Skip to content Skip to a section
A household choice

Nominal vs real returns as of 2

Transfer before discretionary spend expands. Restore the last inputs for Nominal vs real returns: “Horizon honesty” and 2 in one session. Split raises between lifestyle and contribution rate.

Do I need a high return for compounding to matter? Higher net rates help, but time and contributions often dominate — especially early. Costs and behaviour can erase a “good” rate. Treat outputs as scenario sketches. Vary contribution, rate, fees and inflation to see which lever moves your goal date.

Always ask whether a figure is nominal or real. A high nominal path can still lose purchasing power. No. Illustrations use round teaching numbers. Markets, inflation and taxes change. In the net rate that compounds. Expense ratios, advice charges and spreads all reduce terminal wealth.

From foundations, continue to contributions-vs-rate or fee-drag; for behaviour, open consistency-habit or panic-selling. This atlas page keeps the focus on mechanisms you can reason about: rates, time, contributions, costs and behaviour — not stock tips or promised yields. Separate contributions, growth, fees, taxes and withdrawals. Mixing them hides which lever actually moved.

Keep the name, the year, and 2. “Horizon honesty” is why those three stay. Restore the last inputs for Nominal vs real returns: “Horizon honesty” and 2 in one session. 22

Figures to keep

Year of the rule
2
Figure in the sum
2
Item
Nominal vs real returns
Reason kept
Horizon honesty

Opportunity cost as of 2Next essayAll 1000 essays1000