Sound and phonetics in 2000: Lieberson on endings · 553

Names are mouthfuls first — how phonotactics, stress and sound symbolism shape what feels sharp, soft or “foreign” without proving fate. Before a name means anything in a dictionary, it is a sequence of sounds that a language either welcomes or resists. Sound symbolism research (bouba/kiki, phonesthemes) shows that people share hunches about which noises feel round or spiky. Those hunches are not personality forecasts.

This page is about ears and mouths: why some names travel, why some get shortened, and why “it just sounds right” is a phonetic claim dressed as intuition. Does a harsh-sounding name make a harsh person? No. Listeners may attach metaphors to sounds. That is their poetry, not a developmental law.

Across many languages, people tend to match a rounded nonce word to a rounded shape and a spiky word to a spiky shape — a famous sound-symbolism demo. Why do name endings cluster in fashion? Lieberson noted that parents copy the feel of neighbouring names. Shared endings (-en, -a, -son) are phonetic fashion, visible in SSA and ONS series.