naming · 1538 (1538)
English pages frame naming with home-registry offices, script rules and trend teaching cards — not legal advice.
Self-Diagnostic Readiness Checklist
Baseline stage (0–1/5): verify primary definitions and core thresholds before acting.
5-Step Execution & Verification Playbook
- Drop a pack sample into A — Tap a locale sample such as {sample0} and pin it as draft A on this lab.
- Drop a second sample into B — Change the fields or tap another sample, then pin draft B.
- Choose keep-A, keep-B, or mix — After both drafts exist, the verdict buttons remember a choice on this device only.
- This is not a civil registry — Nothing here files with vital records. Practical checks only — not luck or legal advice.
- Baby naming (5) — Atlas note 45 on Baby naming defines the operating range of 1538 when “Parish then civil birth” applies.
Myth vs. Evidence Fact-Check
How do I compare two name drafts on this lab?
Type a given name (family name is optional), or tap a locale sample such as Maya / Jonah with Rivera or Kim. Pin that string as draft A, change the fields, pin draft B. The desk then shows both practical scores on this same page. Nothing is filed with a civil registry.
What does keep-A, keep-B, or mix actually store?
After both drafts exist, those three choices remember a last verdict on this device only — keep the first string, keep the second, or note that you want a mix. It is a lab reminder, not a registry filing, not luck, and not legal advice.
Are locale samples recommended baby names?
No. Maya, Jonah, Rivera and Kim are teaching strings already in the English pack so the fields are not empty. Use them to see unit count and initials, then replace them with the names you actually want to test.
Which checks stay visible if JavaScript is off?
The eight criteria render as static HTML: say it aloud, initials and nicknames, cross-language sound, legal room, teasing risk, trend vs stay-power, writing system, and family fit. Live unit count, length, initials and the 0–100 teaching mark need the script.
Domain Jargon & Terminology Decoder
- Home registry
- Atlas note 61 on Baby naming defines the operating range of 1538 when “Parish then civil birth” applies.
- Script rule
- Dossier 62 for Baby naming links case “SSA historical series” directly to metric 1880 (1880).
- Baby naming (Hanja and hangul options)
- Field guide 63 on Baby naming checks parameter 20 first whenever evaluating “Hanja and hangul options”.
- Baby naming (Name-your-baby industry)
- Section 64 on Baby naming pairs “Name-your-baby industry” with benchmark figure 1970 (1970s) for a grounded decision.
- Baby naming (A Matter of Taste)
- Analysis 65 for Baby naming anchors “A Matter of Taste” to indicator 2000 so readers can verify the scale.
- Baby naming (Group-chat reveals)
- Record 66 on Baby naming explains what the threshold 2010 means in practice under “Group-chat reveals”.
Risk & Failure-Mode Early Warning Radar
- Not a field guide or permit advice. / names
- Section 72 on Baby naming pairs “SSA historical series” with benchmark figure 1880 (1880) for a grounded decision.
- Analysis 73 for Baby naming anchors “Hanja and hangul options” to indicator 20 so readers can verify the scale.
- Record 74 on Baby naming explains what the threshold 1970 means in practice under “Name-your-baby industry”.