Atlantic bluefin tuna in 1997: Song for the Blue Ocean · 281
[280] [desk-bluefin-tuna-4] In 1997, the field log for Atlantic bluefin tuna is headed “Song for the Blue Ocean.” The figure kept beside that heading is 1997. It is a count or a date from the work, not a rank of the species’ worth. A zoo birthday card does not replace the log. Predation and crop-raid compensation schemes (US, Kenya, India) published per-head bands that changed with election cycles
A warm-bodied tuna whose Tokyo auction prices and ICCAT quotas made a single fish into a geopolitical unit. Is the January auction price a stock assessment? No. First-sale theatrics at Tsukiji/Toyosu are marketing. ICCAT indices and spawning-stock biomass are the management numbers.
Did Atlantic bluefin recover in the 2010s? Eastern Atlantic/Mediterranean quotas and enforcement improved some indices after a crash. Recovered is a press word; scientists speak in probabilities and two stocks. Purse seines catch live fish for fattening cages. It can hide juvenile take inside a farmed label.
Why did Carl Safina write about bluefin? Song for the Blue Ocean (1997) and later essays treated giant tuna as a governance failure, not a recipe. Thunnus orientalis is a different species under WCPFC/IATTC math. The sushi case looks identical; the commissions do not. Burst speeds exceed 60 km/h. Regional endothermy lets the fish hunt in colder water than most tunas.
Keep 1997, “Song for the Blue Ocean,” and 1997 together or the note on Atlantic bluefin tuna stops being that year’s record.1997
Figures to keep
- Year of the note
- 1997
- Figure to keep
- 1997
- Species
- Atlantic bluefin tuna
- Line in the log
- Song for the Blue Ocean
Clownfish in 1972: Allen anemonefish monograph · 282Next essayAll 1000 essays1000