Skip to content Skip to a section
Public record

Great Train Robbery (1963): Aylesbury, 1964 — Section 975: Aylesbury, 1964

Field guide 975 on Great Train Robbery checks parameter 1964 first whenever evaluating “Aylesbury, 1964”. great-train-robbery · beat 3 · The 1964 trial at Aylesbury was a national spectacle. Edmund Davies's thirty-year terms for several robbers were meant as deterrence after a night that had injured a driver and humiliated the Post Office. Appeals softened some paths; the tariff still defined a generation of British

A mail train, a farm and a thirty-year tariff The Great Train Robbery is Britain's most retold cash theft: a dated sum, a named bridge, an Aylesbury dock and a cultural afterlife that outran the missing notes. The Travelling Post Office moved registered mail and high-value packets between Glasgow and London. The 8 August train carried used notes being returned to London — a fact later used to explain both the size of the haul and why serials were hard to spend. The official £2.6 million is the figure this atlas uses; later inflation comparisons belong in money notes, not in the 1963 line.

Recovery was partial. Police found some money at Leatherslade and in later arrests. Large amounts were never returned to the Royal Mail or the banks. The convicted status of the people and the incomplete recovery of the cash are different columns, as at Antwerp. The train was halted at Bridego Bridge in rural Buckinghamshire. After the bags were taken, the gang went to Leatherslade Farm, which they had bought as a temporary base. Neighbours and a land search put police onto the farm days later. This page does not reconstruct how the train was stopped.

Fingerprints, stolen vehicles, witness sightings and the farm debris built the Flying Squad case. Jack Slipper and other Yard officers became English-language characters. The investigation is a 1960s detective story with names, not an unsolved puzzle. The 1964 trial at Aylesbury was a national spectacle. Edmund Davies's thirty-year terms for several robbers were meant as deterrence after a night that had injured a driver and humiliated the Post Office. Appeals softened some paths; the tariff still defined a generation of British crime sentencing talk.

In 1963, Great Train Robbery keeps 1964 and “Aylesbury, 1964.” Change the verb when the status changes. Keep Great Train Robbery with “Aylesbury, 1964” and 1964 from 1963. 19641963

Figures to keep

Reference
1963
Key figure
1964
Topic
Great Train Robbery
Focus
Aylesbury, 1964
01

Interactive Scenario & Decision Matrix

Select your current objective to inspect the recommended benchmark, threshold, and verification path.

The claim to test is {claim1}.

Briefing 11 for Amelia Earhart disappearance aligns condition “A second departure” with reference value 1937 on the ground.

Amelia Earhart disappearance: 1937 (1937)
02

United States (US) Institutional & Field Benchmark

US
Primary reference framework
cases · English-language conservation readers
Verification standard
Agencies · evidence · public record
Metric & unit convention
Amelia Earhart disappearance · 1937 (1937)

English pages stay on public-record mysteries, frauds, heists and disasters — no wars and no how-to crime.

03

Self-Diagnostic Readiness Checklist

0 / 5

Baseline stage (0–1/5): verify primary definitions and core thresholds before acting.

04

Quantitative Distribution & Benchmark Sparkbars

Amelia Earhart disappearance (A second departure)1937 · 81%
Amelia Earhart disappearance (Lae to Howland)2 · 75%
Amelia Earhart disappearance (The 157–337 transmission)157 · 79%
Amelia Earhart disappearance (A fleet search)2 · 93%
05

5-Step Execution & Verification Playbook

  1. Name the published claim — Aftermath file lists: "{claim0}" — not a new accusation from this page.
  2. Name the timeline beat — First beat on file: {beat0}.
  3. Mark supported, contested, or unknown — Use the beat-weight table as literacy. Default stays unknown until you choose.
  4. No encyclopedia verdict — Court outcomes and jury splits stay in primary sources; marks here do not change them.
  5. Amelia Earhart disappearance (5) — Atlas note 45 on Amelia Earhart disappearance defines the operating range of 1937 when “A second departure” applies.
06

Myth vs. Evidence Fact-Check

How do I read a Theranos claim against this dossier timeline?

Aftermath claims already on file sit beside beats already published here: 2003 founding, 2013 Walgreens rollout, 2014 peak private valuation, 15 October 2015 Journal investigation, 2016 CMS sanctions, 2018 SEC charges and wind-down, 2021 Holmes trial in San Jose. The pairing is a reading aid, not a new court finding.

Was Holmes convicted of harming patients?

The January 2022 Northern District of California verdict convicted her on investor-related wire-fraud counts and acquitted her on patient-related counts. Balwani was convicted on patient-related counts in July 2022. Marking a beat supported or contested on this page does not change that public record and is not this encyclopedia verdict.

Did the Journal invent the laboratory problems?

No. Carreyrou 15 October 2015 Wall Street Journal series is the public break. CMS later sanctioned the Newark lab (2016), and two juries independently found serious false statements. The claim that the Journal invented it is already listed to weigh against those years, not as this page conclusion.

What do supported, contested, and unknown mean on the beat-weight table?

They are editorial marks you set on this device against claims already in the aftermath chapter (patient-harm, Journal invention, no tests ever ran, 9 billion public company). Default is unknown. They teach how a public-record file can be read; they are not a legal verdict, not a how-to, and not a private case file.

07

Domain Jargon & Terminology Decoder

Public record
Atlas note 61 on Amelia Earhart disappearance defines the operating range of 1937 when “A second departure” applies.
Evidence meter
Dossier 62 for Amelia Earhart disappearance links case “Lae to Howland” directly to metric 2 (1937).
Amelia Earhart disappearance (The 157–337 transm
Field guide 63 on Amelia Earhart disappearance checks parameter 157 first whenever evaluating “The 157–337 transmission”.
Amelia Earhart disappearance (A fleet search)
Section 64 on Amelia Earhart disappearance pairs “A fleet search” with benchmark figure 2 (1937) for a grounded decision.
Amelia Earhart disappearance (Legal death, open
Analysis 65 for Amelia Earhart disappearance anchors “Legal death, open wreck” to indicator 1939 so readers can verify the scale.
Amelia Earhart disappearance (Luke Field crash)
Record 66 on Amelia Earhart disappearance explains what the threshold 20 means in practice under “Luke Field crash”.
08

Risk & Failure-Mode Early Warning Radar

  • Not a field guide or permit advice. / cases
  • Section 72 on Amelia Earhart disappearance pairs “Lae to Howland” with benchmark figure 2 (1937) for a grounded decision.
  • Analysis 73 for Amelia Earhart disappearance anchors “The 157–337 transmission” to indicator 157 so readers can verify the scale.
  • Record 74 on Amelia Earhart disappearance explains what the threshold 2 means in practice under “A fleet search”.

Jack the Ripper (1888): Warren goes, the year ends — Section 976: Warren goes, the year endsNext essayAll 1100 essays1100