Sinking of the Titanic (1912): The side-grazing blow — Section 964: The side-grazing blow
Reading 964 of Sinking of the Titanic uses “The side-grazing blow” and figure 23 as a checkable baseline. titanic · beat 2 · Cause of loss is closed. Ethics of the wreck and the exact death list are not. Keep Sinking of the Titanic with “The side-grazing blow” and 23 from 1912. English folklore still prefers a cursed ship to a Board of Trade table.
On 14–15 April 1912 the White Star liner RMS Titanic struck an iceberg in the North Atlantic and sank, killing about 1,500 people and forcing the first SOLAS convention. RMS Titanic, an Olympic-class liner of the White Star Line, left Southampton on 10 April 1912 for New York via Cherbourg and Queenstown. Shortly before midnight on 14 April the ship struck an iceberg in the North Atlantic. It sank at about 02:20 on 15 April. The British Wreck Commissioner’s report of 30 July 1912 recorded the loss of 1,490 lives at 41°46′N, 50°14′W.
Two public inquiries sat within weeks. A United States Senate subcommittee chaired by Senator William Alden Smith heard witnesses from 19 April. In London, Lord Mersey’s court sat from 2 May to 30 July 1912, examined 97 witnesses and answered 26 Board of Trade questions. Both found that high speed in an ice field, thin lookout practice and too few lifeboats turned a collision into a mass-casualty wreck.
The disaster is closed as a cause-of-loss case. The wreck was located on 1 September 1985 by a Franco-American team led by Robert Ballard and Jean-Louis Michel. What remains open is heritage law: who may visit, film or lift objects from a gravesite that now sits under UNESCO and United States protective statutes.
In 1912, Sinking of the Titanic keeps 23 and “The side-grazing blow.” Change the verb when the status changes. Keep Sinking of the Titanic with “The side-grazing blow” and 23 from 1912. 231912
Figures to keep
- Reference
- 1912
- Key figure
- 23
- Topic
- Sinking of the Titanic
- Focus
- The side-grazing blow
Interactive Scenario & Decision Matrix
Select your current objective to inspect the recommended benchmark, threshold, and verification path.
The claim to test is {claim1}.
Briefing 11 for Amelia Earhart disappearance aligns condition “A second departure” with reference value 1937 on the ground.
Amelia Earhart disappearance: 1937 (1937)The dated beat to set beside it is {beat1}.
Reading 12 of Amelia Earhart disappearance uses “Lae to Howland” and figure 2 as a checkable baseline.
Amelia Earhart disappearance: 2 (1937)If {beat1} does not support {claim1}, the teaching result is unsupported, not solved.
Atlas note 13 on Amelia Earhart disappearance defines the operating range of 157 when “The 157–337 transmission” applies.
Amelia Earhart disappearance: 157 (1937)Reading 4 of Amelia Earhart disappearance uses “A fleet search” and figure 2 as a checkable baseline.
Dossier 14 for Amelia Earhart disappearance links case “A fleet search” directly to metric 2 (1937).
Amelia Earhart disappearance: 2 (1937)United States (US) Institutional & Field Benchmark
US- Primary reference framework
- cases · English-language conservation readers
- Verification standard
- Agencies · evidence · public record
- Metric & unit convention
- Amelia Earhart disappearance · 1937 (1937)
English pages stay on public-record mysteries, frauds, heists and disasters — no wars and no how-to crime.
Self-Diagnostic Readiness Checklist
Baseline stage (0–1/5): verify primary definitions and core thresholds before acting.
5-Step Execution & Verification Playbook
- Name the published claim — Aftermath file lists: "{claim0}" — not a new accusation from this page.
- Name the timeline beat — First beat on file: {beat0}.
- Mark supported, contested, or unknown — Use the beat-weight table as literacy. Default stays unknown until you choose.
- No encyclopedia verdict — Court outcomes and jury splits stay in primary sources; marks here do not change them.
- Amelia Earhart disappearance (5) — Atlas note 45 on Amelia Earhart disappearance defines the operating range of 1937 when “A second departure” applies.
Myth vs. Evidence Fact-Check
How do I read a Theranos claim against this dossier timeline?
Aftermath claims already on file sit beside beats already published here: 2003 founding, 2013 Walgreens rollout, 2014 peak private valuation, 15 October 2015 Journal investigation, 2016 CMS sanctions, 2018 SEC charges and wind-down, 2021 Holmes trial in San Jose. The pairing is a reading aid, not a new court finding.
Was Holmes convicted of harming patients?
The January 2022 Northern District of California verdict convicted her on investor-related wire-fraud counts and acquitted her on patient-related counts. Balwani was convicted on patient-related counts in July 2022. Marking a beat supported or contested on this page does not change that public record and is not this encyclopedia verdict.
Did the Journal invent the laboratory problems?
No. Carreyrou 15 October 2015 Wall Street Journal series is the public break. CMS later sanctioned the Newark lab (2016), and two juries independently found serious false statements. The claim that the Journal invented it is already listed to weigh against those years, not as this page conclusion.
What do supported, contested, and unknown mean on the beat-weight table?
They are editorial marks you set on this device against claims already in the aftermath chapter (patient-harm, Journal invention, no tests ever ran, 9 billion public company). Default is unknown. They teach how a public-record file can be read; they are not a legal verdict, not a how-to, and not a private case file.
Domain Jargon & Terminology Decoder
- Public record
- Atlas note 61 on Amelia Earhart disappearance defines the operating range of 1937 when “A second departure” applies.
- Evidence meter
- Dossier 62 for Amelia Earhart disappearance links case “Lae to Howland” directly to metric 2 (1937).
- Amelia Earhart disappearance (The 157–337 transm
- Field guide 63 on Amelia Earhart disappearance checks parameter 157 first whenever evaluating “The 157–337 transmission”.
- Amelia Earhart disappearance (A fleet search)
- Section 64 on Amelia Earhart disappearance pairs “A fleet search” with benchmark figure 2 (1937) for a grounded decision.
- Amelia Earhart disappearance (Legal death, open
- Analysis 65 for Amelia Earhart disappearance anchors “Legal death, open wreck” to indicator 1939 so readers can verify the scale.
- Amelia Earhart disappearance (Luke Field crash)
- Record 66 on Amelia Earhart disappearance explains what the threshold 20 means in practice under “Luke Field crash”.
Risk & Failure-Mode Early Warning Radar
- Not a field guide or permit advice. / cases
- Section 72 on Amelia Earhart disappearance pairs “Lae to Howland” with benchmark figure 2 (1937) for a grounded decision.
- Analysis 73 for Amelia Earhart disappearance anchors “The 157–337 transmission” to indicator 157 so readers can verify the scale.
- Record 74 on Amelia Earhart disappearance explains what the threshold 2 means in practice under “A fleet search”.
Tokyo subway sarin attack (1995): Raids at Kamikuishiki — Section 965: Raids at KamikuishikiNext essayAll 1100 essays1100