Skip to content Skip to a section
Baby naming

Science

What we actually know about how parents choose — and what we do not.

At a glance
Score intensity

Darker cells mean a higher score for this topic on that metric.

Last reviewed Sources & creditsMedia creditsMethodology

Quick answers

When is the name legally real?

When the birth is registered — deadlines differ. A ceremony can precede or follow the file.

Should we use last year’s most popular name?

Only if you like that taste. Lieberson treated peaks as fashion, not as a quality award. Cite SSA/ONS/KOSTAT by year if you cite a rank.

How do we handle grandparents’ vetoes?

Name the value (honour vs. ease) instead of pretending there is a cosmic right answer. Generation syllables can be a compromise in some families.

Are meaning charts useful?

Etymology is a story you can tell. Stroke-count luck and destiny apps are not part of this atlas’s craft.

What if our country has a banned list?

Iceland, Germany and Japan can refuse a string. Check before you print the cards.

Will a “White-sounding” name protect our child?

Bertrand and Mullainathan documented U.S. callback bias. That is a fact about employers, not a moral requirement to hide heritage.

Start with this section - Science

Lieberson is still the best theory of fashion. Audit studies are the best theory of other people’s ears. Neither is a baby-picking algorithm.

There is no reputable finding that a lucky stroke count improves outcomes.

Findings

Mechanisms

Debates

Science can describe the social weather. It cannot tell you the name of your child.

HistoryScienceCraftCultureTrendsVoicesWorldwide