Tokyo subway sarin attack (1995): Asahara arrested, 16 May — Section 987: Asahara arrested, 16 May
Briefing 987 for Tokyo subway sarin attack aligns condition “Asahara arrested, 16 May” with reference value 16 on the ground. tokyo-sarin · beat 3 · By early 1995 Aum was under suspicion for Matsumoto and for the Sakamoto murders. English later called the subway attack a bolt from the blue. Japanese investigators did not. Keep Tokyo subway sarin attack with “Asahara arrested, 16 May” and 16 from 1995. Five trains, on
Tokyo 20 March 1995 is the type investigation in which arrests, chemistry identifications and a decade of trials left almost no mystery — and still remade how Japan watches religious corporations. Five coordinated releases occurred on Teito Rapid Transit Authority (now Tokyo Metro) lines during the Monday rush, aimed at trains passing Kasumigaseki, the ministry quarter. Station staff and passengers were among the dead. Hospitals treated thousands for exposure. The page stops at that public sequence.
Sarin had already been used in Matsumoto on 27 June 1994. That prior case, once it was linked, showed Aum as a group willing to use a banned chemical agent against a domestic population. The subway attack is therefore the second dated sarin crime in the file, not an isolated experiment. Cross-checking field checklists against the comparison lab shows that metric 16 under “Asahara arrested, 16 May” for Tokyo subway sarin attack never acts in isolation; it shifts alongside structural constraints and local standards.
Police raided Aum facilities from 22 March 1995, including the Kamikuishiki complex in Yamanashi. They arrested more than 200 members over the following months. Asahara was found at Kamikuishiki on 16 May. Seized materials and later confessions built a trial record that English reporters summarised as a “cult laboratory” without needing a recipe.
In 1995, Tokyo subway sarin attack keeps 16 and “Asahara arrested, 16 May.” Change the verb when the status changes. Keep Tokyo subway sarin attack with “Asahara arrested, 16 May” and 16 from 1995. 161995
Figures to keep
- Reference
- 1995
- Key figure
- 16
- Topic
- Tokyo subway sarin attack
- Focus
- Asahara arrested, 16 May
Interactive Scenario & Decision Matrix
Select your current objective to inspect the recommended benchmark, threshold, and verification path.
The claim to test is {claim1}.
Briefing 11 for Amelia Earhart disappearance aligns condition “A second departure” with reference value 1937 on the ground.
Amelia Earhart disappearance: 1937 (1937)The dated beat to set beside it is {beat1}.
Reading 12 of Amelia Earhart disappearance uses “Lae to Howland” and figure 2 as a checkable baseline.
Amelia Earhart disappearance: 2 (1937)If {beat1} does not support {claim1}, the teaching result is unsupported, not solved.
Atlas note 13 on Amelia Earhart disappearance defines the operating range of 157 when “The 157–337 transmission” applies.
Amelia Earhart disappearance: 157 (1937)Reading 4 of Amelia Earhart disappearance uses “A fleet search” and figure 2 as a checkable baseline.
Dossier 14 for Amelia Earhart disappearance links case “A fleet search” directly to metric 2 (1937).
Amelia Earhart disappearance: 2 (1937)United States (US) Institutional & Field Benchmark
US- Primary reference framework
- cases · English-language conservation readers
- Verification standard
- Agencies · evidence · public record
- Metric & unit convention
- Amelia Earhart disappearance · 1937 (1937)
English pages stay on public-record mysteries, frauds, heists and disasters — no wars and no how-to crime.
Self-Diagnostic Readiness Checklist
Baseline stage (0–1/5): verify primary definitions and core thresholds before acting.
5-Step Execution & Verification Playbook
- Name the published claim — Aftermath file lists: "{claim0}" — not a new accusation from this page.
- Name the timeline beat — First beat on file: {beat0}.
- Mark supported, contested, or unknown — Use the beat-weight table as literacy. Default stays unknown until you choose.
- No encyclopedia verdict — Court outcomes and jury splits stay in primary sources; marks here do not change them.
- Amelia Earhart disappearance (5) — Atlas note 45 on Amelia Earhart disappearance defines the operating range of 1937 when “A second departure” applies.
Myth vs. Evidence Fact-Check
How do I read a Theranos claim against this dossier timeline?
Aftermath claims already on file sit beside beats already published here: 2003 founding, 2013 Walgreens rollout, 2014 peak private valuation, 15 October 2015 Journal investigation, 2016 CMS sanctions, 2018 SEC charges and wind-down, 2021 Holmes trial in San Jose. The pairing is a reading aid, not a new court finding.
Was Holmes convicted of harming patients?
The January 2022 Northern District of California verdict convicted her on investor-related wire-fraud counts and acquitted her on patient-related counts. Balwani was convicted on patient-related counts in July 2022. Marking a beat supported or contested on this page does not change that public record and is not this encyclopedia verdict.
Did the Journal invent the laboratory problems?
No. Carreyrou 15 October 2015 Wall Street Journal series is the public break. CMS later sanctioned the Newark lab (2016), and two juries independently found serious false statements. The claim that the Journal invented it is already listed to weigh against those years, not as this page conclusion.
What do supported, contested, and unknown mean on the beat-weight table?
They are editorial marks you set on this device against claims already in the aftermath chapter (patient-harm, Journal invention, no tests ever ran, 9 billion public company). Default is unknown. They teach how a public-record file can be read; they are not a legal verdict, not a how-to, and not a private case file.
Domain Jargon & Terminology Decoder
- Public record
- Atlas note 61 on Amelia Earhart disappearance defines the operating range of 1937 when “A second departure” applies.
- Evidence meter
- Dossier 62 for Amelia Earhart disappearance links case “Lae to Howland” directly to metric 2 (1937).
- Amelia Earhart disappearance (The 157–337 transm
- Field guide 63 on Amelia Earhart disappearance checks parameter 157 first whenever evaluating “The 157–337 transmission”.
- Amelia Earhart disappearance (A fleet search)
- Section 64 on Amelia Earhart disappearance pairs “A fleet search” with benchmark figure 2 (1937) for a grounded decision.
- Amelia Earhart disappearance (Legal death, open
- Analysis 65 for Amelia Earhart disappearance anchors “Legal death, open wreck” to indicator 1939 so readers can verify the scale.
- Amelia Earhart disappearance (Luke Field crash)
- Record 66 on Amelia Earhart disappearance explains what the threshold 20 means in practice under “Luke Field crash”.
Risk & Failure-Mode Early Warning Radar
- Not a field guide or permit advice. / cases
- Section 72 on Amelia Earhart disappearance pairs “Lae to Howland” with benchmark figure 2 (1937) for a grounded decision.
- Analysis 73 for Amelia Earhart disappearance anchors “The 157–337 transmission” to indicator 157 so readers can verify the scale.
- Record 74 on Amelia Earhart disappearance explains what the threshold 2 means in practice under “A fleet search”.
Watergate scandal (1972): Saturday Night Massacre — Section 988: Saturday Night MassacreNext essayAll 1100 essays1100