Charles Ponzi (1920): State larceny and a lasting name — Section 992: State larceny and a lasting
Section 992 on Charles Ponzi pairs “State larceny and a lasting name” with benchmark figure 1925 (1920) for a grounded decision. charles-ponzi · beat 4 · Agents and word of mouth filled the office. The cash intake outran anything the international coupon market could have supplied. Keep Charles Ponzi with “State larceny and a lasting name” and 1925 from 1920. July and August 1920 articles, with Barron's coupon-market
Charles Ponzi's 1920 Boston collapse, built on promised profits from postal reply coupons, gave the English language its name for paying earlier investors with later ones. In 1919-1920 Charles Ponzi, an Italian-born promoter in Boston, promised extraordinary short-term returns through a business he said would exploit price differences in International Reply Coupons, postal instruments intended to prepay return postage across borders. Crowds brought cash to his Securities Exchange Company. The promised coupon arbitrage could not support the volume of money taken in.
The Boston Post, with help from financial publisher Clarence W. Barron, published investigations in July and August 1920 that compared the coupon market's real size with Ponzi's intake. State and federal authorities moved as redemptions and a run developed. Ponzi surrendered in August 1920. He pleaded guilty to federal mail fraud and later faced Massachusetts larceny convictions after a first state trial hung and a second convicted him.
The dollar scale was of its time: contemporary estimates put liabilities on the order of $15-20 million in 1920 dollars, a fraction of later cases in this atlas, but the legal and linguistic imprint was larger. English-language law and journalism adopted 'Ponzi scheme' as the name for a fraud that pays earlier participants with money from later ones. Earlier operators had used the pattern; this collapse named it.
In 1920, Charles Ponzi keeps 1925 and “State larceny and a lasting name.” Change the verb when the status changes. Keep Charles Ponzi with “State larceny and a lasting name” and 1925 from 1920. 19251920
Figures to keep
- Reference
- 1920
- Key figure
- 1925
- Topic
- Charles Ponzi
- Focus
- State larceny and a lasting name
Interactive Scenario & Decision Matrix
Select your current objective to inspect the recommended benchmark, threshold, and verification path.
The claim to test is {claim1}.
Briefing 11 for Amelia Earhart disappearance aligns condition “A second departure” with reference value 1937 on the ground.
Amelia Earhart disappearance: 1937 (1937)The dated beat to set beside it is {beat1}.
Reading 12 of Amelia Earhart disappearance uses “Lae to Howland” and figure 2 as a checkable baseline.
Amelia Earhart disappearance: 2 (1937)If {beat1} does not support {claim1}, the teaching result is unsupported, not solved.
Atlas note 13 on Amelia Earhart disappearance defines the operating range of 157 when “The 157–337 transmission” applies.
Amelia Earhart disappearance: 157 (1937)Reading 4 of Amelia Earhart disappearance uses “A fleet search” and figure 2 as a checkable baseline.
Dossier 14 for Amelia Earhart disappearance links case “A fleet search” directly to metric 2 (1937).
Amelia Earhart disappearance: 2 (1937)United States (US) Institutional & Field Benchmark
US- Primary reference framework
- cases · English-language conservation readers
- Verification standard
- Agencies · evidence · public record
- Metric & unit convention
- Amelia Earhart disappearance · 1937 (1937)
English pages stay on public-record mysteries, frauds, heists and disasters — no wars and no how-to crime.
Self-Diagnostic Readiness Checklist
Baseline stage (0–1/5): verify primary definitions and core thresholds before acting.
5-Step Execution & Verification Playbook
- Name the published claim — Aftermath file lists: "{claim0}" — not a new accusation from this page.
- Name the timeline beat — First beat on file: {beat0}.
- Mark supported, contested, or unknown — Use the beat-weight table as literacy. Default stays unknown until you choose.
- No encyclopedia verdict — Court outcomes and jury splits stay in primary sources; marks here do not change them.
- Amelia Earhart disappearance (5) — Atlas note 45 on Amelia Earhart disappearance defines the operating range of 1937 when “A second departure” applies.
Myth vs. Evidence Fact-Check
How do I read a Theranos claim against this dossier timeline?
Aftermath claims already on file sit beside beats already published here: 2003 founding, 2013 Walgreens rollout, 2014 peak private valuation, 15 October 2015 Journal investigation, 2016 CMS sanctions, 2018 SEC charges and wind-down, 2021 Holmes trial in San Jose. The pairing is a reading aid, not a new court finding.
Was Holmes convicted of harming patients?
The January 2022 Northern District of California verdict convicted her on investor-related wire-fraud counts and acquitted her on patient-related counts. Balwani was convicted on patient-related counts in July 2022. Marking a beat supported or contested on this page does not change that public record and is not this encyclopedia verdict.
Did the Journal invent the laboratory problems?
No. Carreyrou 15 October 2015 Wall Street Journal series is the public break. CMS later sanctioned the Newark lab (2016), and two juries independently found serious false statements. The claim that the Journal invented it is already listed to weigh against those years, not as this page conclusion.
What do supported, contested, and unknown mean on the beat-weight table?
They are editorial marks you set on this device against claims already in the aftermath chapter (patient-harm, Journal invention, no tests ever ran, 9 billion public company). Default is unknown. They teach how a public-record file can be read; they are not a legal verdict, not a how-to, and not a private case file.
Domain Jargon & Terminology Decoder
- Public record
- Atlas note 61 on Amelia Earhart disappearance defines the operating range of 1937 when “A second departure” applies.
- Evidence meter
- Dossier 62 for Amelia Earhart disappearance links case “Lae to Howland” directly to metric 2 (1937).
- Amelia Earhart disappearance (The 157–337 transm
- Field guide 63 on Amelia Earhart disappearance checks parameter 157 first whenever evaluating “The 157–337 transmission”.
- Amelia Earhart disappearance (A fleet search)
- Section 64 on Amelia Earhart disappearance pairs “A fleet search” with benchmark figure 2 (1937) for a grounded decision.
- Amelia Earhart disappearance (Legal death, open
- Analysis 65 for Amelia Earhart disappearance anchors “Legal death, open wreck” to indicator 1939 so readers can verify the scale.
- Amelia Earhart disappearance (Luke Field crash)
- Record 66 on Amelia Earhart disappearance explains what the threshold 20 means in practice under “Luke Field crash”.
Risk & Failure-Mode Early Warning Radar
- Not a field guide or permit advice. / cases
- Section 72 on Amelia Earhart disappearance pairs “Lae to Howland” with benchmark figure 2 (1937) for a grounded decision.
- Analysis 73 for Amelia Earhart disappearance anchors “The 157–337 transmission” to indicator 157 so readers can verify the scale.
- Record 74 on Amelia Earhart disappearance explains what the threshold 2 means in practice under “A fleet search”.
Chernobyl disaster (1986): Reports, trial, sarcophagus — Section 993: Reports, trial, sarcophagusNext essayAll 1100 essays1100