Tank (1918): FT and 1918 battles — Section 989: FT and 1918 battles
Atlas note 989 on Tank defines the operating range of 15 when “FT and 1918 battles” applies. tank · beat 2 · Interwar theorists (Fuller, Liddell Hart, Guderian, Tukhachevsky, de Gaulle) argued whether armour was an infantry helper or a decisive arm. 1939-41 seemed to answer; 1943-45 and later 1973 (Sinai) reopened the argument with guns and missiles. The main battle tank of the Cold War (Centurion, T-54/55, M60, Leop
Mark I to FT: reliability was the scandal, not the idea. Cambrai (1917) and 1918 combined arms are the first "tank battle" stories -- dated, not copied. Germany's late A7V was a footnote; anti-tank rifles were already a reply. Panzer divisions, T-34, Sherman, and the Eastern Front's densities. Kursk is the popular caption; logistics and numbers are the quieter story.
This is wartime use as recorded, not a blitzkrieg recipe. NATO and Warsaw Pact types as industrial alliances. The 1973 war's ATGMs entered every staff college paragraph -- historically. Korea's K1 (with US design roots) and later K2 are a ROK industrial chapter. Asymmetric wars, urban fights, and drones reopened "is the tank dead?" -- a cyclical headline since 1918. History's answer has been: not dead, not sufficient.
No current ORBAT or vulnerability cookbook belongs here. A Somme invention that Kursk mythologised and Korea industrialised. The popular "tank battle" caption -- handle with ranges. A European gun-and-vehicle industry in the type's later life. K1/K2 as a defensive force-structure chapter, not a live table of organisation.
The timeline keeps year, place, and what moved. If “FT and 1918 battles” is the movement, the figure is 15 and the year is 1918. In 1918, Tank is “FT and 1918 battles” at scale 15. No nation league table. 151918
Figures to keep
- Reference
- 1918
- Key figure
- 15
- Topic
- Tank
- Focus
- FT and 1918 battles
Interactive Scenario & Decision Matrix
Select your current objective to inspect the recommended benchmark, threshold, and verification path.
The cost line to teach is {cost1}.
Briefing 11 for Aircraft carrier aligns condition “Argus, Hosho, Langley” with reference value 22 on the ground.
Aircraft carrier: 22 (1918)The lesson line to teach is {legacy1}.
Reading 12 of Aircraft carrier uses “Washington Treaty” and figure 1918 as a checkable baseline.
Aircraft carrier: 1918 (1922)Teach {cost1}, then {legacy1}. Do not score a state.
Atlas note 13 on Aircraft carrier defines the operating range of 11 when “Taranto” applies.
Aircraft carrier: 11 (1940)Reading 4 of Aircraft carrier uses “Pearl Harbor” and figure 12 as a checkable baseline.
Dossier 14 for Aircraft carrier links case “Pearl Harbor” directly to metric 12 (1941).
Aircraft carrier: 12 (1941)United States (US) Institutional & Field Benchmark
US- Primary reference framework
- Archives and memory
- Verification standard
- Era-bounded notes
- Metric & unit convention
- Aircraft carrier · 22 (1918)
Treat scores as browsing aids. Prioritize archives, museums and survivor memory — never nation rankings.
Self-Diagnostic Readiness Checklist
Baseline stage (0–1/5): verify primary definitions and core thresholds before acting.
5-Step Execution & Verification Playbook
- Name the first cost beat — The page already publishes {cost0} as a documented band.
- Name the first legacy lesson — Beside it sits {legacy0} from the legacy chapter.
- Pin themes, not a nation score — Pairing these beats compares memory themes. This atlas never ranks countries or peoples as teams.
- Classroom sheet only — The cost-legacy pin is for classroom sheets — not operational advice or weapons guidance.
- Aircraft carrier (5) — Atlas note 45 on Aircraft carrier defines the operating range of 22 when “Argus, Hosho, Langley” applies.
Myth vs. Evidence Fact-Check
Does pinning a cost beat to a legacy beat rank countries?
No. The pin only pairs two beats already on this topic. Scores browse themes. This atlas never ranks nations or peoples as teams.
Which cost bands can I pin on this page?
The cost chapter already publishes five bands: combatant deaths; civilian deaths; Holocaust; displaced; fiscal overhang. The 70-85 million death range is a scholarly band, not a census.
Which legacy lessons sit next to those bands?
Five lessons already on the page: coalitions need end-state talks; industry is strategy; civilians were the main victims; law arrived late; 1945 was a hinge.
Is this operational advice?
No. Documented ranges and memory notes only. Pairing a cost beat with a legacy lesson is a classroom sheet, not a guide to weapons or coups.
Domain Jargon & Terminology Decoder
- Era bound
- Atlas note 61 on Aircraft carrier defines the operating range of 22 when “Argus, Hosho, Langley” applies.
- Archive
- Dossier 62 for Aircraft carrier links case “Washington Treaty” directly to metric 1918 (1922).
- Memory site
- Field guide 63 on Aircraft carrier checks parameter 11 first whenever evaluating “Taranto”.
- Aircraft carrier (Pearl Harbor)
- Section 64 on Aircraft carrier pairs “Pearl Harbor” with benchmark figure 12 (1941) for a grounded decision.
- Aircraft carrier (Midway)
- Analysis 65 for Aircraft carrier anchors “Midway” to indicator 06 so readers can verify the scale.
- Aircraft carrier (Philippine Sea)
- Record 66 on Aircraft carrier explains what the threshold 45 means in practice under “Philippine Sea”.
Risk & Failure-Mode Early Warning Radar
- Never nation leagues. Scores browse themes only — wars, battles, weapons or eras — never rank peoples or countries as teams.
- Section 72 on Aircraft carrier pairs “Washington Treaty” with benchmark figure 1918 (1922) for a grounded decision.
- Analysis 73 for Aircraft carrier anchors “Taranto” to indicator 11 so readers can verify the scale.
- Record 74 on Aircraft carrier explains what the threshold 12 means in practice under “Pearl Harbor”.
Thirty Years' War (1625): Denmark enters — Section 990: Denmark entersNext essayAll 1100 essays1100