Skip to content Skip to a section
People and place

Social trust in 2007: E Pluribus Unum — diversity and trust in A

Trust is maintained by everyday institutions and habits that can erode. Keep Social trust with “E Pluribus Unum — diversity and trust in A” and 2007 from 2007. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity

Francis Fukuyama argued that large-scale economic coordination depends on "spontaneous sociability" beyond family clans — but he and later scholars stress that such trust is cultivated by history, religion, state quality, and inequality, not written in genes. High-trust societies often combine strong institutions with everyday norms learned in schools, workplaces, and media.

This page explains trust as competitiveness: when people expect fairness from unknown others, markets deepen, tax compliance rises, and public goods get funded. It is not a racial trait. Surveys that compare countries or neighborhoods describe institutional and cultural outcomes — never IQ-by-group ranks or cranial hierarchies. Critiques of Putnam's early diversity findings remind us that trust can fall when inequality and segregation persist, even in diverse cities — a design problem, not destiny.

What is generalized vs particularized trust? Particularized trust targets people you know — kin, co-ethnic networks. Generalized trust extends to strangers and abstract institutions. Economic scale usually needs the second kind, backed by courts and norms when personal ties fail.

Fold the league table. Keep 2007, “E Pluribus Unum — diversity and trust in A,” and 2007 for Social trust. Keep Social trust with “E Pluribus Unum — diversity and trust in A” and 2007 from 2007. 20072007

Figures to keep

Year of the account
2007
Figure beside it
2007
Topic
Social trust
Line about the life
E Pluribus Unum — diversity and trust in A

Soft power & culture in 2010s: Public diplomacy and nation brandingNext essayAll 1000 essays1000