Neil McElroy's original title for P&G's product-owning executives never spread far under that exact name. By the 1950s it had split in two: 'brand manager', which stayed inside marketing departments, and the newer 'product manager', which technology companies began applying to a broader, less advertising-focused job.
Brand man no longer exists as a living trade. Here is what erased it, and which profession took on the work.
Brand management is born at P&G
Neil McElroy's 1931 memo takes hold quickly inside Procter & Gamble: within a generation, dozens of 'brand men' each track one product's sales, advertising and profit as though running an independent business. McElroy himself rises through the company, becoming its president in 1948. Other American consumer-goods firms, including General Foods, begin copying the structure, but the idea stays confined to marketing departments selling soap, food and household goods — nothing resembling software yet exists for anyone to manage.
What else was happening then
McElroy's three-page memo proposes that each Procter & Gamble product get one accountable owner tracking its sales and advertising, competing even against the company's own other brands — the founding document of brand management.
Toyota begins assigning a single 'shusa', or chief engineer, full authority over a vehicle's entire development from concept to production, a model later studied and cited by Silicon Valley product-management writers as proof that one person should own a product end to end.
Hirotaka Takeuchi and Ikujiro Nonaka publish "The New New Product Development Game" in Harvard Business Review, describing small, self-organizing teams at Honda, Canon and Fuji-Xerox — the paper that later gives Scrum its name and its rugby metaphor.
Where that work lives now
Decides what a company should build next, and why — turning customer needs, business goals and engineering limits into one shared plan nobody else fully owns.
🗺️ Product Manager →