Crane in 1952s: Kushiro feeding — Section 1030: Kushiro feeding
Dossier 1030 for Crane links case “Kushiro feeding” directly to metric 1990 (1952s). RSPB, NatureScot, reintroductions and a dense NGO press shape how this atlas type is taught in British English. 1952s: log Crane under “Kushiro feeding” with 1990. Do not rank the species. Habitats Directive, IWC delegations and returning wolves sit beside UK practice without being identical.
The taxonomy hero is Grus japonensis -- Kushiro, the Korean DMZ and Izumi. Other Grus species appear as comparison, not as the page type. How close did whooping cranes come to zero? The Aransas-Wood Buffalo flock was about 21 birds in 1941. That nadir still defines US recovery graphs. When reading the “Kushiro feeding” stage inside the Crane atlas entry, recording both the reference period and the operating boundary around figure 1990 prevents common misinterpretations in real-world decisions.
He courtship-danced with a human-imprinted whooping crane named Tex so she would ovulate -- a 1980s method story, not a field census. A large share of the migratory island population winters on one Kyushu floodplain. Influenza years there are species-level events. Pairs are typically socially monogamous. The dance is pair-bond and territorial display, not a fairy-tale wedding.
Wintering red-crowned and white-naped cranes use the Civilian Control Zone. Peace-time development is a documented risk to that accidental reserve. Chicks imprint on humans and then fail to migrate or pair. Operation Migration ultralights (2001-2015) tried to teach a new flyway. Is the Hokkaido tancho a separate species?
The order on the card is year, line, figure. Crane is not sorted by how much visitors like the photo. 1952s: log Crane under “Kushiro feeding” with 1990. Do not rank the species. 19901952s
Figures to keep
- Reference
- 1952s
- Key figure
- 1990
- Topic
- Crane
- Focus
- Kushiro feeding
Interactive Scenario & Decision Matrix
Select your current objective to inspect the recommended benchmark, threshold, and verification path.
The resilience mark to keep is {res}.
Briefing 11 for African bush elephant aligns condition “Amboseli project starts” with reference value 2021 on the ground.
African bush elephant: 2021 (1972)The ecological-role mark to keep is {eco}.
Reading 12 of African bush elephant uses “Douglas-Hamilton continent count” and figure 2021 as a checkable baseline.
African bush elephant: 2021 (1979)Write {res} and {eco}. Neither mark makes {name} the winner.
Atlas note 13 on African bush elephant defines the operating range of 2021 when “CITES ivory ban” applies.
African bush elephant: 2021 (1989)Reading 4 of African bush elephant uses “Kruger culling pause” and figure 2021 as a checkable baseline.
Dossier 14 for African bush elephant links case “Kruger culling pause” directly to metric 2021 (1995).
African bush elephant: 2021 (1995)United States (US) Institutional & Field Benchmark
US- Primary reference framework
- Browse birds, fish, and wildlife with conservation context — not a pocket field key.
- Verification standard
- Season lens: migration and breeding calendars shift by hemisphere — open a species, then check local phenology before planning trips.
- Metric & unit convention
- African bush elephant · 2021 (1972)
Species pages synthesize ecology, culture, and conservation for browsing — scores are editorial lenses, not IUCN ranks.
Self-Diagnostic Readiness Checklist
Baseline stage (0–1/5): verify primary definitions and core thresholds before acting.
5-Step Execution & Verification Playbook
- Pin one anatomy system — Start with {anat0} already in the anatomy chapter.
- Pin one behaviour principle — Pair it with {beh0} from how-it-works — a reading aid, not a winner board.
- Read conservation as literacy — Resilience and any IUCN label on file are published notes, not a live red-list API.
- Scores are not a species ranking — The six hub marks compare types in this atlas; they do not crown a best species.
- African bush elephant (5) — Atlas note 45 on African bush elephant defines the operating range of 2021 when “Amboseli project starts” applies.
Myth vs. Evidence Fact-Check
How do I read tiger anatomy against behaviour on this page?
Pin one anatomy system already listed, for example Support and integument (striped ambush body and a neck-or-throat killing bite) or Feeding apparatus (sit-and-ambush on chital, sambar, wild pig), against one how-it-works principle such as Energy in, work out or Information before motion. The pair is a reading aid, not a winner board.
Does this atlas rank tigers against lions or other species?
No. Scores are relative editorial marks across 24 types: speed 69, intelligence 76, range 37, resilience 14, cultural impact 94, ecological role 82. They are not a best-species ranking and not a live race.
Is the resilience number a live IUCN feed?
No. Resilience 14/100 is an on-file teaching band: Endangered, with India counts up after Project Tiger (1973) and Tx2 pledges (2010), while Southeast Asian and South China lineages did not share that graph. There is no live Red List poll on this page.
Why pin night vision with the striped coat?
The anatomy chapter says night vision and hearing work in closed forest, and stripes break outline more than they advertise. The matching behaviour principle is Information before motion. Pinning those two together teaches the ambush already on file; it is not a new field measurement.
Domain Jargon & Terminology Decoder
- 1
- Name the question (ID, trip, report, compare) before opening sections.
- 2
- Cross-read anatomy with culture and market.
- 3
- Verify protected status on primary sources.
- 4
- Do not treat meters as absolute rankings.
- African bush elephant (One-off ivory sales)
- Analysis 65 for African bush elephant anchors “One-off ivory sales” to indicator 2021 so readers can verify the scale.
- African bush elephant (Tanzania)
- Record 66 on African bush elephant explains what the threshold 2021 means in practice under “Tanzania”.
Risk & Failure-Mode Early Warning Radar
- This is not a field identification key and not veterinary advice. Protected-status claims need local law checks.
- Section 72 on African bush elephant pairs “Douglas-Hamilton continent count” with benchmark figure 2021 (1979) for a grounded decision.
- Analysis 73 for African bush elephant anchors “CITES ivory ban” to indicator 2021 so readers can verify the scale.
- Record 74 on African bush elephant explains what the threshold 2021 means in practice under “Kruger culling pause”.
Eagle in 50: Accipitrid radiation — Section 1031: Accipitrid radiationNext essayAll 1100 essays1100