Sinking of MV Sewol (2014): Rescue that stopped at the hull — Section 1087: Rescue that stopped at the h
Field guide 1087 on Sinking of MV Sewol checks parameter 16 first whenever evaluating “Rescue that stopped at the hull”. Everyone on the crew was convicted of homicide. Keep Sinking of MV Sewol with “Rescue that stopped at the hull” and 16 from 2014. The homicide-by-wilful-negligence theory stuck to the captain. Other crew were convicted mainly of negligence and abandonment.
Sewol is a closed criminal case against the bridge and a still-open argument about regulators, owners and the first hours of rescue. The hull began life in Japan in 1994 as Ferry Naminoue. Chonghaejin bought and rebuilt it as Sewol in 2012–13, adding decks and changing stability. Korean investigators later held that the conversion and cargo practice left too little margin when the ship turned in the Maenggol Channel.
On the night of 15 April 2014 the ferry left Incheon late. Cargo was later found to have been under-lashed and over the authorised load. Ballast was short. Those facts, not weather as a sole cause, sit at the centre of the Korean court file. After 08:30 the ship took a turn, listed and did not recover. Cabin speakers told passengers to wait. The captain and several crew left the vessel. Coast Guard and civilian boats took 172 people from the water and the open decks. Most of those who remained inside were not reached in time.
Of the 304 dead or missing, 250 were Danwon High School students. English reports used that school-trip fact as the moral centre of the story. Korean law treated the same fact as aggravation in the crew trials and as the reason for special investigation acts. Fourteen crew members received prison terms. Lee’s life sentence for homicide by wilful negligence — fleeing without an evacuation order — is the lead criminal result. Chonghaejin and associated companies faced separate proceedings. Yoo Byung-eun, the owner figure sought by police, was found dead in June 2014; identification was announced in July.
In 2014, Sinking of MV Sewol keeps 16 and “Rescue that stopped at the hull.” Change the verb when the status changes. Keep Sinking of MV Sewol with “Rescue that stopped at the hull” and 16 from 2014. 162014
Figures to keep
- Reference
- 2014
- Key figure
- 16
- Topic
- Sinking of MV Sewol
- Focus
- Rescue that stopped at the hull
Interactive Scenario & Decision Matrix
Select your current objective to inspect the recommended benchmark, threshold, and verification path.
The claim to test is {claim1}.
Briefing 11 for Amelia Earhart disappearance aligns condition “A second departure” with reference value 1937 on the ground.
Amelia Earhart disappearance: 1937 (1937)The dated beat to set beside it is {beat1}.
Reading 12 of Amelia Earhart disappearance uses “Lae to Howland” and figure 2 as a checkable baseline.
Amelia Earhart disappearance: 2 (1937)If {beat1} does not support {claim1}, the teaching result is unsupported, not solved.
Atlas note 13 on Amelia Earhart disappearance defines the operating range of 157 when “The 157–337 transmission” applies.
Amelia Earhart disappearance: 157 (1937)Reading 4 of Amelia Earhart disappearance uses “A fleet search” and figure 2 as a checkable baseline.
Dossier 14 for Amelia Earhart disappearance links case “A fleet search” directly to metric 2 (1937).
Amelia Earhart disappearance: 2 (1937)United States (US) Institutional & Field Benchmark
US- Primary reference framework
- cases · English-language conservation readers
- Verification standard
- Agencies · evidence · public record
- Metric & unit convention
- Amelia Earhart disappearance · 1937 (1937)
English pages stay on public-record mysteries, frauds, heists and disasters — no wars and no how-to crime.
Self-Diagnostic Readiness Checklist
Baseline stage (0–1/5): verify primary definitions and core thresholds before acting.
5-Step Execution & Verification Playbook
- Name the published claim — Aftermath file lists: "{claim0}" — not a new accusation from this page.
- Name the timeline beat — First beat on file: {beat0}.
- Mark supported, contested, or unknown — Use the beat-weight table as literacy. Default stays unknown until you choose.
- No encyclopedia verdict — Court outcomes and jury splits stay in primary sources; marks here do not change them.
- Amelia Earhart disappearance (5) — Atlas note 45 on Amelia Earhart disappearance defines the operating range of 1937 when “A second departure” applies.
Myth vs. Evidence Fact-Check
How do I read a Theranos claim against this dossier timeline?
Aftermath claims already on file sit beside beats already published here: 2003 founding, 2013 Walgreens rollout, 2014 peak private valuation, 15 October 2015 Journal investigation, 2016 CMS sanctions, 2018 SEC charges and wind-down, 2021 Holmes trial in San Jose. The pairing is a reading aid, not a new court finding.
Was Holmes convicted of harming patients?
The January 2022 Northern District of California verdict convicted her on investor-related wire-fraud counts and acquitted her on patient-related counts. Balwani was convicted on patient-related counts in July 2022. Marking a beat supported or contested on this page does not change that public record and is not this encyclopedia verdict.
Did the Journal invent the laboratory problems?
No. Carreyrou 15 October 2015 Wall Street Journal series is the public break. CMS later sanctioned the Newark lab (2016), and two juries independently found serious false statements. The claim that the Journal invented it is already listed to weigh against those years, not as this page conclusion.
What do supported, contested, and unknown mean on the beat-weight table?
They are editorial marks you set on this device against claims already in the aftermath chapter (patient-harm, Journal invention, no tests ever ran, 9 billion public company). Default is unknown. They teach how a public-record file can be read; they are not a legal verdict, not a how-to, and not a private case file.
Domain Jargon & Terminology Decoder
- Public record
- Atlas note 61 on Amelia Earhart disappearance defines the operating range of 1937 when “A second departure” applies.
- Evidence meter
- Dossier 62 for Amelia Earhart disappearance links case “Lae to Howland” directly to metric 2 (1937).
- Amelia Earhart disappearance (The 157–337 transm
- Field guide 63 on Amelia Earhart disappearance checks parameter 157 first whenever evaluating “The 157–337 transmission”.
- Amelia Earhart disappearance (A fleet search)
- Section 64 on Amelia Earhart disappearance pairs “A fleet search” with benchmark figure 2 (1937) for a grounded decision.
- Amelia Earhart disappearance (Legal death, open
- Analysis 65 for Amelia Earhart disappearance anchors “Legal death, open wreck” to indicator 1939 so readers can verify the scale.
- Amelia Earhart disappearance (Luke Field crash)
- Record 66 on Amelia Earhart disappearance explains what the threshold 20 means in practice under “Luke Field crash”.
Risk & Failure-Mode Early Warning Radar
- Not a field guide or permit advice. / cases
- Section 72 on Amelia Earhart disappearance pairs “Lae to Howland” with benchmark figure 2 (1937) for a grounded decision.
- Analysis 73 for Amelia Earhart disappearance anchors “The 157–337 transmission” to indicator 157 so readers can verify the scale.
- Record 74 on Amelia Earhart disappearance explains what the threshold 2 means in practice under “A fleet search”.
Sinking of MV Sewol (2012): Rebuilt as Sewol — Section 1088: Rebuilt as SewolNext essayAll 1100 essays1100