Dual coding — what the studies actually show. The evidence list below names the studies that actually constrain word-picture pairs.
Scores here are relative ranks inside this atlas, not lab grades or official cut scores.
Evidence
- Classical source — Paivio is the public name this atlas attaches to the origin story of two channels.
- Modern constraint — Mayer and later work keep two channels from being treated as magic: effort and test still matter.
- Exam listing — two channels earns its exam-fit score when the sitting asks for a name, number or chosen method under time.
- Dunlosky utility — Dunlosky's reviews treat practice testing and distributed practice as high-utility — two channels is one way to run them.
- Bjork difficulty — Bjork's desirable difficulty says a slightly harder retrieve of two channels beats a fluent reread.
Mechanisms
- Retrieval as encoding — Producing two channels from a blank page is a new encoding, not a photocopy of the reread.
- Error as signal — A miss on two channels tells you which fact to split or rewrite. A fluent reread hides that.
- Time-box honesty — two channels that only happens after midnight is a scheduling fail, not a character fail.
- Transfer test — If you cannot do two channels in a different room, you have context, not skill.
Researchers
- Paivio — Paivio is cited as a public scientific name for two channels, not as a private coach.
- Mayer — Mayer appears because later measurement tightened the first story of two channels.
- John Dunlosky — Dunlosky's utility rankings are the classroom constraint: two channels should earn its hours against cheaper rereading.
- Robert Bjork — Desirable difficulty explains why two channels that feels slightly late is often the useful one.
Educational atlas — not an official syllabus, medical advice, or leaked item bank. Dual coding: Keep the public outline in view and treat this page as method, not a leaked key.
ScienceMethodDrillsFast passPitfallsToolsStoriesLocale playbook