Skip to content
Leadership talent

Origins

How leadership talent was named, dated and argued — a history of claims, not a verdict on a child.

Carlyle made leadership a soul. Armies and churches already had schools for it. Twentieth-century industrial psychology tried to test it and kept bumping into situations.

The timeline below follows dated arguments and institutions, not a national myth of genius and not a group ranking.

Origin

19th c. great-man to 20th c. org psych · Europe / US business schools — Carlyle made leadership a soul. Armies and churches already had schools for it. Twentieth-century industrial psychology tried to test it and kept bumping into situations.

Timeline

  1. Carlyle’s Heroes

    The great-man essay that still infects business books.

  2. Weber on charisma

    A sociological relation, later flattened into a glow.

  3. Lewin’s climate studies

    Autocratic/democratic/laissez-faire as experimental climates — dated, still a teaching fossil.

  4. Fiedler’s contingency

    Effectiveness depends on the match of style and situation.

  5. Burns on transforming leadership

    A moralised contrast with transactional — influential and soft as measurement.

  6. Big Five leader studies

    Modest trait correlations, lots of halo.

  7. Mandela’s presidency begins

    A public file of coalition after prison — situation plus character talk.

  8. Sirleaf’s election

    A postwar reconstruction leadership file in Liberia.

  9. Critical leadership studies

    Followers, gender, colonial leftovers as the missing variables.

  10. Remote-work coordination

    A new situation that broke some charisma theatres.

Eras

Shifts

Leadership talent: keep the dates visible. Names of talents are younger than the work they try to capture.

OriginsScienceSignsDevelopPracticeExemplarsMyths