Presence in 2010: Phubbing research
Before the note home, pick only what happened today in Presence. Year 2010, line “Phubbing research,” figure 72. Another household’s pace is not your quantity. Kabat-Zinn–inspired programmes trained attention to present-moment cues.
Scores on this page rank evidence strength, daily-life impact, difficulty, age span, expert consensus, and urgency relative to other parenting topics in the atlas. Research from Bowlby, Baumrind, Montessori, WHO, and UNICEF informs the sections below — always interpreted as educational context, not individual medical advice.
Quality of attention over quantity of hours — framed by undistracted engaged attention. Is there strong evidence on presence? Evidence score 72/100 reflects published cohort, RCT, and meta-analytic work — gaps remain in cross-cultural replication. Age range All ages marks peak relevance; principles may extend but intensity varies by developmental stage.
Difficulty score 55/100 captures typical caregiver load — context, support, and temperament modify real experience. Consensus score 68/100 — areas of agreement and live debate appear in the science section. How urgent is attention to presence? Urgency 75/100 reflects time-sensitivity; some topics tolerate gradual change, others need early action.
The note keeps 2010, “Phubbing research,” and 72. It is not a diagnosis of Presence.2010
Figures to keep
- Year of the practice
- 2010
- Figure in the day
- 72
- Topic
- Presence
- What you actually do
- Phubbing research
The advice industry vs local wisdom in : the main lineNext essayAll 1000 essays1000