Given names in 1948: Korean naming after liberation · 460
e most frequent U.S. girls’ name for much of 1880–1961 — a dated band, not a live #1 claim. Should I pick a na arks a sibling or cousin cohort. Korean 돌림자 is a related kin design — description, not fortune-telling. Yes. I Where can I see how common a given name is? SSA (U.S. from 1880), ONS (England and Wales) and Statistics Korea The spelling on a form and the sound in a classroom can differ. For Given names the year of that difference is 1948, the line is “Korean naming after liberation,” and the figure is 1948. A popularity rank is not a personality score. Forenames will keep being used as cheap identity cues.
Where can I see how common a given name is? SSA (U.S. from 1880), ONS (England and Wales) and Statistics Korea publish counts. Always keep the year on the citation. They can be used as signals. Bertrand and Mullainathan showed U.S. employers treating forenames as racial cues on otherwise identical résumés.
In Chinese practice a shared character marks a sibling or cousin cohort. Korean 돌림자 is a related kin design — description, not fortune-telling. Yes. Iceland’s committee, German Namensrecht and Japan’s kanji lists all constrain what may be filed. Usually yes — additional given names. Some systems treat them as optional; others expect several.
Did Mary really dominate U.S. girls’ lists? In SSA historical files, Mary was the most frequent U.S. girls’ name for much of 1880–1961 — a dated band, not a live #1 claim. Should I pick a name from last year’s leaderboard? Only if you like that fashion. Lieberson treated peaks as taste, not quality.
The two places are the register and the nickname. 1948’s “Korean naming after liberation” splits them. The figure is 1948.1948
Figures to keep
- Year of the rule
- 1948
- Figure on the name
- 1948
- Topic
- Given names
- Line in the record
- Korean naming after liberation
Given names in 2000: Lieberson on forename taste · 461Next essayAll 1100 essays1100