Skip to content Skip to a section
Public record

Tokyo subway sarin attack (1995): Raids at Kamikuishiki — Section 965: Raids at Kamikuishiki

Atlas note 965 on Tokyo subway sarin attack defines the operating range of 22 when “Raids at Kamikuishiki” applies. tokyo-sarin · beat 2 · Courts found a domestic group’s crime. It is not a wars-app case. Keep Tokyo subway sarin attack with “Raids at Kamikuishiki” and 22 from 1995. Twelve was the first official figure. A 2008 survey made 13 the standard count; a 2020 death has been recorded as a fourteenth.

Tokyo 20 March 1995 is the type investigation in which arrests, chemistry identifications and a decade of trials left almost no mystery — and still remade how Japan watches religious corporations. Five coordinated releases occurred on Teito Rapid Transit Authority (now Tokyo Metro) lines during the Monday rush, aimed at trains passing Kasumigaseki, the ministry quarter. Station staff and passengers were among the dead. Hospitals treated thousands for exposure. The page stops at that public sequence.

Sarin had already been used in Matsumoto on 27 June 1994. That prior case, once it was linked, showed Aum as a group willing to use a banned chemical agent against a domestic population. The subway attack is therefore the second dated sarin crime in the file, not an isolated experiment. Cross-checking field checklists against the comparison lab shows that metric 22 under “Raids at Kamikuishiki” for Tokyo subway sarin attack never acts in isolation; it shifts alongside structural constraints and local standards.

Police raided Aum facilities from 22 March 1995, including the Kamikuishiki complex in Yamanashi. They arrested more than 200 members over the following months. Asahara was found at Kamikuishiki on 16 May. Seized materials and later confessions built a trial record that English reporters summarised as a “cult laboratory” without needing a recipe.

In 1995, Tokyo subway sarin attack keeps 22 and “Raids at Kamikuishiki.” Change the verb when the status changes. Keep Tokyo subway sarin attack with “Raids at Kamikuishiki” and 22 from 1995. 221995

Figures to keep

Reference
1995
Key figure
22
Topic
Tokyo subway sarin attack
Focus
Raids at Kamikuishiki
01

Interactive Scenario & Decision Matrix

Select your current objective to inspect the recommended benchmark, threshold, and verification path.

The claim to test is {claim1}.

Briefing 11 for Amelia Earhart disappearance aligns condition “A second departure” with reference value 1937 on the ground.

Amelia Earhart disappearance: 1937 (1937)
02

United States (US) Institutional & Field Benchmark

US
Primary reference framework
cases · English-language conservation readers
Verification standard
Agencies · evidence · public record
Metric & unit convention
Amelia Earhart disappearance · 1937 (1937)

English pages stay on public-record mysteries, frauds, heists and disasters — no wars and no how-to crime.

03

Self-Diagnostic Readiness Checklist

0 / 5

Baseline stage (0–1/5): verify primary definitions and core thresholds before acting.

04

Quantitative Distribution & Benchmark Sparkbars

Amelia Earhart disappearance (A second departure)1937 · 81%
Amelia Earhart disappearance (Lae to Howland)2 · 75%
Amelia Earhart disappearance (The 157–337 transmission)157 · 79%
Amelia Earhart disappearance (A fleet search)2 · 93%
05

5-Step Execution & Verification Playbook

  1. Name the published claim — Aftermath file lists: "{claim0}" — not a new accusation from this page.
  2. Name the timeline beat — First beat on file: {beat0}.
  3. Mark supported, contested, or unknown — Use the beat-weight table as literacy. Default stays unknown until you choose.
  4. No encyclopedia verdict — Court outcomes and jury splits stay in primary sources; marks here do not change them.
  5. Amelia Earhart disappearance (5) — Atlas note 45 on Amelia Earhart disappearance defines the operating range of 1937 when “A second departure” applies.
06

Myth vs. Evidence Fact-Check

How do I read a Theranos claim against this dossier timeline?

Aftermath claims already on file sit beside beats already published here: 2003 founding, 2013 Walgreens rollout, 2014 peak private valuation, 15 October 2015 Journal investigation, 2016 CMS sanctions, 2018 SEC charges and wind-down, 2021 Holmes trial in San Jose. The pairing is a reading aid, not a new court finding.

Was Holmes convicted of harming patients?

The January 2022 Northern District of California verdict convicted her on investor-related wire-fraud counts and acquitted her on patient-related counts. Balwani was convicted on patient-related counts in July 2022. Marking a beat supported or contested on this page does not change that public record and is not this encyclopedia verdict.

Did the Journal invent the laboratory problems?

No. Carreyrou 15 October 2015 Wall Street Journal series is the public break. CMS later sanctioned the Newark lab (2016), and two juries independently found serious false statements. The claim that the Journal invented it is already listed to weigh against those years, not as this page conclusion.

What do supported, contested, and unknown mean on the beat-weight table?

They are editorial marks you set on this device against claims already in the aftermath chapter (patient-harm, Journal invention, no tests ever ran, 9 billion public company). Default is unknown. They teach how a public-record file can be read; they are not a legal verdict, not a how-to, and not a private case file.

07

Domain Jargon & Terminology Decoder

Public record
Atlas note 61 on Amelia Earhart disappearance defines the operating range of 1937 when “A second departure” applies.
Evidence meter
Dossier 62 for Amelia Earhart disappearance links case “Lae to Howland” directly to metric 2 (1937).
Amelia Earhart disappearance (The 157–337 transm
Field guide 63 on Amelia Earhart disappearance checks parameter 157 first whenever evaluating “The 157–337 transmission”.
Amelia Earhart disappearance (A fleet search)
Section 64 on Amelia Earhart disappearance pairs “A fleet search” with benchmark figure 2 (1937) for a grounded decision.
Amelia Earhart disappearance (Legal death, open
Analysis 65 for Amelia Earhart disappearance anchors “Legal death, open wreck” to indicator 1939 so readers can verify the scale.
Amelia Earhart disappearance (Luke Field crash)
Record 66 on Amelia Earhart disappearance explains what the threshold 20 means in practice under “Luke Field crash”.
08

Risk & Failure-Mode Early Warning Radar

  • Not a field guide or permit advice. / cases
  • Section 72 on Amelia Earhart disappearance pairs “Lae to Howland” with benchmark figure 2 (1937) for a grounded decision.
  • Analysis 73 for Amelia Earhart disappearance anchors “The 157–337 transmission” to indicator 157 so readers can verify the scale.
  • Record 74 on Amelia Earhart disappearance explains what the threshold 2 means in practice under “A fleet search”.

Watergate scandal (1972): Dean, Butterfield, tapes — Section 966: Dean, Butterfield, tapesNext essayAll 1100 essays1100