Skip to content Skip to a section
The practice log

Strategic talent in 1946: de Groot’s Thought and Choice in Chess

Chess psychology (de Groot, Chase and Simon, later Ericsson and Gobet) made expertise a laboratory. Macnamara’ In a lesson on Strategic talent, write the task’s name, not the adjective of praise. Year 1946, line “de Groot’s Thought and Choice in Chess,” figure 26. A childhood story is not a ceiling. Links, glossary and adjacent themes around Strategic talent.

Chess psychology (de Groot, Chase and Simon, later Ericsson and Gobet) made expertise a laboratory. Macnamara’s 2014 games band put deliberate practice at about 26% of variance — the highest of their domain bands, still a minority. Judit Polgár’s career was a family experiment against “no women at the top” folklore.

Go, war colleges and entrepreneurial strategy share mechanisms and do not share a single IQ. This page is not a ranking of nations’ “game intelligence”. Strategic talent mapped for mechanisms, locale notes and limits. Strategic talent sits in the mind atlas — mechanisms, locale notes and limits, not slogans.

Adoption and meaning follow schools, clubs and labs as much as peak specs. selection systems without group rankings. conservatories, gyms and classrooms. No population score rankings; no race hierarchies. Editorial scores help browsing; they are not certificates. Same atlas neighbourhood as Strategic talent (mind).

The log keeps task, time, and feedback. If “de Groot’s Thought and Choice in Chess” is the task, the figure is 26 and the year is 1946.1946

Figures to keep

Year of the log
1946
Practice figure
26
Topic
Strategic talent
Log line
de Groot’s Thought and Choice in Chess

Talent identification in 1926: Hollingworth’s classroom workNext essayAll 1000 essays1000